my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Blockiness in progressive scan; what causes this?

Author Topic: Blockiness in progressive scan; what causes this? Tom Mundell Expert Film Handler Posts: 120 From: Silver Spring, MD, USA Registered: Nov 2007 posted 09-16-2008 07:05 PM                        I've come across a few dvd's that display exceptionally poorly on my DLP tv with Panasonic Blu-Ray player or Pioneer dvd player. For whatever reason, the picture is very blocky. This doesn't happen on a standard def tv in interlaced mode, so I'm assuming there's something odd going on when the picture is being de-interlaced. The worst offender is my Lexx dvd's which are blocky throughout the whole show. I have other tv shows that display more or less fine, so I'm wondering what is it about these particular dvd's that cause the problem that other dvd's don't have? I tried to take a few pictures to illustrate: Actually I think the problem looks a lot worse than in those small pictures; Here's a closeup that may better show the problem: I don't know if there's any way to eliminate this, I haven't figured it out yet; I tried all the de-interlacing options available and nothing helps.  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 09-16-2008 08:06 PM                        You are playing video sources that were interlaced to begin with and it must deinterlace each field to display properly in 480p. So basically each field is doubled and that gives it the blocky effect. Interlaced video contains only half the information as progressive video at the same "resolution". True 480p video won't look blocky at all, only interlaced. Interlacing is evil, it serves no purpose and should be against the law and punishable by extreme pain.  |  IP: Logged Tom Mundell Expert Film Handler Posts: 120 From: Silver Spring, MD, USA Registered: Nov 2007 posted 09-16-2008 08:29 PM                        Why does this extreme level of blockiness seem to be much more noticable in this particular show though? I have other tv shows on dvd which I would expect to also be interlaced that look significantly better; offhand Seinfeld and The West Wing come to mind, the dvd's for both of those don't have nearly this level of blockiness and look like pretty much like most of my dvd's upscaled. (or were these shows filmed giving them a progressive source to go back to when creating the dvd vs. Lexx being 'filmed' on video? Can't say I know much about how modern tv shows are created...)  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 09-16-2008 08:45 PM                        Seinfeld and West Wing were shot on film. The DVDs are naturally progressive. The show in your pictures was likely shot on video.  |  IP: Logged Tom Mundell Expert Film Handler Posts: 120 From: Silver Spring, MD, USA Registered: Nov 2007 posted 09-16-2008 08:50 PM                        Ah, ok, thanks; that makes sense then.  |  IP: Logged Charles Greenlee Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 801 From: Savannah, Ga, U.S. Registered: Jun 2006 posted 09-16-2008 10:03 PM                        Interlacing is/was necessary to deal with the limited bandwidth of the broadcast signal. Otherwise you'd have to put up with a picture progressively scanned, but with half the apparent resolution, or one progressively scanned at half the frame rate. I think it was a brilliant solution at the time, just now antiquated and obsolete.  |  IP: Logged Joe Redifer You need a beating today Posts: 12859 From: Denver, Colorado Registered: May 99 posted 09-16-2008 10:42 PM                        The people who invented TV were idiots. They should have tried harder. And that's all there is to it!  |  IP: Logged Jesse Skeen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1517 From: Sacramento, CA Registered: Aug 2000 posted 09-17-2008 04:33 AM                     I'm contemplating getting a rear-projection DLP but I'm wondering how old stuff is going to look on it. If it looks worse than it does on a regular picture tube I'm going to be mad. I'll be getting a Blu-Ray player but will still want to be able to watch all my Beta, VHS, CEDs and laserdiscs in all their analog glory. When I go TV-shopping I'm going to be carrying along a DVD with old stuff transferred from Betamax tapes with things like this: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8260939633013344840  |  IP: Logged Damien Taylor Master Film Handler Posts: 493 From: Perth, Western Australia Registered: Apr 2007 posted 09-17-2008 04:55 AM                     In my personal experience, laserdisc/CED and VHS/Beta look like poo on anything but a CRT  |  IP: Logged Anslem Rayburn Master Film Handler Posts: 476 From: Yuma, AZ, USA Registered: May 2002 posted 09-17-2008 05:51 AM                     Standard definition programming looks awful on HD sets. I have a 51" Hitachi CRT rear projector which I bough about 2 years ago and love. But SD stuff looks fuzzy and muddy on it. When I have to watch something in standard definition, I use the trusty old Sony 27" CRT. That thing has a pretty good picture for SD stuff. [ 10-14-2008, 07:05 PM: Message edited by: Anslem Rayburn ]  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.