Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » "Cheap" 2nd screen 3D (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: "Cheap" 2nd screen 3D
Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-19-2009 06:16 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Effective only through July 15th, XpanD will offer the second 3D system in each participating complex at half-price based on prices in effect preceding this announcement. With nearly 800 installations globally, XpanD utilizes active 3D glasses, which are sold separately. XpanD recently launched their newest model, the X101 Series, which it believes offers the most superior stereoscopic viewing in the market, along with an array of special features, including replacement batteries and security tags. The ecology-minded reusable glasses have a sleek and durable design that movie patrons are sure to favor.

If I understood right, the deal is as follows: You have a 3D screen in your complex, no matter what system (i.e. Dolby or RealD or Master Image or XpanD), and you qualify for setting up a second screen to 3D with XpanD at half the price.

XpanD system, very popular outside the USA, doesn't require any special screens like Dolby (but they all benefit from high gain screens, as the glasses cut off a lot of light). Similar to Dolby, the glasses are very expensive and thus require collection and cleaning for re-use. Also, XpanD glasses need occasional inexpensive batteries replacement.

The system can easily move around auditoriums as it works with any screen and not only silver and all it's needed is to plug an interface box into the projector and place a little tranmitter next to the booth projection window.

Main dissadvantage is the cost of glasses and thus the risk of lost/damage, etc. It compares fine with other systems in brightness, etc. It perhaps "flickers" more than others, but not really an issue much more than it is in other systems. Ghosting performance is comparable (Dolby and Imax is better, though).

 |  IP: Logged

Tristan Lane
Master Film Handler

Posts: 444
From: Nampa, Idaho
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 05-19-2009 06:26 PM      Profile for Tristan Lane   Email Tristan Lane   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Julio Roberto
XpanD system, very popular outside the USA, doesn't require any special screens like Dolby
Julio, I believe you made a boo-boo in your above statement.

Interesting that XpanD would be offering this, but I doubt there will be many takers in the US. Many exhibitors bank on brand recognition to their customers. RealD and of course the Dolby name are well-known, but over here in the states XpanD is still not as established.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-19-2009 06:47 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Julio Roberto
Main dissadvantage is the cost of glasses and thus the risk of lost/damage, etc.
Thats exactly why Marcus Theaters in Wisconsin pulled the Expand systems out of their theaters. The glasses didn't hold up well to repeated washings. I saw theor demo at Showorst several years ago and it looked ok to me. I don't think it was a demo using the electronic glasses however...

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-19-2009 06:52 PM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, according to their statement

quote:
With nearly 800 installations globally,
In the USA there are about 1200 3-D installations combining RealD/Dolby/XpanD/MasterImage. At least that's the number quoted in the last conference about 3D I attended last month. Perhaps 1400(+Imax) or so by now.

So I'd say if it is true, and I have no strong reason to believe otherwise, I'd say XpanD is a fairly popular 3D system outside the USA.

It certainly has a much larger market share than Master Image [Wink]

EDIT: Seems the count for all 3D equipped screens in the USA, including Imax, is 2,080 currently. As we know, there was a huge rush for the Monsters Vs Aliens movie recently. Still, recent 3D movies like Disney's Jonas Bros only opened in 1276 screens and Battle for Terra in 1159 (including 2D engagements).

PS: In Spain (population 46 million) there are about 90 3-D Dcinemas, including 4 Imax, out of about 4200 cinema screens total. At least 23 are XpanD, about 20 Dolby, and the rest mostly RealD.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-19-2009 07:35 PM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mark Gulbrandsen
I don't think it was a demo using the electronic glasses however...

It was a snippet from the CGI film "Fly me to the Moon" and we used the cardboard polarized (linear) glasses since it was a two-eye digital system.

I thought that XpanD was the "thrill-o-vision" type of arrangement with the "action" seats that throws you around when the action sequences were in play.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Olpin
Chop Chop!

Posts: 1852
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 05-19-2009 08:34 PM      Profile for Mike Olpin   Email Mike Olpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
That's what I got out of the demo too. They had motion seats and a few other 4D type gimmicks, but the glasses were cardboard.

