Film-Tech Cinema Systems
  Home     Products     Store     Forum     Warehouse     Contact Us    
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » DTV downconveter (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: DTV downconveter
Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999

- posted 02-14-2008 07:35 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was at a Wallmart today and saw the first DTV down converter (that I have seen) that is part of the FCCs $40 off coupon program, and even says so on the box. It is a Magnavox, and is priced at $50, so you could buy one for $10 if you have one of those $40 off coupons. It is a very simple little box. There are no buttons on the box, everything must be done from the remote. On the back there is antenna in and out, and composite video and stereo audio out. There was not much information on the box itself. It was the desire of the FCC that these things be simple, so that grandma could hook it up herself, and be able to watch her soaps Feb. 17, 2009; just slightly more than a year from now.

The $40 off coupons should be coming out soon, if you have ordered them. If you don't have cable or satellite, you can order your coupons at www.dtv2009.gov

 |  IP: Logged
Jesse Skeen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1517
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: Aug 2000

- posted 02-15-2008 01:34 AM      Profile for Jesse Skeen   Email Jesse Skeen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What, no RF output?? What about all the people who haven't been able to figure out direct video inputs, even though they've been pretty much standard on TVs made since 1985?

This shows why you don't need one anyways: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BChnI33tDvs

I'd rather go back to black-and-white than watch HDTV with all the crap they put on the screen.

 |  IP: Logged
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99

- posted 02-15-2008 05:21 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Old people don't deserve to watch TV. They should be working 45 hours a week, earning their keep. If they did this, they'd all be able to buy that new HDTV and wouldn't have to worry about the downconverter in order to see Golden Girls HD Edition.

 |  IP: Logged
Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999

- posted 02-15-2008 01:50 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess I hould have been clearer, the antenna out is an RF output.

 |  IP: Logged
James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006

- posted 02-21-2008 04:19 AM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I got one. It works quite well.

 |  IP: Logged
Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005

- posted 02-21-2008 05:22 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Doesn't the HD penetration have to be 85% before the analog turn off?

Also, should the Gov. be in the Entertainment business; maybe they'll pay for D=Cinema? Louis

 |  IP: Logged
Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002

- posted 02-21-2008 05:44 PM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
Doesn't the HD penetration have to be 85% before the analog turn off?
Nope, February 16, 2009 is the last day that analog TV will be broadcast over the air. Of course there will still be plenty sent via cable and plenty of SD crap on satellite, cable and certain OTA stations that refuse to broadcast in HD.

 |  IP: Logged
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99

- posted 02-21-2008 06:09 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It has nothing to do with HD. It's digital, not HD. All TVs sold today have digital tuners whether they are HD or not.

 |  IP: Logged
James Westbrook
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1133
From: Lubbock, Texas, Usa
Registered: Mar 2006

- posted 02-21-2008 09:30 PM      Profile for James Westbrook   Email James Westbrook   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In regards to the government subsidizing the converter boxes...
I did not apply for the coupons from the government to pay for mine. (I bought my second one today.) I do not feel that television is a necessity, and the government should not be subsidizing this. (Just my own personal belief.)
Digital, in my situation, provides an excellent over-the-air picture. I feel the $50 cost per box is worth it.

 |  IP: Logged
Scott McGuire
Film Handler

Posts: 94
From: Elmira, NY/United States
Registered: Oct 2007

- posted 02-22-2008 12:41 AM      Profile for Scott McGuire   Email Scott McGuire   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did the government make it law that all signal should be converted to digital? If so then they should subsidize the downcoverter if not then they shouldn't. If you have cable that uses a "box" you don't even need to buy the converter so i don't think many people will need to buy one anyway. If you are old you have worked all of you life and deserve to retire, so collect your pension and go get a downconverter, no need to worry about working 45 hours a week.

 |  IP: Logged
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999

- posted 03-08-2008 01:35 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As for the government subsidizing the converters....they are the ones mandated digital transmission. I have no problem with them "fixing" all the analog sets that will become "broken" due to their mandate. The thing of course that is maddening, is that it's our dime that is funding these coupons for the converters.

And the question is a valid one....why was the govenment mandating digital transmission in the first place? What's it there business? Was our homeland security being threatened because our TV broadcast stations were transmitting analog? Were people being hurt or even inconvenienced because of the way TV has been transmitted for more than half a century? If digital was so necessary, why didn't the marketplace damand it? It was an artificial problem that the governement had no business butting it's nose into. Fix the energy crisis, damn it and let the broadcast industry worry about its signals.

And as mentioned, digital doesn't even mean hi-def. OTA stations could still broadcast standard def, unless, of course, the government butts in again where they have no business and start demanding a cutoff date for standard def images.

Imagine if the governement sent out an edict that by such and such a date, all theatres had to install digital projectors (not that the studios would object), but that's essentially what they did to the broadcasters. IT'S NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS. It's the entertainment business....leave it alone; they were doing just fine without governmental buttinski-ism.

 |  IP: Logged
Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001

- posted 03-11-2008 08:40 AM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Received my two government issued coupons, actually they are more like gift cards, last week.

 |  IP: Logged
Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000

- posted 03-11-2008 10:02 AM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
And the question is a valid one....why was the govenment mandating digital transmission in the first place? What's it there business?
Money! The federal government can't wait to clear the present VHF TV broadcast spectrum because of all the money they will take in when they auction off that spectrum to the highest bidders.

And it is the federal government's business, since they decide and police jurisdiction over the RF spectrum in the US. The FCC deals with most of this stuff in the US, in conjunction with the ITU which coordinates RF spectrum policies internationally.

Follow the money.

 |  IP: Logged
Sean McKinnon
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1712
From: Peabody Massachusetts
Registered: Sep 2000

- posted 03-11-2008 02:03 PM      Profile for Sean McKinnon   Author's Homepage   Email Sean McKinnon   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Frank Angel
Was our homeland security being threatened because our TV broadcast stations were transmitting analog?
I don't know if this qualifies but I think the justification for this was so they could take the old spectrum to use for "official" communications.

 |  IP: Logged
Bruce Hansen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 847
From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA
Registered: Dec 1999

- posted 03-11-2008 04:35 PM      Profile for Bruce Hansen   Email Bruce Hansen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Paul Mayer
The federal government can't wait to clear the present VHF TV broadcast spectrum because of all the money they will take in when they auction off that spectrum to the highest bidders.
VHF will still be for TV. It is channels 52 to 69 that are going to be auctioned off. This is the 700 Mhz band, this is what the computer flakes, and the cell phone companies want. VHF has too many problems for what these companies want to do, such as skip, and impulse noise.

link
quote:
The 700 MHz spectrum was previously used for analog television broadcasting, specifically UHF channels 52 through 69. The FCC has ruled that the impending switch to digital television will make these frequencies no longer necessary for broadcasters, due to the improved spectral efficiency of digital broadcasts [1]. Thus, all broadcasters will be required to move to channels 2 through 51 as part of the digital TV transition.

 |  IP: Logged


All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
- Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.