|
|
Author
|
Topic: High Def TV's. Which would buy?
|
|
|
|
|
Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."
Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001
|
posted 02-11-2010 10:16 AM
Not all LED back-lit LCD televisions are created equal. The less expensive models (such as the ones sold by Samsung) are only "edge lit" using White LEDs. They do sport better color accuracy than the LCD televisions back-lit with cold cathode fluorescent lamps. And they consumer significantly less power. Unfortunately, those same TV sets have a more narrow "sweet spot" of viewing angle and suffer from uneven brightness levels and blue-tinged blacks in imagery.
Some higher end televisions, such as Sony's Bravia XBR8 model, are back-lighted using Red, Green and Blue LED clusters. RGB LEDs will provide a wider color gamma range, superior black levels and better viewing angles. Naturally this approach costs quite a bit more money.
I'm "in the market" again for a good quality, large HDTV set. However, I'm not going to buy anything to truly replace the 52" Sony Bravia XBR4 TV set stolen from my home a few days ago until a good number of the 3D capable HDTV sets arrive in stores. Panasonic and Samsung may have 3D capable models in stores by this Spring and Sony plans to have its new line of 3D capable Bravia TV sets in stores sometime during summer.
Meanwhile, this past Sunday I bought something more modest just to get through the next few months: a 40" Samsung Series 630 LCD-TV set. It was on sale for around $875 at Sears (no interest & no payments for 1 year). It's a 120Hz TV set with 4 HDMI ports, 2 USB ports, a LAN port and computer monitor port too. The TV set's picture quality is pretty decent, but not nearly as good as my previous Bravia XBR4 TV set. Black levels aren't nearly as deep and the color quality is just more electronic looking than natural. But that's what you get with an entry level HDTV set.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Mike Olpin
Chop Chop!
Posts: 1852
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 02-11-2010 02:06 PM
Plasma - still the best, but not terribly energy efficient according to some. Others would argue differently. They usually cost a lot more and put off more heat.
LCD - Tend to suffer from poor contrast when compared to plasmas. Color can be uneven at times, especially on less expensive or store brand models. Beware of contrast ratios that look to good to be true. Manufactures are cheating by "inking out" black pixels, a technique that works well for still images, but not for video.
LED - Basically, its still an LCD tv, but the method used to light the lcd panel is different. As Bobby mentioned, not all are equal. Look for local dimming, a feature which selectively dims or turns off LEDs located in a region of black or dark picture. This feature will dramatically improve contrast, as the light behind a black pixel can be turned completely off. Some reviewers say that the experience can be comparable to plasma.
If I were in the market to buy today, I would choose the high end Samsung LED. Personally, I'm holding out until 3D for the home calms down a little. Right now, I don't want to be stuck with something that requires active glasses, as all the sets currently on the market do.
This is the model I'm drooling over at the moment..
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003
|
posted 02-12-2010 04:17 PM
Local dimming can also cause a problem where the sensitivity of when a particular area should be dimmed can be questionable. Take any scenes of a starry night. Some sets will remove the stars from the image because there is so little light in that part of the image, the circuitry believes that it is completely dark and therefore decides to dim that area too greatly, resulting in no stars.
I bought a 40" Sony 40V5100 for ~$900 back in August and it's not perfect, but since it was for a living room TV setup and not my primary movie-watching location, additional cost for more performance wasn't necessary. It took me some time to dial in the settings to a point where I was happy with the picture quality, but I'm happy enough with it for the purpose it serves.
If I were looking for a primary movie watching display, I'd be more selective. The higher-end plasmas would definitely be worth looking at, but then you're talking $2000-$3000 for a 50+ inch set, which isn't pocket change.
Watch out for the Panasonic Viera sets that are elevating black levels by design after so many hours of use:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1167339
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|