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-20-2009 06:54 AM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For what it's worth, and in case it helps anyone with how popular some equipment is in the global marketplace, here is a fairly complete and recent list of 3D screens in Spain. Out of the ~4200 in the whole country, less than 90 are digital 3D. Just a couple of months ago, they were only 40. It lists the city, name of the complex, screen, price of 3D show admission and projector/server/3D system when known.

A Coruña Filmax A Coruña ??€ 2K: Christie DOREMI XpanD
Alicante Cinesa Panoramis 3D (sala 7) 9,90€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Benidorm IMF Finestrat (sala 2) 6,50€ 2K Dolby 3D
Elche ABC Elx (sala 1) 8,60€ 2K Dolby 3D
San Juan de Alicante Cines AANA (sala 1) 9,00€ 2K Dolby 3D?
San Juan de Alicante Cines AANA (sala 5) 9,00€ 2K Dolby 3D?
Oviedo Yelmo Cineplex Los Prados (sala IMAX) 9,70€ IMAX MPX IMAX 3D
Oviedo Yelmo Cineplex Los Prados (sala 9) 9,70€ 2K Christie DC2000 DOREMI XpanD
Oviedo Cinesa Parque Principado 3D (sala 3) 9,90€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Mérida Cinesa El Foro 3D (sala 5) 8,70€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Badalona Megacine (sala 8) 9,50€ 2K ??
Barcelona IMAX Port Vell 12,10€ 70mm/15perf IMAX 3D
Barcelona Cinesa Diagonal Mar 3D (sala 10) 10,10€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Barcelona Cinesa La Maquinista 3D (sala 12) 10,10€ 2K RealD
Barcelona Cinesa La Maquinista 3D (sala 13) 10,10€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Barcelona Cinesa Herón City 3D BCN (sala 15) 11,20€ 2K RealD
Barcelona Aribau Club (sala 1) 9,00€ 2K Dolby 3D
Barcelona Gran Sarrià (sala 5)*208 10,00€ 2K Dolby 3D
Barcelona Cinesa Diagonal 3D (sala 2) 10,80€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Barcelona Cinesa Diagonal 3D (sala 3) 10,80€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Castelldefels Filmax Castelldefels (sala 5) 10,00€ 2K: Christie DOREMI XpanD
Cerdanyola del Vallés El Punt del Vallès (sala 3) 9,00€ 2K XpanD
Cornellá Multicines Llobregat (sala 9) 8,80€ 2K RealD??
Gavá Cinesa Barnasud 3D (sala 7) 9,00€ 2K RealD??
Granollers Ocine Granollers - El Nord (sala 3) 9,50€ 2K XpanD
L'Hospitalet Filmax Granvía (sala 1) 10,00€ 2K: Christie DOREMI XpanD
Mataró Cinesa Mataró 3D (sala 9) 10,10€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Sabadell Cines Imperial (sala 3) 8,70€ 2K NEC NC1600C Doremi XpanD
Sabadell Cines Imperial (sala 4) 8,70€ 2K NEC NC1600C Doremi XpanD
Sabadell Eix Macià (sala 4) 8,70€ 2K NEC NC1600C Doremi XpanD
Terrassa Cinesa Parc Vallès 3D (sala 21) 9,40€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Barcelona Vic Sucre (sala 3) 7,40€ 2K Cinemeccanica XpanD
Barakaldo Yelmo Cineplex Megapark 8,10€ IMAX MPX IMAX 3D
Durango Cine Zugaza 6,00€ 2K Dolby 3D
Leioa Cinesa Artea 3D (sala 3) 9,60€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Portugalete Cines Ballonti (sala 2) 7,80€ 2K XpanD 6D butacas móviles, efectos sala, olor
Jerez de la Frontera Yelmo Cines Area Sur (sala 11) 9,30€ 2K Christie CP2000 DOREMI XpanD
Santander Cinesa Bahía de Santander 3D (sala 9) 9,60€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Ciudad Real Multicines Las Vías (sala 12) 5,50€ 2K ??
Córdoba Cinesur El Tablero (sala 10) 7,50€ 2K: NEC NC1600C DOREMI XpanD
Girona Ocine Girona (sala 11) 8,80€ 2K XpanD
Granada Kinépolis Granada (sala 9) 7,20€ 2K Dolby 3D
Granada Kinépolis Granada (sala 10) 7,20€ 2K Dolby 3D
Granada Kinépolis Granada (sala 15) 7,20€ 2K Dolby 3D
Granada Cinema Andalucía 2000 (sala 4) 7,50€ 2K Dolby 3D
Lepe Cineápolis Lepe (sala 4) 5,60€ 2K Dolby 3D
Inca (Mallorca) Cinesa Festival Park 3D (sala 12) 9,00€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Jaén Linares Cines Bowling (sala 3) 6,50€ 2K Dolby 3D
