|
|
Author
|
Topic: how does HDMI prevent piracy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 06-18-2008 11:54 PM
quote: Charles Greenlee Cause we're dealing with 21st century Nazis. Better lern to goose step. Limiting the devices and media to depend solely on HDCP, and barring them from older or analog devices would cut into what I can enjoy for sure.
It bears repeating that no movie studio has released any movies on Blu-ray that utilize the Image Constraint Token. Viewers with an older HDTV with component inputs will still be able to see the movie in HD, not down-rezzed.
I have no problem with the notion of using copy protection on Blu-ray. I also get the feeling many of the people complaining about the copy protection on Blu-ray are among the crowd who believe they should be able to see and collect any and all movies free of charge.
My day job involves creating computer graphics. I have to send sketches to clients, usually in PDF. I take all kinds of steps to copy protect the artwork in those files -everything from password protecting the PDF to doing nasty stuff to the artwork the client won't notice but will create a major pain in the ass for any thieving rival wanting to reuse my original artwork for his own gain. I'm not working for free. No one is getting my artwork for free and getting paid from it either.
The aspects I do not like about the copy protection system on HDMI in general is it lays down the ground work for content creators to usher in a pay per every view model for movies and other forms of recorded entertainment. HDMI and LAN connected devices have a LOT of abuse potential.
If I buy a movie on disc I'm buying it once and that's it. I'm not paying for that same disc all over again at a later date. But the infrastructure was built into both high def movie disc formats for movie studios to pull such a stunt when they thought the time was safe enough to do so. I think movie fans need to make it clear to the studios they'll be very sorry if they move to that. We have not forgotten the shit pulled with DiVX.
Even the Image Constraint Token feature is a potential public relations disaster if it is ever put into effect. There's still a lot of HDTVs in service that lack HDMI connections or HDCP compliant DVI connections.
Image quality is another worthy gripe on copy protection. The encryption in formats like Blu-ray is not visible. Stuff like Cap Code on 35mm film prints or Macrovision on old analog tapes is visible.
quote: Charles Greenlee While I have acess to other TV's, the only TV to my name isn't even cable ready. Though works good if adapted with something like a VCR, or a converter. Better than some current analog TVs. My monitor is an analog CRT.
I guess the HDMI issue doesn't affect you yet, Charles. Most new movie disc playback devices, even a lot of Blu-ray players and PS3, have legacy connections like composite and S-Video to support old NTSC TV sets. You just won't get anything "HD" over those connections, and may have to set up the device to output 480p as well.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|