my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » "Fuzzy" or "Scuzzy" drive? (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: "Fuzzy" or "Scuzzy" drive? Brent Francis Film Handler Posts: 84 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Nov 2008 posted 03-05-2019 11:43 AM                        Hi. Old ex-projectionist with old/former tech question. Trying to remember details of a sound system (we called it "Fuzzy" drive),used at the start of digital sound. When the film started running, the projector was interlocked with an audio card (I think?) that would send a repeating electronic pulse to the audio system, keeping it in sync. My nephew's curious about this for a school project & I can't seem to find anything on the net. All I remember is that it broke down half the time! Thanks.  |  IP: Logged Martin McCaffery Film God Posts: 2481 From: Montgomery, AL Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-05-2019 04:35 PM                        Do you mean a SCSI drive? Which were called "scuzzy drives" Wikipedia  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 03-05-2019 05:09 PM                     Sync with audio to begin the digital audio .. sounds like DTS where it was a new version of "sound on disc" during the talkies era. ..where the disc would sync with the frame of the feature (even though with DTS, there were more processes needed to make this work. IMAX 15/70 used Sonics where the frame would be in alignment with a roller where it would send pulses to the Sonics system so audio would be in sync with the image. Monte  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 03-05-2019 05:19 PM                     Around the early nineties, there were a few prototype digital film sound systems around using a separate medium, synced to the filmstrip via a so called timecode. Of these systems, only DTS had a considerable market share later. DTS indeed used SCSI CD-drives. You can find some documents about these systems in the film-tech warehouse download section unter Manuals - > Sound Equipment. Look for DTS 6 or DTS 6D. These manuals also contain a short introduction to the system. Wikipedia has an article about DTS, but, over time, DTS created many different systems and it may be complicated for you to understand the differences. You may read unter 'History' and 'Theatrical use'. - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Armand Daiguillon Film Handler Posts: 46 From: Plantation FL USA Registered: Jan 2018 posted 03-05-2019 05:23 PM                     Yeah, you're definitely thinking of DTS. It was one of the 3 digital sound formats of the time (least popular) the others were SDDS (sony) and Dolby Digital. DTS used separate discs for the audio - these followed a time code on the film. It differed from the rest in that the digital audio was not on the print - but on separate discs. SDDS and Dolby had the digital sound on the print itself. In SDDS case the digital info was poorly placed and often wore out over time. I remember going into the booth and seeing all the SDDs processors on bypass with any older prints ....but yeah if you need spec info just look up DTS Digital Sound.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 03-05-2019 05:58 PM                     Then, you had the obscure 70mm only CDS. Pixel audio track printed on the film and no analog backup. The DTS-6 and DTS-6D drives were SCSI attached to a SX25 motherboard via SCSI controller card.  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 03-05-2019 06:12 PM                     Fuzzy drive sounds like a drive mechanism involving fuzzy logic... CDS was also available on 35mm, but it indeed replaced the analog audio tracks. It used awkward delta modulation on PCM tracks. I've never really heard the system in action, but I suppose the delta modulation must have sounded far worse than what DTS and Dolby had to offer. Anyway, it stored the audio on the primary playback medium, so there was no real reason to sync between both systems. IMAX's digital sound system for film was based on the DTS system, also using SMPTE time code to sync the sound playback system to film. The difference was, that they used uncompressed audio, while the standard DTS format used a compression similar to Dolby's AC3 (MP3) compression. quote: Armand Daiguillon Yeah, you're definitely thinking of DTS. It was one of the 3 digital sound formats of the time (least popular) the others were SDDS (sony) and Dolby Digital. DTS didn't really involve a soundcard. Although you could call the timecode signal an "audio signal", the DTS decoder could interpret the timecode from the reader directly. Also, I don't remember DTS to be a system that broke half of the time. It was, all in all, a pretty reliable playback system.  |  IP: Logged Brent Francis Film Handler Posts: 84 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Nov 2008 posted 03-06-2019 02:46 PM                        Thanks for all the info folks. We had DTS/SDDS/E-I-E-I-O and all that. But this was like trying to send the pulse signal to a separate audio player in another room that was patched into our speakers. It screwed up so often one gerbil, oops, I mean client, said "somebody's gonna get fired" if it didn't work. Thanks heavens it got better later! Cheers  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-06-2019 02:55 PM                        Was this something for postproduction or preview screenings? There are a few different devices that work like dubbers for synchronizing, say, a DA-88 tape or sound file on a hard disk to film. Tascam makes/made DA-88 and Fostex makes/made a hard disk recorder for that purpose. I have no idea if these were reliable or not. My only experience with such screenings is with 35mm dubbers (which seemed to work fine). I can't imagine anything as unreliable as the one mentioned here ever being used for mainstream releases in regular cinemas.  |  IP: Logged Brent Francis Film Handler Posts: 84 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Nov 2008 posted 03-06-2019 03:06 PM                        DA-88 maybe? Sounds familiar Anyway. Yes, I worked at a film lab where we did answer prints, previews & such. Thanks,  |  IP: Logged Sean McKinnon Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1712 From: Peabody Massachusetts Registered: Sep 2000 posted 03-06-2019 04:20 PM                        #1. CDS wasnt 70mm only #2. I think you are thinking of an unmarried interlock using a bi-phase shaft encoder either with a mag dubber or some other type of audio player.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-06-2019 07:44 PM                     Very early DTS Large Format players did use SCSI drives. Mark  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 03-08-2019 05:37 AM                     E-I-E-I-O? Like in Old MacDonald Had a Farm?  |  IP: Logged Dave Macaulay Film God Posts: 2321 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-08-2019 09:52 AM                     Early IMAX® digital sound was not DTS. In 1987 or so IMAX first commissioned a 6 channel CD based system that used three professional CD players (Tascam?) and normal Red Book CDs: this managed to get the players synced with sample accuracy, but the system had reliability issues. Then Sonics Associates produced a similar 3 CD system that was widely used. The sync source was a biphase shaft encoder on the projector: once the film was threaded with START in the aperture, a sync lock button is pressed - just like with the 35mm 6 channel mag dubbers IMAX used. IMAX 15/70 projectors are still manually synced to their sound player this way.  |  IP: Logged Brent Francis Film Handler Posts: 84 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Nov 2008 posted 03-08-2019 09:59 AM                        Hi again. Sorry 4 the delay. After it left our end, I had no clue since the audio dept. was separate from us & we didn't communicate much. All I really know is that it wasn't mag track because we had interlock for that. Thanks.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.