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Cinesa Siete Palmas 3D (sala 4) 9,90€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Las Palmas Las Palmas de Gran Canaria Cinesa El Muelle 3D ??€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Lleida Alpicat JCA Cinemes Aplicat (sala 14) 6,50€ 2K ??
Alcorcón Yelmo Cines Tresaguas (sala 11) 9,00€ 2K Christie CP2000 DOREMI XpanD
Carabanchel Yelmo Cines Islazul (sala 4) 8,80€ 2K Christie CP2000 DOREMI XpanD
Collado Villalba Yelmo Cines Planetocio (sala 3) 10,40€ 2K Christie CP2000 DOREMI XpanD
La Moraleja Cinesa La Moraleja 3D (sala 5) 10,50€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Las Rozas Cinesa Las Rozas 3D (sala 23) 10,50€ 2K RealD
Las Rozas Cinesa Las Rozas 3D (sala 14) 10,50€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Leganés Cinesa Parquesur 3D (sala 9) 10,40€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Madrid Cinesa Proyecciones 3D (sala 3) 10,50€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Madrid Cinesa Príncipe Pío 3D (sala 9) 10,50€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Madrid Cinesa Loranca 3D (sala 10) 10,40€ 2K RealD
Madrid Cinesa Xanadú 3D (sala 3) 10,40€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Madrid Cinesa Las Rosas 3D (sala 2) 10,30€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Madrid IMAX Madrid 11,10€ 70mm/15perf IMAX 3D
Madrid Yelmo Cines Plenilunio (sala 4) 10,40€ 2K Christie CP2000 DOREMI XpanD
Majadahonda Cinesa Equinoccio 3D (sala 6) 10,50€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Pozuelo Kinépolis (sala 1) 8,85€ 2K Dolby 3D
Pozuelo Kinépolis (sala 12) 8,85€ 2K Dolby 3D
Pozuelo Kinépolis (sala 13) 8,85€ 2K Dolby 3D
Pozuelo Kinépolis (sala 24) 8,85€ 2K Dolby 3D
Rivas-vaciamadrid Yelmo Cines Rivas Futura (sala 13) 10,40€ 2K Christie CP2000 DOREMI XpanD
Vallecas Cinesa Vallecas 3D ??€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Málaga Yelmo Cines Plaza Mayor 9,60€ IMAX MPX IMAX 3D
Málaga Yelmo Cines Plaza Mayor (sala 9) 9,60€ 2K Cinemeccanica DOREMI XpanD
Málaga Yelmo Cines Vialia (sala 9) 7,90€ 2K Cinemaccanica DOREMI XpanD
Marbella Cinesa La Cañada 3D (sala 3) 9,70€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Cartagena Neocine Espacio Mediterráneo (sala 1) 7,50€ 2K XpanD
Lorca ACEC Almenara (sala 8) 8,30€ 2K ??
Murcia Neocine Thader (sala 12) 8,30€ 2K XpanD 6D butacas móviles, efectos sala, olor
Murcia Cinesa Nueva Condomina 3D (sala 8) 8,80€ 2K RealD
Sevilla Cinesur Nervión Plaza (sala 3) 9,00€ 2K Barco DP90 DOREMI XpanD
Tarragona Ocine Les Gavarres (sala 14) 8,80€ 2K XpanD
Alcira El punt de la ribera (sala 8) 8,20€ 2K Nuvision
Aldaia Cinesa Bonaire 3D (sala 8) 10,10€ 2K NEC Qube RealD
Gandía ABC Gandía (sala 8) 8,60€ 2K ??
Paterna Kinépolis (sala 13) 7,80€ 2K Dolby 3D
Paterna Kinépolis (sala 14) 7,80€ 2K Dolby 3D
Paterna Kinépolis (sala 15) 7,80€ 2K Dolby 3D
Sagunto Alucine Sagunto (sala 5) 6,00€ 2K ??
Valencia Ocine Valencia - Aqua (sala 4) 9,00€ 2K XpanD
Valencia ABC El Saler (sala 7) 8,90€ 2K ??
Zamora Multicines Zamora (sala 3) 6,50€ 2K Christie CP-2000ZX RealD
Zamora Multicines Zamora (sala 4) 6,50€ 2K Christie CP-2000ZX RealD
Zamora Valderaduey (sala 1) 5,50€ 2K Christie CP-2000SB DOREMI XpanD
Zamora Valderaduey (sala 2) 5,50€ 2K Christie CP-2000SB DOREMI XpanD
Zamora Valderaduey (sala 3) 5,50€ 2K Christie CP-2000SB DOREMI XpanD
Zamora Valderaduey (sala 4) 5,50€ 2K Christie CP-2000SB DOREMI XpanD
Zaragoza Cinesa Augusta 3D (sala 4) 9,10€ 2K RealD
Zaragoza Cinesa Grancasa 3D (sala 4) 9,10€ 2K RealD
Zaragoza Cinesa Grancasa 3D (sala 6) 9,10€ 2K RealD
Zaragoza Yelmo Cines Plaza Imperial (sala 8) 9,10€ 2K Christie CP2000 DOREMI XpanD
Zaragoza Palafox Las Salas (sala 3) 9,00€ 2K XpanD
Zaragoza Zaragoza Palafox Aragonia ??€ 2K XpanD

