Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » The Afterlife   » Obama signed the CALM act -- no more loud commercials

   
Author Topic: Obama signed the CALM act -- no more loud commercials
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-07-2011 12:01 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
....or so they say. This from the CBS website:

quote:
TV viewers, rejoice: You'll no longer get blown out of your seat by the difference in volume between the television program you're watching and the commercials that air during it.

On Wednesday President Obama signed into law the "Commercial Advertisement Loudness Mitigation" or "CALM Act." A press release from the White House states the law "requires the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a regulation limiting the volume of audio on commercials transmitted by television broadcast stations, cable operators, and other multichannel video programming distributors."

The House passed the bill by a voice vote on Dec. 2. It was passed the Senate unanimously in September. The FCC will start enforcing the new rules within a year.

Consumers have complained to the FCC about loud commercials for decades, and Rep. Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.) told the Wall Street Journal in December that the CALM Act is the most popular piece of legislation she's sponsored in her 18 years in Congress. "If I'd saved 50 million children from some malady, people would not have the interest that they have in this," she said.

For now, the FCC has a webpage on the subject, which advises consumers, "Manually controlling volume levels with the remote control remains the simplest approach to reducing excessive volume levels."

I just wonder how does this discrepancy originate in the first place. It is nowhere near that bad on broadcast TV, only cable seems to have the affliction. I contend that this is no accident; those super loud commercials are made loud because someone somewhere is doing it on PURPOSE. My cynical mind is thinking it could be as sinister as broadcasters and cable operators getting paid under the table to purposely boost commercial volume. You don't pay, your commercial gets the same level as the program. You slip us a couple a smooth 10Gs for every 2db we boost and you get your ad that much hotter than the program audio.

I mean, we used to have reference levels - what happened to zero db? In audio every medium seems to have very uniform reference levels. When I was mastering programs for FM syndication, you never had to worry about LP levels, for example, being all over the map, and we spent serious alignment time making sure all our Ampex master recorders and dubbers all were aligned to Ampex reference. When we sent them out to the stations, tapes couldn't be have varying levels all over the place if we wanted to stay in business.

You can't tell me that when a commercial comes on twice as hot as the program that some deliberate effing around is being done. The guys in the control room can certainly hear that the commercial is blasting over the program level. And even if there is no one monitoring anything at all and it's all automated, then whatever happened to limiters and compressors and the even more sophisticated computer programs that can do every conceivable type of audio manipulation that the mind can conceive?

The SMPTE in NYC is holding this month's meeting specifically about the CALM Act. I will attend to see what they have to say, especially what the explanation is for why we are at this state of affairs to begin with because it wasn't always like this. Maybe all the CLAM Act needs to do is say, "Do whatever you were doing in 1980."

Now all we have to do is wait to see how they fix it and then whatever piece of equipment they come up with to smash down the commercial audio, we stick that in the projection booths for the damn trailers!

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 01-07-2011 12:40 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Frank: I don't think there is a volume conspiracy.

I do think that incompetence/not caring is real.

My personal problem is CBS Sunday Morning. Commercials are loud/program is sedate. Limiters don't help. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-07-2011 02:52 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This is just an observation from a Broadcast Audio tragic, but isn't it usually the case where loud commercials also have a lower dynamic range? I can understand why they do this as a high ratio between the soft/loud parts aren't really what the advertisers want. They want "cut-through".

I remember reading Broadcast Audio magazine in the 80's where the latest and greatest 'must-have' buggary box was the Audio Exiter. My interpretation of it then was it is just an A.V.C/Compressor set to 11 and compressed the hell out of the program material.

So my question is are these types of things still in use, or are there other boxes doing the same type of thing, and can these be blamed for the problem CALM is supposed to fix?

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 01-07-2011 02:56 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe the problem is deliberate, just like overly loud movie trailers and popular music CDs being mastered way the hell too loud.

I don't think people running the master control boards at cable companies or TV stations are actively cranking the volume during the commercials and lowering it when the program resumes. I think the way too hot volume is being cooked into the TV commercials.

Infomercials are bad about cranked volume too. For example, some nights I'll watch shows on Comedy Central before going to bed. The TV is running at a reasonable volume. When I turn on the TV in the morning "paid programming" is usually running on Comedy Central at a LOUD volume. Sometimes I'll think ahead late at night and either turn the TV volume way down low or switch the channel to something without TV commercials (like HBO). That way I don't get an unpleasant jolt of TV volume when I'm halfway awake.

It will be interesting to see how this law is enforced. Frankly I'm skeptical it will be enforced at all.

 |  IP: Logged

Hillary Charles
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 748
From: York, PA, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 01-07-2011 02:59 PM      Profile for Hillary Charles   Email Hillary Charles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Years ago, I recall reading that when one of Barbra Streisand's movies ("Yentl" maybe) was getting a network showing, she supposedly contacted someone at the network to make sure the commercials were no louder than her movie.

