|
|
Author
|
Topic: Happy Feet to be in 2D
|
Jason Setzer
Film Handler
Posts: 46
From: Tampa, Florida
Registered: Aug 2006
|
posted 09-24-2006 12:43 PM
Well for anyone who thought they were going to have a great Christmas holiday in IMAX due to Happy Feet needs to revert to plan B.
The really crappy part is that we had a happy feet 3d trailer in front of Ant Bully and Deep Sea 3d.I cannot imagine the hell we are going to go through with customers driving all the way to our theatre and realizing that the movie isn't in 3D.
Also don't forget the thousands of dollars each theatre is going to lose because of this.
Quoting movie web http://www.movieweb.com/news/81/14481.php
Warner Bros. and IMAX are unable to get the Happy Feet IMAX 3D print ready in time for the November 17 release date.
The movie will be released in both conventional and IMAX theatres. A simultaneous release is more important to the two companies who have agreed to release the film in IMAX 2D so it can be ready by November 17.
IMAX Co-Chairmen and Co-CEOs Richard L. Gelfond said "Unfortunately, to release it (concurrently in Imax and conventional theaters) it had to be in 2D, and we're exploring a subsequent release in 3D ... We remain really excited about this movie."
A spokeswoman for Warner Bros. said time constraints didn't allow for a simultaneous release of the film in 2D and 3D, but noted that a 3D release of the film, about a tap-dancing penguin, was still in the cards at some point.
The animated film features the voices of Elijah Wood, Robin Williams, Brittany Murphy, Hugh Jackman, Nicole Kidman, Hugo Weaving, Anthony LaPaglia, Magda Szubanski, Miriam Mirgoyles. [ 09-24-2006, 03:51 PM: Message edited by: Adam Martin ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark J. Marshall
Film God
Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted 09-26-2006 10:45 AM
Woah, what the hell does that mean?? No more IMAX film either? What will IMAX mean if they're showing stuff digitally? How will the IMAX-converted-to-digital-auditorium differ from the 35mm-converted-to-digital-auditorium next to it? Please tell me that I'm misunderstanding what's going on here.
By the way, ditto 110% to what Bobby said. Shoot it in 3D, or don't show it in 3D. To make the 2D movie look convincing in 3D takes much more work than just shooting it that way to begin with. Why make things harder on yourselves, Hollywood?
I still say get James Cameron to do the last Harry Potter movie.
Back on topic, that's a bummer about Happy Feet. It looks like it'll be a fun movie, and I was looking forward to seeing it in 3D. Oh, well. I'll still watch it in 2D, and I'm still looking forward to it.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|