|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Mystery Crackle in Analog Track
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martin McCaffery
Film God
Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 04-24-2018 11:05 AM
Paul: Tried Reel 1 on Projectors 2. The first five or so minutes is clean, then the sound gets more like Reel 3. Light crackle and a regularly repeating "shush shush" like paper being torn instead of crumbled.
Richard: I reported it yesterday. They said they haven't had any complaints, but didn't say how long ago it was last run. We're already going to lose money on this, so even if they have another print, it's not worth it at this point. Ironically (or annoyingly) this is the film where the rights holder wouldn't let us show the 4k restoration because we only have 2k.
BTW: mono track,bilateral area, slight fading, very little dirt.
Just to be sure, I also tried Reel 6 on both projectors, has the shush sound. The dead leader at the end of the reels has no crackle or shush.
Ran some optical loops. No problem. Ran a reel of cyan track trailers. Nothing. It's gotta be the film.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Donald Brown
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 131
From: Lincoln, DE
Registered: Sep 2009
|
posted 04-24-2018 05:11 PM
A number of years ago, I had what may have been a similar issue with several reels of a print. There were bubbles in the emulsion which appeared on screen as if they were snow. What I believe had occurred was that the print absorbed humidity, and the heat at the aperture boiled the moisture and lifted the emulsion as it passed through the gate. Although the lamp was equipped with an IR filter and the head was water cooled, several reels of the print had absorbed an inordinate amount of moisture while threaded off of a 6,000' reel prior to the start of the show. On screen, the result appeared as white dots or small circles in the center of the picture. To prevent further lifting, I backed the lamp focus off slightly, and the snow effect immediately disappeared, although the print remained laden with moisture until the relative humidity of the atmosphere dropped. I would be very curious to know if moisture caused your issue as well. After 35mm print services were transferred from Technicolor to the domain of FotoKem, moisture absorption became a more noticeable problem. One can only assume that this was a byproduct of cost cutting measures associated with processing.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|