|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut
|
|
|
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 11-08-2006 06:26 PM
From the DVD press release:
quote:
"Superman II: The Richard Donner Cut" will delight fans who, for years, have been imploring Warner Home Video via voluminous numbers of petitions, letters, phone calls and e-mails to release the Donner cut. In fact, Donner had already shot most of the "Superman II" footage during [the production of] "Superman: The Movie." But as production on the sequel continued, creative differences between the director and the film's producers became irreconcilable and Donner left the project.
Although Richard Lester ["A Hard Day's Night," "The Three Musketeers"] was hired to finish production, he chose to make major changes to the film, leaving only vestiges of Donner's original vision and concepts in the version of "Superman II" that was ultimately released to theaters.
Now, nearly thirty years later, Warner Home Video is honored to grant the wishes of countless Superman fans. With this DVD release, Richard Donner has become the first director in history to be able to complete a film he left during production with nearly all his footage "in the can." Adding back a substantial amount of that unused footage, the director has seen his original vision restored and brought to fruition.
Most notably, the "Donner cut" restores the Marlon Brando role, filmed for, but not included in the final theatrical release version of "Superman II." The legendary Brando's performance as Jor-El has finally been restored in key scenes that amplify Superman lore and deepen the profound relationship between father and son.
With so many changes, large and small, including a variety of Lois Lane (Margot Kidder) schemes to unmask Clark Kent as Superman, this "Superman II" will prove to be an eye-opening experience and an important addition to film history.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001
|
posted 11-08-2006 07:05 PM
Yes, the spinning the earth thing is in the new cut. During the Q&A that followed the premiere screening, it was explained that as originally scripted the spinning the earth thing appeared only once and was used near the climax of what would become the second film.
SPOILER ALERT Superman does the turning back time thing to wipe out Lois Lane's knowledge of Clark Kent being Superman. In the version we've all seen up to this point, you'll recall Superman takes care of this plot point with a kiss.
Does the new cut work? I think so. But to be certain I'll need to watch it again and then re-watch the theatrical cut and compare. I think it's definitely worth checking out just for curiosity. It was fascinating to see all "new' scenes as well as familiar scenes that featured alternate takes and/or different editing or music. Some of the visual effects, however, were downright horrible! What was very apparent was that films I and II were conceived as one big story. I'm not sure they could've gotten away with originally releasing a 4 to 4 1/2 hour movie, but the "Donner Cut" plays like a second half, whereas my recollection of the theatrical version of "II" is that it played like another movie entirely. To follow up on Monte's questions, here's an excerpt from an old Los Angeles Times article. The article, published Dec. 7, 1980 and written by Roderick Mann, was primarily about Donner's then about-to-be-released film "Inside Moves" but included a great deal of material related to his Superman experience.
quote:
“I went through a bad period after I finished directing ‘Superman,’” said Dick Donner. “I had terrible ill feelings about the business and the people in it. I felt I didn’t want to work again. Normally, I’m a fairly happy-go-lucky person, but my fights with the Salkinds had depressed me utterly.”
Donner, who was dismissed as director of “Superman 2” after his battles with the producers, Alex and Ilya Salkind and Pierre Spengler, learned recently that although much of Part 2 was shot in tandem with Part 1, his name would not be on the credits of the new film. Sole directing credit goes to Richard Lester, who took over the reigns after Donner was taken off the project.
Donner has now had a pivate screening of “Superman 2.” According to him much of the footage he shot for the second film has now been junked. Contractually, he says, he was entitled to director credit on Part 2, so this forms part of the multimillion-dollar lawsuit he has brought against the producers.
“I suppose I’d shot almost 80% of Part 2 while we were filming Part 1,” said Donner, drinking coffee in his office the other morning. “And frankly I felt Part 2 was even better than Part 1. For one thing, we were no longer burdened with the task of explaining the fable.
“But now they’ve cut out so much of what I shot, obviously to keep it below the amount which would have necessitated giving me screen credit. And Marlon (Brando) is out of the film altogether. That’s such an injustice to the man. After all it was his name which gave the project credibility to the investment community in the first place.”
According to Donner, it was six months before he was able to surface after the “Superman” experience.
“At least that. I became something of a hermit. I did a lot of drinking, winding up with hangovers. Remember, I’d put 2 ˝ years of my life into ‘Superman,’ and that’s a long time when you get to be my age (50).
“So I felt hostile and angry. I had very little love left for anybody, and what I had I didn’t want to share. Coupled with that was the feeling of having been cheated. I’d hoped ‘Superman’ would prove to be my nest egg. Now these legal hassles with the Salkinds mean it will be years before I get my money.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|