|
|
Author
|
Topic: Hannibal dvd edited: were those shots in the US theatrical cuts?
|
David Baum
Film Handler
Posts: 90
From: Brussels, Belgium
Registered: Aug 2000
|
posted 08-24-2001 12:15 AM
on www.hometheaterforum.com , software section, there's an open thread on this.We, in Europe, saw those shots in theaters. Can you guys comment on this, especially the Europeans ones as it seems very few US theaters managed to get an uncut print, if any. very controversial. the "studio" guys deny it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 08-24-2001 05:37 PM
That's kinda' funny. I was just reading a short article in the latest issue of Scientific American about a woman, Elizabeth Loftus, at the University of Washington who does research into how/why people remember some things and not others. She's an expert in the field of eyewitness testimony.She just completed some research where she took a group of people who had gone to Disney World and had a discussion about the things they had seen and done while at the Magic Kingdom. During the discussion, she "casually" talked about Bugs Bunny. Even though she never said that Bugs could be seen there, some of the test subjects reported that they had seen Bugs Bunny at Disney World. Of course, you and I know that this is 1000% IMPOSSIBLE! Bugs Bunny doesn't "live" at Disney World because he is a Warner Brother's character, not a Disney character! Never the less, some subjects SWORE that they had seen him there and some even reported that they actually shook hands with the Bugs Bunny costume character. What I am getting at is, considering Loftus' research, it's quite possible for people to "remember" actually seeing Hannibal cut off a slice of brain when they hadn't. I, personally, couldn't tell you whether it was shown or not. My memory isn't clear enough but I'll beleive Christopher. Thus, I'm willing to say that people who claim to have actually seen Hannibal cut off a piece of brain are victims of faulty memory. I will reserve my final opinion when all the facts are in, but I'm going to stick with this story until there is more information to the contrary. Personally, I think NOT showing the actual slicing is better. It's a lot like Hitchcock used to do... leaving certain things up to the viewer's imagination. Movies can be a LOT scarier/suspensful when you don't spell everything out. As much as I absolutely HATE HATE HATE The Blair Witch Project I must admit that it had one thing going for it, and that was the feeling of suspense you get when you don't know what/who is attacking the kids.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|