Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Sleeping Beauty BD Tech Extras

   
Author Topic: Sleeping Beauty BD Tech Extras
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 10-14-2009 09:06 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why do so many discs get basic film technology so wrong on extra materials. I've seen some pretty good (if incomplete) information about Toidd-AO and Cinemascope 55, but sometimes info is just plain wrong, and it is especially irritating when it is being given out by the actual people involved with the restorations. On the SLEEPING BEAUTY BD, there is a section on restoring the sound. It is mentioned that FANTASIA was the "first multi-channel film, a pre-curser to today's surround sound." OK, As good as it goes.

But then the same restorer says that "SLEEPING BEAUTY was the first true stereo soundtrack...you have 2 channels of audio, but the way these things are miked and reproduced, it gives you an image in the center that isn't really there. That's true stereo."

HUH??? Wouldn't the 70mm prints of SLEEPING BEAUTY have been 6-channel? (or at the very least 4?)

Thjey also talked about the challenge of matching the dialog and sound effects, which were recorded magnetically, with the music score...big disparity there.

Again, I would have assumed that the music would have been recorded magnetically, although they may have been saying that the music was the original session tapes while the dialog and music may have gone down several generations. But this went unexplained.

And then they compared an original clip with a very high pitched cycle noise with scratches and pops to show what they had to work with. Yet I've seen Sleeping Beauty in several formats before, and did not notice this bad state (everything from VHS to 70mm (at the El Capitan). Do they just use worse case examples to show the hard work (and I don't deny that it is a lot of hard work to restore) just to illustrate to the public? If so, I think they do a diservice to wrongly educate.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.