my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Emulsion-on-sound-drum projectors (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Emulsion-on-sound-drum projectors Simon Wyss Film Handler Posts: 80 From: Basel, BS, Switzerland Registered: Apr 2011 posted 12-17-2019 02:16 AM                     Hi, friends, I’d like to know more about 35mm projectors that have the sound head so oriented that prints wrap around the drum with the photographic layer next to it. That way constant focus is secured. In Europe there seems to be the Philips FP 20 alone. Among the American makes I know of DeVry. Are there any more brands?  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 12-17-2019 07:19 AM                        I last used one in 1998, so my memory may be failing me, but I have a dim recollection that the optical reader on the Gaumont-Kalee GK-37 is so arranged. If so, the unusual sound drum arrangement is likely because it was a Frankenprojector, cobbled together from the ashes of Rank's VistaVision adventure.  |  IP: Logged Mitchell Dvoskin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1869 From: West Milford, NJ, USA Registered: Jan 2001 posted 12-17-2019 11:30 AM                     An easier question would be what American projectors do not have the film's emulsion wound against the sound drum. As far as I know, none. All the major brands such as Simplex, Century were designed this way. This has never been a problem unless something is wrong with the projector's sound head, such as bad bearings or an off balance flywheel.  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-17-2019 12:36 PM                     I don’t think the 5-Star sound head works with the emulsion against the drum. The film wraps counter clockwise around the drum. If the film is threaded with the emulsion side facing the rear of the projector, that puts the base side against the drum. That stupid pinch roller is another kettle of fish. In fact I don’t remember any projector that I worked on to place the emulsion against the drum. Century. Simplex. Christie. I don’t even remember the Kinoton to be that way.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-17-2019 09:21 PM                     The Kinoton FP20/FP30 optical sound head is that way (original one). It also is susceptible to picking up the work light because the cell is "looking" forward. An advantage to the emulsion facing the drum is that focus isn't dependent on film thickness. The same was true of film gates. Straight gates let the emulsion side be the reference...curved gates, typically had the base side. Cinemeccanica sort of did a curved gate with the emulsion side as the reference.  |  IP: Logged Simon Wyss Film Handler Posts: 80 From: Basel, BS, Switzerland Registered: Apr 2011 posted 12-18-2019 01:03 AM                     Thanks, gentlemen, for the commitment. Since we’re at it, the Philips-Kinoton FP 20/23/30 have a curved gate, the convex part of it movable and the concave one rigid.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-18-2019 06:24 AM                     That is true...however, the runner strips on Kinoton are a wearable part that get thinner with use. So you do have focus drift over time as well as the aperture to film spacing changing as well. On the up side, as the skate and runners wear, they tend to get better with time...until the point that they wear out.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 12-18-2019 03:33 PM                     A point of clarity, I can't think of any major projector that has the emulsion against the sound drum. Absolutely Century, Simplex, Christie, etc does not. The base side is what is in contact with the sound drum. Now Simplex and RCA soundheads do have that dreadful pinch roller that is marvelous at adding wear to the emulsion of the image, but the base side of the film is what is against the sound drum itself.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-18-2019 07:36 PM                     Here is the DeVry, but with a red reader I retrofitted in. Normally the Exciter lamp is to the right and the photo tube or cell went inside the sound drum.  |  IP: Logged Emiel De Jong Film Handler Posts: 48 From: Geldrop The Netherlands Registered: Mar 2007 posted 12-19-2019 04:07 AM                     The older type FP20 / FP30 soundheads have emulsion side in contact with the drum, however image and sound area is not touched. The newer (reverse scan) soundheads are base side in contact with the drum.  |  IP: Logged Simon Wyss Film Handler Posts: 80 From: Basel, BS, Switzerland Registered: Apr 2011 posted 12-20-2019 02:14 AM                     quote: Emiel De Jong The older type FP20 / FP30 soundheads have emulsion side in contact with the drum That’s the reason for my asking, somebody on a German forum said it were the only such projector known to him. I thought to myself, not possible, someone must have had the idea before, I mean the FP 20 is from 1957-58 but optical sound is at least thirty years older. Emulsion-on-drum sound projectors are well known with 16mm film, Bell & Howell had it, Bauer, Siemens & Halske, Paillard-Bolex, RCA. Not Ampro, not Kodak, not Hortson  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-20-2019 07:23 AM                     16mm is a different animal. Unlike 35mm MOST 16mm prints had the emulsion facing the lens. It all depends on where your print was in the dupe-chain (how far away from the negative it was). Kinoton even had a lever on their FP16/FP18 and portables built off those mechanisms for changing the focus between standard/non-standard to compensate for emulsion in/out.  |  IP: Logged Kenneth Wuepper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1026 From: Saginaw, MI, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 12-20-2019 07:32 AM                     When servicing 16mm in the day, we had an SMPTE focus loop with half of the loop in each emulsion position and did a compromise focus balancing both positions. The oscilloscope was our best friend for this task. Basic service on RCA, Bell & Howell, Ampro and Eiki projectors.  |  IP: Logged Leo Enticknap Film God Posts: 7474 From: Loma Linda, CA Registered: Jul 2000 posted 12-20-2019 07:38 AM                        The printing and projection orientation of 16mm never had a global standard stick in the way that it did with 35. This is likely because it started as exclusively a reversal process (i.e. it was invented for home movies), and then negative-positive workflows in 16mm came later. The fact that 16mm was originally double perf, and then a single perf variant came along with sound could also have been part of that mix. So Kodak originally started with the base facing the lens (for projection), and later processes had the emulsion facing the lens. In the UK, at least, the latter were known as "DIN prints," (Deutsches Institut für Normung, a German technical standards organization that presumably defined a standard for 16mm release printing) and a BTH 16mm portable I once remember using actually had the optical photocell adjustment lever for flipping positions labeled "Standard" at one end and "DIN" at the other.  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 12-20-2019 07:59 AM                     quote: Leo Enticknap a BTH 16mm portable I once remember using actually had the optical photocell adjustment lever The Kodak Pageant projectors had a small lever for focusing the sound head optics depending on the orientation of the sound track. (or more correctly, the emulsion position) In the earlier(1950's) models, I believe it was actually labeled "FOCUS", but in later models it was labeled "FIDELITY" The levers were labeled "R" and "P" for "Reversal" and "Print" by a large university I worked at many years ago, since the student films could be one way or the other depending on how they were made, such as if they contained opticals, etc .  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.