|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Author
|
Topic: Dvd
|
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today
Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99
|
posted 08-30-2002 11:52 PM
Things I like about DVD:-I can watch it more than once without the picture getting all scratched and dirty. -It's video. If video is good enough for Steven Sodaburger it's probably too good for me. -The cases. Extra entertainment value is included in most DVD packaging in the form of spending countless hours peeling the stickers off of the top and bottoms. -The animated menus. Why would anyone want to put the disc in and just press play? That's stupid. Unskippable animated menus are definitely the best thing ever to grace my television screen. It's a known fact that they add a great deal of value to any DVD. -The copyright warnings. I was going to copy my DVDs for my friends, but since that copyright warning is unskippable I definitely won't now. -The compression. Wow, everything I love is compressed! DVD's, MP3's, DLP. Compression is obviously the most important advancement in history. Nobody notices the details anyway. How can they when there are none to notice?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 09-02-2002 10:37 AM
I know DVD isn't perfect, but it's the best medium there has ever been for watching movies at home. If you have a properly calibrated widescreen set that can take full advantage of anamorphic DVDs and do the inverse 3:2 telecine, your home viewing experience will be far greater than anything anyone ever dreamed of for video 10 years ago. Most DVD movies have an anamorphic transfer in the movies original aspect ratio, and in some cases, the DVD was my first opportunity to see a movie in its original aspect ratio (after seeing scope cropped to 1.85 in a couple of local theatres or seeing older movies on VHS or TV only). I know the presentation quality achievable with such a setup falls far short of a properly setup 35mm environment in a theatre, but my DVD setup will beat the Carmike Century Cinema 8 in Decatur most of the time (frequent focus, brightness, and alignment problems). A good DVD environment can beat a lousy theatre, and there are plenty of lousy theatres out there. I admit that I don't see as many movies in theatres as I used to. ------------------ Evans A Criswell Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Information Site
| IP: Logged
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 09-02-2002 11:53 AM
As I've said in other threads, I don't own a DVD player. I've often been tempted to buy one, but the prices keep going down, (saw one with SRD & DTS out, and Component video for $79) and the features are getting better on the more expensive ones. So i've decided to wait until those come down, too. There aren't any DVD titles out that would make me run out and get one, either. Speaking of the titles available, and this may not be true anymore, but releases were often reissued several times in better packaging, (remember DVDs in jewel cases?) a better disc, (no dual-layered discs early on) or a new director's cut or additional scenes, etc. Why didn't they do this on the original disc?!? Sometimes it's planned in advance, as is the case with Lord Of The Rings. In some cases, a new disc SHOULD be issued because the previous version is inferior. (There is still no widescreen version of Happy Gillmore available, or the Titanic DVD where the only real "extra" was the trailer.) True that the quality of the image on a DVD surpasses VHS, and this would be especially noticable in my screening room on a large screen, and the fact that my projector has Component inputs makes me really want to get one. But I feel I have more control over VHS. I can fast-forward past the FBI Warning and all that nonsense. I don't have to deal with a menu. I can have my screen masked to the correct aspect ratio for the film and not have to worry that the menu is fullscreen and would be partially on my cieling while I search for the "Play Movie" option. So I guess i'll wait until the format settles down and gets on a straight track. Oh, and when Warner Bros./New Line switch from that stupid cardboard packaging, and start listing the aspect ratio on the box. (instead of just "...the black bars at the top and bottom of your screen are normal" ) =TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 09-02-2002 12:14 PM
A quick side note...I noticed (according to Amazon.com) that the Neverending Story DVD will be released tomorrow, Sept. 3, and that it's 1.85:1 However, IMDB lists under "technical details" as 2.35:1, and a laserdisc release in 2.20:1. (I know, I know, IMDB is about as accurate as the National Enquierer.) So what's the real aspect ratio on this film? =TMP=
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 09-02-2002 12:49 PM
quote: "But I feel I have more control over VHS. I can fast-forward past the FBI Warning and all that nonsense. I don't have to deal with a menu. I can have my screen masked to the correct aspect ratio for the film and not have to worry that the menu is fullscreen and would be partially on my cieling while I search for the "Play Movie" option."
This is actually one of the main reasons why I dislike DVDs. Enough of the cutesy crap. When I press PLAY, just play the movie! Seeing that non-bypassable FBI logo just makes me want to copy the thing to spite them for making me sit through it. And what's with Universal? I watched a Universal DVD the other day and had to sit through a 60 second promo showing off their "fabulous" movies as well as the FBI logo before my player would give me control. Back when LaserDiscs were popular, I used to dupe them onto S-VHS just so I wouldn't have to deal with the intermission(s). I'm tempted to start doing that with DVDs. No FBI menu, no studio promos and no silly menus. Duping to D-VHS wouldn't lose a bit of quality either. Also if the movie is 1.85 letterboxed, at least have the courtesy when designing the silly Flash-like menu screens to keep all options within that frame. Same for 2.39 letterbox. Oh well, DVDs are overrated.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Chad Souder
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 962
From: Waterloo, IA, USA
Registered: Feb 2000
|
posted 09-02-2002 01:34 PM
I guess I feel that having to wait for an FBI warning doesn't even come remotely close to tipping the scales againt DVD. Like Evan said, it's the best medium ever for home. Random access, not having to rewind the damn thing every time, better picture, clear pauses, clear frame-by-frame, and better sound are just a few reasons why DVD is the best.Part of me wonders if some of you are against DVD's just because they're digital? Finally, if it wasn't for DVD, I would've never gotten that good CD recording of the film version of Pink Floyd, The Wall.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|