As you can see, NEC and Christie are more popular around here than Barcos. Doremi and Qube the preferred servers by installer. And RealD and XpanD the preferred 3D options. Prices for 3D shows range from around 6€ to around 9€ on the average.

 |  IP: Logged

James B Gardiner
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: North Altona, Victoria, Ausrtalia
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 05-24-2009 08:44 AM      Profile for James B Gardiner   Email James B Gardiner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Xpand is expensive and the glasses are not great.. BUT, it gets you into 3D cheap and easy. Can drop it onto nearly ANY standard DCI screen as is. No new screen or extra kit for projector.
So.. its popular for one main reason.

You want to compete with the 3D cinema down the Road. Get this. Recommend you only have a small 3D cinema (Keeps glasses down and excess costs under control) but at the same time, gets the punters coming to YOUR cinema looking for the 3D show, but ending up seeing something else.

At least you have the patrons at YOUR cinema.

RealD is the only choice for high seating cinemas. You cannot go past the disposable glasses when you have that type of turn over.

But in a small cinema, Xpand comes into its own.

The right 3D kit for the right cinema. Each have their advantages.
Unfortunately, Dolby 3D has no real plus apart from the Name. And Dolby is being pushed out of cinema in many ways.

MasterImage, is just not implemented well and is the lowest of all % of light on screen.

RealD for big and Xpand for small. General rule of thumb but everything effects this and exceptions exist.

 |  IP: Logged

Brendan Penny
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 121
From: Bundoora, Australia
Registered: Dec 2008


 - posted 05-24-2009 09:34 PM      Profile for Brendan Penny   Email Brendan Penny   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: James B Gardiner
MasterImage, is just not implemented well and is the lowest of all % of light on screen.
You serious? MI systems are so light efficient they can almost compete with RealD XL.

I think Xpand have the worst light output of any system. So bad that I walked out of their "Battle For Terra" screening at Showest this year with an enormous headache. Their 'new' glasses were really bulky and uncomfortable btw...

I have only seen Dolby 3D once a while back but from memory it was better than Xpand and would be my choice for smaller screen 'active' applications. Then again, as a small cinema operator it is hard to justify the house keeping costs of re-usable glasses, period.

Could just be me but would be interested to hear other peoples thoughts on Xpand. I really thought it sucked but am open to convincing me otherwise....

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-24-2009 09:53 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: James B Gardiner
RealD is the only choice for high seating cinemas.
Why on earth would you post that sort of statement? It is very definately NOT the best choice for large seating areas! Two things preclude that.

