|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Slow Buttery Death
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bill Brandenstein
Master Film Handler
Posts: 413
From: Santa Clarita, CA
Registered: Jul 2013
|
posted 06-30-2016 10:28 PM
Neil, I appreciate the labor of love that you've put into the direction of this documentary, and Chris' labor of love in running the Beacon Theatres. What would improve this would be less about budget and much about purpose/script/editing. I really had a hard time watching the whole thing, and honestly did skip through portions. There are long segments of this that are far too much like home videos (meandering, just not artistic visually, sonically, nor verbally), yet on the other hand there are critical facts and moments that you set up well. So I agree with the others that the length of this should be half or less what it is presently. And the title is definitely misleading now that Beacon has at least one digital screen. I also think (while I'm busy beating you up) that the claim to be the last 35mm theater to open in the US is unfair, since it's a reopening of sorts (although that's abundantly clear later).
Some other non-professional documentaries on the end of film might give you a point of comparison. Check out Dave Humphries' segments of the then-unfinished "Dying of the Light" documentary on Vimeo. The official release trailer can be viewed here. Also, there's a great short about the closing of a cineplex in Oklahoma, but I can't find it at the moment. It's more along the lines of what you're doing here, and fun to watch, so I'll try to find it later when I have access to a different computer.
Sure hope Chris has good Kelmar cleaner here and there and some FilmGuard, because his film handling looked horrendous. I'm not even a 35mm professional and his throwing leader on the floor and over-winding "Hateful 8" made me cringe too!
| IP: Logged
|
|
Frank Angel
Film God
Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-21-2017 12:45 PM
Dear lord, somebody please give this man a lone so he can get a digital projector and keep him away from whatever film is left. Look, I appreciate this "labor of love" thing, but really, as in other areas of life, sometimes lots of bad things are done in the name of love.
No question he is committed and dedicated to making the place work, but film, whatever minuscule number of release prints are still available, simply can't sustain this business. I think he understands that; what has to happen is he needs to give up the romance (some might call it abuse) with 35mm and do everything possible to convert as quickly as possible as it is the only way to save what could be a sweet little theatre operation.
He certainly has his hands full with the physical operation of the business...let him throw himself into that; digital certainly will give him more time for configuring those popcorn boxes.
And as has been said, as far as the video itself, it really does need an editor. Usually the hardest thing for a filmmaker to do is to cut out what he has already recorded. That's why an editor, separate from the director, is so essential. It needs to be seriously tightened and the narrative much more focused.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|