It does seem they want us to pay attention to the commercials by making them louder, but that ploy backfires with us---if the commercials are too loud, we mute them! [evil]

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-07-2011 03:31 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The commercials seem louder usually because there isn't a bunch of fast-talking and cheesy music in the program you were watching, so the program seems quieter than it is. Plus, the commercials are very abrupt and sudden with lots of sound packed in a short time frame. It's the same thing with movie trailers. What they need to do is just record that shit at -3db compared to everything else (-6db would be preferred.) Commercials/trailers should not be allowed to approach the loudness of the program/feature.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-07-2011 03:54 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Technically, I would assume everything is recorded and played back at 100% tone but there's more to it than that and human intervention is needed. Unfortunately, seeing as it's all automated now that's not going to happen.

When I was switching shows on-air, I played the programs at 100% and had to pull the ad content down to around 40% to have it 'seem' to play at the same level. The limiter did not take into account the clarity of locally made ads compared to the 16mm print audio quality we just came out of. Even normal shows off tape had differing quality levels that the limiter could not possibly take into account. Also the limiter would 'see' that I'd pulled the level down and try to compensate.

I used to get phone calls at the station thanking me for keeping the ads at a decent level.

At the theatre, every ad...every trailer...every tag has its own cue attached to it so if need be the level can be set in the automation to keep it all at a constant level. Trailers are not recorded all the same (anyone playing Black Swan should know by now it's VERY loud). It's never loud at my theatre.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-07-2011 03:56 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Technically, I would assume (hope) everything is recorded and played back at 100% tone but there's more to it than that and human intervention is needed. Unfortunately, seeing as it's all automated now that's not going to happen.

When I was switching shows on-air, I played the programs at 100% and had to pull the ad content down to around 40% to have it 'seem' to play at the same level. The limiter did not take into account the clarity of locally made ads compared to the 16mm print audio quality we just came out of. Even normal shows off tape had differing quality levels that the limiter could not possibly take into account. Also the limiter would 'see' that I'd pulled the level don and try to compensate.

I used to get phone calls at the station thanking me for keeping the ads at a decent level.

At the theatre, every ad...every trailer...every tag has its own cue attached to it so if need be the level can be set in the automation to keep it all at a constant level. Trailers are not recorded all the same (anyone playing Black Swan should know by now it's VERY loud). It's never loud at my theatre.

 |  IP: Logged

Ian Parfrey
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1049
From: Imbil Australia 26 deg 27' 42.66" S 152 deg 42' 23.40" E
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 01-07-2011 05:50 PM      Profile for Ian Parfrey   Email Ian Parfrey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John.

Heard you the first time. [Razz]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-07-2011 06:29 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cool...now they need to apply it to trailers and ads in theatres. They also need to give the RIAA what for and end the LOUD CDs that have ZERO dynamic range.

-Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-07-2011 08:45 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Joe Redifer
there isn't a bunch of fast-talking and cheesy music in the program you were watching
Unless you're watching MTV or "E" or....

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-07-2011 09:47 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
You are right, of course, there is more to it than just signal level. There is the "apparent" loudness that you perceive due to many factors, not the least of which is content such as what Joe points out -- cheesy music. There is always much more dynamic range in program material compared to the super compressed right-at-the-redline commercials, so if you have a commercial that starts with loud, compressed music -- I shall not name a genre, but let's just say the one that no one over 35 even considers music (or, gag me with a spoon, feakin "poetry" as I have heard it called) -- even if it is not over-modulated, it will still sound way hot to humans with ears. That's why humans with ears used to actually sit at audio consoles and ride level.

I would think that if there are not already black boxes out there that can process that apparent loudness issue, no doubt nowadays a computer program can be written that could be taught to understand what a human with ears understands as too loud. If it can't, well then I guess now there is a law that is going to make the broadcasters and cable operators hire such eared humans to help them comply.

I am itching to see how the law is written because it can't just say the commercials can't go over an average db level because then you're right back where we started with highly compressed obnoxious content being perceived as too loud even though it might keep the VU meter at a legal level.

I mean, let's face it -- the last movement of Beethoven's 9th is going to be right up at 0db and it will sound just awesome to us. Follow that by a rap tune (oooh, no, I didn't say that, did I?) and while that might even be 6db LOWER than the symphony, to you and me it would still sound much, MUCH too loud. But then again, I guess there's the blessed MUTE button, or like me, never EVER watch anything in real time so the FAST FORWARD button is always available, or the BEST thing for the wasteland that is TV is that equally laudable OFF switch!

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 01-07-2011 10:42 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Will it govern levels between channels? For example, the local ABC channel on COX(OKC) is significantly louder than the others.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-08-2011 05:07 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The TASA program with LEQ(m) really hit on something. It isn't just the volume level but the volume relative to the length. So...you can have your REALLY LOUD times so long as they are balanced with some quieter times. In a feature film, this isn't a problem...you can have your battle scenes since over the course of a 2-hour movie it balances just fine with the talking scenes. In a trailer...well you only have 2 or 3 minutes so your average level over that time should be something reasonable...otherwise it will come across as TOO loud.

Dolby LEQ(m) meter pdf

The manual above has a pretty decent appendix to better explain the concept.

-Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 01-21-2011 01:10 PM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the whole thing comes down to limited dynamic range, something which would be hard to outlaw. Think about it. Do the commcials sound louder than the music on your average, pop music station? No. Because there's no dynamic range in the music. In order to comply with the law do the broadcasters have to limit the dynamic range of the regular programming?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.