my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Large Format Forum   » Upgrading QTRU for Polar Express

Author Topic: Upgrading QTRU for Polar Express James B. Openshaw Expert Film Handler Posts: 106 From: Mt. Pleasant, SC, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 07-10-2004 07:18 PM                        Hi everyone! I've noticed that the upcoming movie "Polar Express", is going to be around 90-min. and is in 3D. I also heard that IMAX theaters with the Kinton QTRU's are upgrading decks 2 and 3 to the 90 min arms. I just would like to know if anyone has any additional knowledge on that and also if their theater will for sure go ahead with this upgrade?  |  IP: Logged Robert Stawiarski Film Handler Posts: 62 From: MW Registered: Aug 2003 posted 07-10-2004 07:44 PM                    Many of the theatres that will book Polar Express are the ones who also have played DMR product in the past. Most of these theatres also received the 90 minute upgrade for Fantasia 2k, Beauty and the Beast, or Lion King. When upgraded to play DMR, the 90 minute decks were usually moved to 2 and 3, and the 150 minute arms were placed on 4 and 5. Not all, but most are setup this way -- these theatres are ready. The SR systems are a bit different since they are able to use a changeover for the DMR films, and might not have upgraded past the 90 minute arms, so these theatres will need an upgrade on their QTs. We're ready for it, and Polar Express may prove to have the draw (simul. release family DMR movie in 3D) for the more 'traditional' theatres to book it and upgrade their platter systems as needed.  |  IP: Logged Brian Michael Weidemann Expert cat molester Posts: 944 From: Costa Mesa, CA United States Registered: Feb 2004 posted 07-11-2004 04:00 AM                        When we opened our IMAX (part two: The Vengence), the QTRU installed had the upgraded platter decks 4 and 5 to 120's, but 1, 2, and 3 were still limited to 60's, as they still are. For Matrix we had the 150's upgrade on 4 and 5. I am told that we are getting 90's upgrades for 2 and 3 for the Polar Express release, which is the bare minimum if we're to play it at all. Beyond this, I have no other info. Is Polar Express actually DMR? The trailer looks so crisp, with none of the DMR "artifacts" that I've noticed in the Warner Bros. DMR's. So since it's all CG, I imagine it was just re-rendered; no DMR necessary. Any info on that?  |  IP: Logged Mike Olpin Chop Chop! Posts: 1852 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Jan 2002 posted 07-11-2004 04:29 AM                     I don't think it is DMR. Since it is 3D, the must have re-rendered it, and if your going to go to the trouble of re-rendering it, it would make sense to knock up the resolution a bit to take full advantage of the IMAX format.  |  IP: Logged Adam Martin I'm not even gonna point out the irony. Posts: 3686 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 07-11-2004 01:04 PM                     Imax also has the technology to convert existing 2D animation to 3D. That's what was done with CyberWorld. In fact, both DMR and SANDEE (animation) were in development at the same time. CyberWorld got greenlighted because they couldn't get DMR to work (efficiently, if at all) with the technology of the time. The real question is, how high can you push the resolution when re-rendering CGI before it takes too long to re-render and becomes cost-ineffective compared to DMR?  |  IP: Logged Bob Brown Expert Film Handler Posts: 146 From: Grand Rapids, MI Registered: Apr 2002 posted 07-11-2004 01:53 PM                        To answer James question, It was my understanding that all theatres scheduled to show Polar Express have/will be contacted by IMAX to discuss the QTRU conversion. I know that both of our theatres, Grand Rapids and Lansing, are upgrading to 120 min decks. If you need any further information, you should call Chris Appleton, Aftermarket and Major Upgrade Manager at 205.733.569. If your theatre has NOT been contacted and are planning on showing Polar, I would not hesitate in contacting Chris. There is a waiting list for the conversion, which you will need to have your theatre added. I think he said the conversion would be in the $25,000.00 range. Hope this helps [ 07-12-2004, 01:15 AM: Message edited by: Bob Brown ]  |  IP: Logged James B. Openshaw Expert Film Handler Posts: 106 From: Mt. Pleasant, SC, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 07-11-2004 02:16 PM                        We already have 150 min. arms on decks 4 and 5, we also have the leftover 90 min. arms from our previous upgrade. As for contacting IMAX, since I'm not the chief projectionist or a manager, I have no authority to do that. That decision is up to my theatre director. Personally, $25,000 to upgrade two more decks for one full-length 3D film sounds questionable; unless there are plans for more 3D full-length films very soon. Anyone have any information on that aspect?  |  IP: Logged Bob Brown Expert Film Handler Posts: 146 From: Grand Rapids, MI Registered: Apr 2002 posted 07-11-2004 03:00 PM                        James: Our QTRU's have not been upgraded at all. They are planning on upgrading ALL decks. Decks 1,2,3 will be a 90 min and 4,5 will be 150 min. I mis-spoke about the 120 mins upgrade. That is why it is costing so much to do the upgrade. [ 07-12-2004, 12:06 AM: Message edited by: Bob Brown ]  |  IP: Logged Robert Stawiarski Film Handler Posts: 62 From: MW Registered: Aug 2003 posted 07-11-2004 03:04 PM                    James, no other 3D feature length movies in the pipeline that I know of. While unlikely, it would be nice if the Shrek 3D project were picked up again.  |  IP: Logged Mike Olpin Chop Chop! Posts: 1852 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Jan 2002 posted 07-11-2004 04:25 PM                     It's too bad Disney got out of it. "A Bug's Life 3D" would have been breathtakinng!  |  IP: Logged James B. Openshaw Expert Film Handler Posts: 106 From: Mt. Pleasant, SC, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 07-11-2004 08:44 PM                        Mike, Disney & Pixar have a 3D version of "A Bug's Life", but it's a short Disney attraction entitled, "It's Tough To Be A Bug" in Animal Kingdom at WDW. They might copy it to California Adventure (They copied everything else from WDW). From what I know about the transfer of "Polar Express", DMR won't be necessary since the movie is all on a computer, so WB can transfer it themselves and send it to DKP70mm. It was that way with "Attack of the Clones". [ 07-12-2004, 05:53 PM: Message edited by: James B. Openshaw ]  |  IP: Logged Adam Martin I'm not even gonna point out the irony. Posts: 3686 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Nov 2000 posted 07-11-2004 09:31 PM                     Attack of the Clones did indeed get the DMR treatment. And it was released by Fox.  |  IP: Logged Mike Olpin Chop Chop! Posts: 1852 From: Dallas, TX Registered: Jan 2002 posted 07-11-2004 10:07 PM                     Of course. I've seen It's Tough to be a Bug at California Adventure. I especially liked the animatronic hoper that bursts out of the wall. I was refering to watching the actual feature in IMAX 3D. Disney has been doing a lot of copying between their parks. You guys are in for a treat when "Soarin' " opens in WDW. Thats a top-notch attraction!  |  IP: Logged Brian Michael Weidemann Expert cat molester Posts: 944 From: Costa Mesa, CA United States Registered: Feb 2004 posted 07-11-2004 11:35 PM                        quote: Adam Martin Attack of the Clones did indeed get the DMR treatment. Which leads me to believe that there's no reason NOT to release Episode III with DMR, giving us IMAX folks a fine Summer '05 season of business.  |  IP: Logged Dick Vaughan Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1032 From: Bradford, West Yorkshire, UK Registered: Jul 2000 posted 07-12-2004 02:22 AM                        quote: Brian Michael Weidemann Which leads me to believe that there's no reason NOT to release Episode III with DMR, giving us IMAX folks a fine Summer '05 season of business. And if this time round Fox looked beyond North America we would all be happy  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.