Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Swingers (1996)

   
Author Topic: Swingers (1996)
James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-16-2006 11:15 AM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
January 19, 2006
DVD viewing in my bedroom
8:15pm or so

I had heard so much about this movie ever since it came out about ten years ago.
For nearly a decade, any time this movie came up I got to hear "Aw man, you haven't seen Swinger? You gotta see it. You're so money!"
So my girlfriend and I put it in our Netflix que, it came in, and I watched it over the weekend.

You've got Mike (Jon Favreau) who sacrificed a 6 year relationship to move out to LA to pursue a career in acting and stand-up, a move that has yet to pay off.
Six months later, he's still not over his ex, but avoids calling her so as to not look foolish.
Mike's slick fast-talking buddy Trent (Vince Vaughn), in an effort to help him finally get over his relationship, urges him to hit the town(s) and meet women.
Trent is able to meet and pick-up women with ease while Mike stumbles over himself and turns women off.
Added to the mix are Rob (Ron Livingston) who likes to play ice hockey video games with Trent while they call each other Bithch and fucker a lot, Sue (Patrick Van Horn) who is named after a Johnny Cash song, and Charles (Alex Desert) who thinks every party is dead anyway.

The movie has its moments here and there, (the calling card and the caravaning between bars and parties were mildly funny) but for the most part, I was just annoyed.
"You're so money. You're so money. You're so money and you don't even know it."
I mean shut up already.
You're so annoying and you'll probably never even know it.
The bear and the bunny thing might be funny if I saw it again, but at the time all I could think about is just how dumb those guys were.
In one scene, as they are leaving a bar, Sue gets bumped by some homie and an argument over who is or is not a bitch ensues.
Sue pulls a gun and they all run back into their car and drive off giving him the finger as they drive away.
I don't know about you, but if I had a gun pointed at me, I'd keep my fingers to myself.
And somehow, two days later they are friends and playing video games together.
Whatever.

I did feel bad for him when he got the number from that one girl (was it Nikki, I can't remember) and it looked as if there was hope for him, only to have him screw it up by calling her ten times in a row.
I've been overzealous before and I know how it feels to fuck up what could be a good thing.

SPOILER WARNING

I didn't even start to like the movie until near the end when Mike meets Lorraine (Heather Graham).
I thought their dance scene was really good.
Made me wish I knew more of that swingin' rockabilly type of music.
Also made me wish I knew how to dance like that (or at all).
I had that "Oh no" feeling when his ex called but Mike pulls through and decides to start over with Lorraine.

I think that the extra characters got in the way of this movie and that it would have been better off as a short film.

I give it 2 out of 5.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Jorgenson
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1002
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: Feb 2005


 - posted 01-16-2006 03:32 PM      Profile for Jeremy Jorgenson   Author's Homepage   Email Jeremy Jorgenson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is this a new version? Or why 2006 after the title?

 |  IP: Logged

James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-16-2006 04:27 PM      Profile for James R. Hammonds, Jr   Email James R. Hammonds, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry, I was thinking wrong, but I've corrected it.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.