1. The need for a silver screen and the resulatant 3-D loss in certain areas of the room, "lost seats". Front rows and the corners of the rooms suffer the most. Yes, this happens even with a properly curved screen!

2. The light doubler is limited on screen width and can only work properly under very certain conditions. So it's use is precluded in the majority of installtions.

quote: James B Gardiner
MasterImage, is just not implemented well and is the lowest of all % of light on screen.

Errrr, Wrong again. It's actually the most transmissive of the lot. It also has extremely high quality CP filters and the glasses even in small quantities are not expensive. It can be moved around within a "Plex" within 10 min too! The implementation of it is going very well here in the States. Installation... including uncrating it... takes less then 2 hours start to finish. I can't speak of how it's implementation is going "down under"...

quote: James B Gardiner
Unfortunately, Dolby 3D has no real plus apart from the Name. And Dolby is being pushed out of cinema in many ways.

Errrr, Wrong again! Dolby has sold a boat load of 3-D systems in the last couple of months. With the advent of full frame triple flash DLP Dolby has come into it's own and is extremely advantageous over all of the other systems. There isn't a single "Lost Seat" in any of the installations I've done and the glasses have the lowest cost per cycle of all the glasses out there.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

James B Gardiner
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: North Altona, Victoria, Ausrtalia
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 05-25-2009 07:58 AM      Profile for James B Gardiner   Email James B Gardiner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No according to Data I have seen from 2 different sources.

% on screen goes like this.
From memory:
RealD XL 27% (From RealD, but sounds a little on the high side to me..)
Xpand 17%
RealD Z-screen 14%
MasterImage 12%
Dolby is some place down here. I even heard 8-9%

My technical investigation on Masterimage also indicates it has a very bad DARK time due to the number of segments. (More is bad. Why the Dolby spinning wheel is 2 seg, Master Image is 8 or 16 I forget which.) More segments = more dark time = less light on screen. So, I tend to believe these specs.
Less segments means spin faster. 2 seq spins so fast it NEEDS to be in the projector for safety reasons.

MasterImage also have the worst placement for maximum ON time because the segment passes across the screen NOT from top to bottom but side to side. (Top to bottom taking less time as its less distance. Ie like Dolby colour wheel.)

So. I don;t know where you get your data from but i strongly disagree.

The only real info I do not have clear data on is the difference in performance of polarizing filters based on static ones and LCD. But I don;t expect them to be too different.

In terms of Dolby, a few cinema here did purchase this system. It costs a ridiculous amount (Due to having to get the biggest/most expensive projector you can purchase) and the glasses keep walking out the door. They regret it..
In a large seating cinema it is too hard to control the glasses. 500 or more people leaving in 5 mins. no way in hell you can keep them from walking out with them if they really wanted to. It kills you. Smaller cinemas this is much easier to control so having reusable expensive glasses is not so bad. (But still an issue)

These issues will float to the top and Dolby 3D will be on the back foot. You can tell this already by the fact they announced duel projectors as a qualified solution after XL started to take hold.

Dolby may look very good, but it just has too many negatives, and at the end of the day, all the 3D systems work well enough to fill your cinemas. So why adopt these issues?
Worst light on screen, expensive, cannot be moved, reusable glasses that commonly walk out the door. etc. Cost per cycle is not the issue. Not when they disappear before they make the cost back.

I simply cannot recommend this to a exhibitor.

Also the screen issue. Please, you have to purchase a new screen for any 3D system (Apart from Xpand usually) so what does it matter. Silver screen or hi-gain screen. Its a non issue.

In terms of Xpand. By no means is Xpand perfect, but its easy to install (15min) and works on many general DCI screens without the need for new screen etc. So you can get an Xpand system and your 3D. You can mov it from screen to screen as the show needs to. It has a lot of versatility and makes you a 3D multiplex in a snap. This is why it is selling well, probably many more screen over all, but probably less seats then dolby.

I would like to point out, I put business model before technical quality here. If your not a profitable cinema, soon you will be showing nothing.

James

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-25-2009 09:02 AM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
James,

The master image system doesn't need a whole revolution per frame. It's not like in a color wheel where all segments may be needed for a complete image and thus the number of segments may indeed indicate longer blanking intervals per frame.

