|
|
Author
|
Topic: Undecided about LOST Season 6
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 08-24-2010 03:21 AM
Claude, I bailed out on these guys around season 3. If a film makes you work hard and requires you to apply yourself intellectually, then there had better be a payoff at the end. I wasn't getting much satisfaction with this thing and I soon got the feeling that it was obtuse and inaccessible for its own sake. In other words, that was their hook -- they wanted the talk at the water cooler to be "Did you understand what was going on in LOST last night. I couldn't figure out what was going on?" Exactly, and the reason is that you didn't because you couldn't -- the clues all led, not in a direction that would eventually return back to what you had already been revealed, but in circles to nowhere.
I don't consider myself a slouch when it comes to running with whatever a director will throw at me, no matter how difficult -- hell, I've even stuck with Resnais' mental callisthenics with LAST YEAR AT MARIENBAD and the equally difficult and bizarre HIROSHIMA MON AMOUR, both nearly indecipherable, but in the end, I was satisfied that my time was well spent. LOST won't deliver the same satisfaction.
From what I hear -- and I admit, this is only hearsay -- but from people who I respect in terms of their taste in movies, and they said after all these meandering storyline paths that had been thrown out during the course of the series, there is no real payoff -- it's the movie equivalent of coitus interuptus.
Thing is, you've invested so much in this that if it were me, I would probably go for it anyway -- who knows, you might find somthing in it that works for you that others may not.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mark Ogden
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 943
From: Little Falls, N.J.
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 08-24-2010 06:09 AM
I would guess that the vast majority of Lost fans were disappointed in Season Six and the end of the show. It was very clear to me, at least, that the writers had pretty much been making the whole show up as they went along, and then in the final season scrambled to come up with a way to wrap it up without causing too much fan outrage. They failed, as far as I’m concerned. Does it become easier to understand as it goes along? Not really, because a great deal changes after the event that takes place in the last few seconds of Season Five. Entire sub-plots that ran the whole length of the show were discarded (for instance, the whole Dharma Initiative thing seems to have been meaningless in the grand scheme of things, and the “magic numbers” would up not meaning much of anything either), un-important characters were disposed of quickly, and an entirely brand new rational for the characters to be on the island was introduced. Plus, there was a lot of padding of the individual character’s story lines that had to be waded through to get to the final episode. Bad writing all around and a piss-poor way to end the show, IMHO.
Still, it wasn’t horrible to watch, and if you have this much time invested in the characters you could probably see it through to the end without becoming too bored. I understand that the DVD set of Season 6 contains significant extra material that adds further explanation to the ending. Just don’t expect a pay-off on everything that went before.
Interesting that Frank brings up one of my favorite films, Last Year at Marienbad, because (depending on your interpation, of course) it covers a lot of the same thematic ground as the last few episodes of Lost.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Mark J. Marshall
Film God
Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 08-24-2010 07:56 AM
I don't agree with the creators making things up as they went along. They clearly had a plan from the start as is evidenced by things paying off two or three seasons later. Yes, season 3 was disappointing - partially because the writers were too busy bellyaching about something instead of working.
I have to admit that as a die hard fan, season six's finale did kind of make me say, "huh?" But after reading about it, and thinking about it, everything started to make sense, and it grew on me. I can now say that I enjoyed season six. I don't feel cheated in any way with the ending. After all the whole show was about making the viewers say, "huh?" so why should the ending be any different? I don't mind intellectual shows that go to the level that this one did. I enjoy having to think about things and figure them out, and this show has been great making me do that from day one. Other people may have different thresholds on what is "too much required thinking".
So no, Claude I don't think you'll find season six to be a waste of money in the end. No, everything is NOT tied up in a nice neat little bow at the end. I don't at all feel cheated with the numbers, or with Dharma.
As far as the acting goes, Terry O'Quinn is phenomenal. He has to basically play different roles - or versions - of Locke. And his acting is brilliant. The others are all on top of their game too. Some of the episodes are tear jerkers. Some episodes will leave you with nothing to say but "wow".
Can you tell I liked it?
I'll be buying it. Now that I have seen the end I want to go back and watch it all again to pick up on things that I might have missed.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|