my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Christie CDXL 30SD xenon life (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Christie CDXL 30SD xenon life David Stone Film Handler Posts: 75 From: Hornsby, Sydney, Australia Registered: Jun 2008 posted 01-20-2010 02:57 AM                     Hi Everyone, I am getting mixed and muddy messages from the supplier in Australia about the warranty hours and life expectancy of the Christie Xenon, What are your experiences, Regards, David. [ 01-20-2010, 10:06 AM: Message edited by: Mike Olpin ]  |  IP: Logged Brendan Penny Expert Film Handler Posts: 121 From: Bundoora, Australia Registered: Dec 2008 posted 01-20-2010 03:07 AM                     Ahhh you are referring to the million dollar lamp!! Glad you asked and I am amazed so many exhibitors jumped in on the ZX bandwagon without considering the lamp running cost. You are looking at 300 hours full warranty/750 pro rata. That's right sports fans, that equates to $2.68 per hour to run these baby's compared to say a Barco using a standard 3kw lamp costing $0.62 per hour. But I guess if Edge Digital says its good why would one ever bother doing their own homework right??? Edge know this. They don't want you to know this. These arn't the droids your looking for...  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-20-2010 06:18 AM                     In the USA, it is 100% warranty to 1000-hours for the CDXL-30SD. The regular CDXL-30 is 100% warranty to 1500 hours. Again, I know these hours for the USA...I don't know how warranty is handled in other parts of the planet. Also, in other parts of the world, Ushio versions of the lamps are available too. They have a DXL prefix rather than UXL, Ushio's norm. Steve  |  IP: Logged Brendan Penny Expert Film Handler Posts: 121 From: Bundoora, Australia Registered: Dec 2008 posted 01-21-2010 07:11 PM                     Sorry apparently I was off on the warranty hours in Australia. The lamp is warranted for 1000hrs 100%. So based on the last price I saw for an SD lamp in June 09. That's $2412+tax / 1000hrs. $2.41 per hour. That's will put a massive 0.27c back in your pocket per hour from my original calculation. (Also the lamp may have come down in price over the last six months.) Important to note that there are other CDXL lamps available that are more cost effective but..... If the spec originally called for an SD lamp in order to meet DCI lume spec than I suspect these other lamps are really not going to help your cause. Would stand to reason if you need an SD lamp today then you are going to need it tomorrow??  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 01-21-2010 08:52 PM                     Brendan, the ZX will output more light than a Barco when using standard lamps. When you add the CDXL30SD lamp, you get more light. My personal belief is that if an auditorium can not be properly lit at the END of the bulb's useful life using normal bulbs, then you should be sizing up to the next projector. Running the more expensive bulbs doesn't make sense if you have to push them hard to achieve light level. Get a CXL-40 and an SB/XB instead and burn it low. In the end, you save money and can easily add 3D later if you desire.  |  IP: Logged Brendan Penny Expert Film Handler Posts: 121 From: Bundoora, Australia Registered: Dec 2008 posted 01-24-2010 07:46 PM                     Yes I agree and that's exactly why I don't understand the economics of the SD lamp. It would be cheaper just to run a standard CDXL40 rather than the SD for a period of time.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-24-2010 09:36 PM                     However...a Barco DP2000 will output more light running a DXL-40BAF than a CP2000ZX running a CDXL-30SD...and the DXL-40BAF is significantly cheaper than the CDXL-30SD...both are made by Ushio too. Steve  |  IP: Logged John T. Hendrickson, Jr Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 889 From: Freehold, NJ, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 01-25-2010 08:48 AM                     Brendan- You say it would be cheaper to run a CDXL40 rather than the SD, but the CP2000ZX specs only accommodate a 3K bulb. How would you be able to do that? Reason I ask is that I think we were underspeced on our install with a CP2000ZX. I have not been happy with the light and we were given a CDXL30 to run on a screen that is 37 ft. wide. According to the Christie website, the CDXL30 calls for screens up to 35 ft.  |  IP: Logged Brendan Penny Expert Film Handler Posts: 121 From: Bundoora, Australia Registered: Dec 2008 posted 01-25-2010 06:15 PM                     Well the simple answer is you can't! As Brad said, one should factor in a CP2000SB rather than a ZX in auditoriums that are 'borderline'. Spec a larger projector is key.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-29-2010 06:57 PM                     The other consideration is that you shold be puling the lamps right at the last hour of valid warranty. If the lamp pops you'll loose a 5 to 7 thousand dollar mirror and heat filter. A few extra hours out of a lamp is not worth getting stuck with that sort of repair bill!!! One thing that most people do not understand about the differences between the CDXL-30 vs. the 30SD is that the 30SD is made to operate at 100% of it's rated current for it's warranted life span. The CDXL-30 has to be started out at a lower amperage like you'd be doing on a film projector and let the lite loc keep it constat as the lamp ages... up to it's maximum current rating. I have found overall that the ZX is not nearly as good a deal as is the NEC-1600 is. The 1600 will take up to a 4kw lamp instead of the Christie's 3kw ability. I believe the equivelent Barco does the same... but I trust NEC/Strong more in the long haul that I do BARCO. Granted the 1600 is a .98" projector but it's also inherently more efficient and costs less than the 1.2" ZX anyway. Mark  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 01-30-2010 12:49 AM                     I like my NEC 1600's .. pretty decent operating unit, good picture, along with doing a bulb change is a snap to do in these units..but you do want to do the bulb change prior when warranty expires though. One has to retune their thinking to spending the dough for bulbs than on soaking all of the hours you can out of a bulb when doing digital. -Monte  |  IP: Logged Brendan Penny Expert Film Handler Posts: 121 From: Bundoora, Australia Registered: Dec 2008 posted 01-30-2010 07:15 PM                     quote: Mark Gulbrandsen but I trust NEC/Strong more in the long haul That's kind of an oxymoron considering both 'NEC' and 'Strong' don't manufacture digital cinema projectors! You need to be trusting 'Digital Projection' don't you??  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 01-31-2010 08:51 AM                     HA...? NEC does indeed manufacture DLP D-Cinema projectors. The NEC 1600 and 2500 are quite popular. NEC bought out DLP Inc's Digital Cinema T.I. license a number of years back because DLP could not afford the venture. Strong manufactures the bases for both projectors. The 1600 is the best bang for the buck here in the USA IMHO. Note. that if you prefer there is a division of NEC called NEC Direct... you don't have to buy them through Strong... but it'll be delivered through them. Doesn't matter to me where they come from... I've concluded that Christie is way way too slow at fixing software bugs... NEC Digital Cinema  |  IP: Logged Brendan Penny Expert Film Handler Posts: 121 From: Bundoora, Australia Registered: Dec 2008 posted 01-31-2010 06:49 PM                     Sorry Mark, I am confusing you with my crazy conspiracy theory!!! I'll raise your 500 and call! DP nec800 And yes, this is all speculation and I am the first to admit that I am talking !!!But there is something about that side panel design...  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-31-2010 07:42 PM                     Is the NC800C even made anymore? Probably not as it is definitely not series 2, isn't HDCP compliant...etc. The NC800C was also under another name IS8 or something like that. Just because a model or two may be shared amongst parties does not mean they are the same throughout. Christie has used Sanyo projectors but certainly not all of their projectors are Sanyo. Most DPs do not look like the NECs. Steve  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.