Master Image claims to do the whole 144 flashes rotating its filter. They say at an efective rate of 4230 rpm, but with the wheel being multisegment, this can't be correct.

Thus they switch at exactly the same rate as RealD or Dolby. 144 times a second the filter needs to go from "right circular" (72 times) to "left circular" (72 times). They both need 144 blanking intervals during the transsition periods.

The blanking interval may indeed be slightly longer (but no more frequent, like I think you were implying) than the switch time on RealD's z-screen, but not by much (i.e. I suspect it will be around 7% on RealD and about 10% on MI).

Having multiple segments on the MI wheel may simply help them obtain the same frequency with a lower RPM in their motors, thus improving the noise/safety/wear/other concerns. One revolution on Dolby (2 filters) may only need 1/8 revolution on Master Images (i.e. 16 filters). But they both make 2 blanking intervals during that time period (2 segments on a whole turn with Dolby, also 2 segments with a slower 1/8 turn of Master Image).

Coupled with their improved transmitance filters over the z-screen, I would guess from available data they are not that different in transmission (brightness). It would have to be measured to figure out wich one has the (probably) slight edge.

But like all polarization systems, they are angle-dependant (even circular) and thus start to suffer serious ghosting problems on the edge of the screens that worsen the larger the screen is, specially for those sitting on the sides. Dolby doesn't have that problem, nor does XpanD. But all polarizing systems (Imax/Dual/RealD/Master Image/Sony) do have it. Only really a concern for seriously wide screens on wide auditoriums.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-25-2009 09:15 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: James B Gardiner
So. I don;t know where you get your data from but i strongly disagree.

From my light meter my friend. I suggest that you install one of the Master Image systems before you post such nonsense. The wheel does rotate at 4320 rpm. I've been able to utilize the smallest lamps of all the systems I've installed with this system and they were all on non-full frame triple flash systems. I will post a photo of the wheel later today.

As for Dolby and what takes place "down under" is no clue as to what the rest of the world is doing. How many glasses walk out is the operations fault... not Dolby's. The glasses in fact have an alarm trigger in each pair so if they are using the peoper pole alarms at these cinemas then they wouldn't be loosing any. Dolby still stands as the least expensive system to install and utilize... one just has to know what they are doing. Dolby 3-D still stands as the cheapest of all the systems to implement if one looks at the cost over the lifespan of the glasses... certainly any smart buisness man does that.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

James B Gardiner
Film Handler

Posts: 91
From: North Altona, Victoria, Ausrtalia
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 05-25-2009 09:29 AM      Profile for James B Gardiner   Email James B Gardiner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MasterImage with 16 segments is 8x slower then the Dolby wheel, meaning 8x the possible blanking time compared to Dolby.
The slower the transition really drops the light.

This ending in a 2-4% difference.. maybe, but I would expect much more.

The MasterImage system is a good idea and I expect may become popular, its just the current MasterImage implementation is wanting and could be improved greatly.

In real terms, this is not that hard. A smart motor syncing to the projector GPIO running a wheel, is all it really is.

I am surprised there are not a lot of home grown system poping up all over the world.

James

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-25-2009 09:38 AM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While I generally agree with you, Mark, there are markets and situations where the cost of Dolby's glasses offsets the advantages.

Like James mentioned, even if you use security scanners for stolen Dolby glasses, if you have a 600 seats auditorium exiting in 7 minutes flat through 3 doors, it wouldn't be practical to control the theft of glasses.

A different thing would be if Dolby glasses were (say) $10 each. Then the loss of a few may be easily offset by the savings of reusing them, and equipping a theater with a few thousand glasses, scanners for all exit doors, cleaning equipment and personnel wouldn't be such a cost issue.

But at $27/pair over $8 tickets, there are a lot of markets that won't touch them. Same goes for XpanD, though people are a bit less inclined to steal XpanD's for a number of reasons.

Like James says, for a smaller screen they may make more sense, as fewer of them are needed in stock, probably only 1 door needs to be controlled, the rate of loss would probably be small, and for a small number of seats the cleaning/handling operation may be very practical indeed, making Dolby (or even XpanD) the potential long-term cost champion.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.