|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Weight of a Kinoton FP-30D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 07-22-2017 11:19 AM
That's a nice setup Tony. The Barbican Cinima in London had the same machines when they borrowed prints of a couple of shorts which I had in my collection at the time for a season on British film music. They were films by BP and I think the music was by Malcolm Arnold. What are the inverted 'T' shaped things behind the machines?
The Rio, Dalston, in East London also had a single one of these machines, but with only one lamphouse. There was a periscope arrangement between lamp and projector, with a lever on top to flip a mirror into the light path for 16 mm. I've also seen a picture of a pair with single Peerless lamps with a rackover system. Not sure if they were still carbon or xenon conversions/
Those machines must be very heavy.
Steve,
When I get a few minutes I'll send you a private message, with a couple of photographs of what we're proposing to do. It's not our cinema, it belongs to the council and we just hire it from them to screen films, but they have agreed in principle to the movement of the projectors to correct the serious horizontal keystoning on the digital machine, even with the lens shifted right over. If this goes ahead we will almost certainly have to submit a risk assessment and method statement, so advice from somebody who has actually moved Kinoton projectors could be very useful.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God
Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 07-22-2017 02:39 PM
Thank you Stephen. The "T" shaped things are supports for 35mm lamphouses..which I found odd as the support would have been better on the 16mm side. (Or better yet, centered between the two..) I was never sure if they were even installed correctly...the original installer (who bailed the week before the room was scheduled to open, leaving behind a LOT of unfinished tasks) did not exactly have the best of reputations.
I had no issues with the machines being unstable or prone to tipping. But as you can see, I had to add the feet to the rear of the machines to get the correct projection angle. (They originally just had 1/2" diameter bolts that were screwed down though the black base legs, resting on metal electrical cover plates to protect the tile floor..)
To safely shift them, I would move the rear end first, then the front, alternating that till I got them in position. If done carefully it was no problem, and I only weighed in at about 150lbs. Two people could do it faster and safer.
I would guesstimate them to weigh in at 650-750lbs each with the 16mmm and dual lamphouses.
RE the risk assessment and method statement, sounds like a University thing. I had to submit all kinds of paperwork to do the upgrades and proposals to add a d-cinema projector (which never happened when I was there due to budget).
As for methods, hopefully someone here can come up with a "certified" method to pass on, or just print out this thread with the advice posted so far..
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Stephen Furley
Film God
Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002
|
posted 07-23-2017 12:56 PM
Thanks for the advice.
Tony, a co-incidence that you should mention 'Chelsea Girls'. A local art gallery is hiring the cinema on several days in September for a season of Warhol related films, and we have been asked if there is any way that we could screen this on two projectors. Since you've seen it, can you answer a few questions:
How is the sound, on one print or both, optical or magnetic? Is frame accurate synchronisation on interlocked projectors required, or would just starting two machines together and letting them run wild be close enough? I believe that the film runs for over three hours; how are the prints supplied, in 2000 foot or smaller parts, or on large spools so that they can only be run on machines which can take these?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God
Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004
|
posted 07-23-2017 09:42 PM
Here's the scoop on Chelsea Girls as I remember it:
First, it was on several 400' or so reels which I ran individually. I would not suggest building onto big reels, as part of the "show" was doing things against the professional projectionist creed..such as allowing reels to tail out, running up incoming reels with the leader projected, etc.
Sound was optical.
You will need to disable the electrical link for "normal" changeovers..each machine MUST be able to open and close dowser and sound individually. The pictures run side by side for the entire show. White screens and dark screens as you rethread are expected.
As for sound, I ran the optical sound from each projector through a mixer with mic preamps so I could mix and fade the sound as needed, then ran that through the nonsync input on my (then CP65) at UCI. Don't worry about Academy mono or any other sound standards, the sound is 70's AM radio awful...another part of the "charm" of the show. You can if you wish do as Martin suggested and route the sound to the left and right, switching it on and off on each channel as needed, or mix it as I did and run it centre channel only.
The archive sent me a "cue" sheet with instructions on timing and sound mixes, with the annotation that it is up to the projectionist to feel free to improvise and have fun with the timing of sound and picture.
The sync is wild, no interlock needed. The looser the show the better. If you end up running it multiple showings, feel free to play with the timings a bit ...
As I mentioned, you may need to move the machines closer to each other (or further apart) to get both images side by side.
It was a fun show to run for sure.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|