my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » MasterImage and Ghostbusting

Author Topic: MasterImage and Ghostbusting Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 09-20-2010 05:21 PM                     I'll just bring this issue over from a german forum: Since a few months now, dedicated 'prefabricated' ghostbusted DCPs have become obsolete, being replaced by realtime ghostbusting performed in the server ('RealD EQ'). The servers received software updates which enabled this functionality. Now, there is another system that needs ghostbusting - MasterImage. Although their website claims they don't need ghostbusting, they use the same low separation circular polarizing technology as RealD and I'm sure it is prone to the same amount of ghosting. Unless there is a fundamental separation efficiency difference between the ZScreen and the rotating MasterImage Wheel. Now, 'GhostBusting' is patented by RealD. In the past, it seems to have been common practice to supply ghostbusted copies to anyone who required them - thus MasterImage screens received GB DCPs, although they were mastered under a RealD patent. Today, realtime ghostbusting is done in realtime on the server, but only if you have a RealD license key installed. That means for MasterImage installations - no GB DCPs, no realtime ghostbusting. Any comments? - Carsten  |  IP: Logged John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-20-2010 05:36 PM                     I was told Master Image does not require Ghostbusting.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 09-20-2010 05:55 PM                     That's what they say. Probably because they don't have a patent for it. I assume this is the strategy they are going to communicate. We'll see wether MasterImage installations will suffer from ghosting artifacts more often now that no GB DCPs are available anymore. The separation efficiency of MasterImage is said to be the same as RealD. I'm wondering wether Technicolor uses ghostbusting technology in the mastering process for TC3D. Maybe RealDs patent doesn't apply for film? - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-20-2010 08:33 PM                     Having worked with both MasterImage and Real-D...MasterImage does NOT need ghostbusting...it is a vastly superior 3D to Real-D...which even with ghostbusting...ghosts. They patented a fix to the problem they created with the Z-screen. Furthermore, MasterImage is more efficient than Real-D (standard Z-screen). Steve  |  IP: Logged Dave Macaulay Film God Posts: 2321 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Apr 2001 posted 09-24-2010 12:41 AM                     My interpretation of ghostbusting is that it blanks the image during the time a Z-Screen is electrically switching polarization. The MasterImage wheel has no such switching time, alternating polarity filters are on the rotor in front of the lens and its spin rate is synchronized to the L/R image stream. There may be a period when both filters are in the light path (I haven't examined a filter wheel) and some ghosting will occur but this doesn't seem to be an issue when viewing MasterImage 3D. Dolby 3D would have the same issue, their filter wheels are not polarizing but they alternate "opposite" filters synchronized to the L/R image stream.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-24-2010 05:28 AM                     Nope, it isn't a form of "blanking" we have that with "dark time" which is the period that no image is being projected to allow the wheel/shutter to change to the other eye. Not having enough dark time WILL cause ghosting but that is not the extra Ghostbusting that Real-D needs.  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 09-25-2010 02:59 PM                     As far as I know ghostbusting works approximately adding a "negative" version of one eye to the other one. The ghost effect would cause an eye to leak in the other one, adding itself to the perceived image. Adding a "negative" image (it's not just negative of course) to the eye, would cause the leaking image from the other eye to "fill" it, restoring the original one. Easy example: you have a grey picture on L eye. Black background with white bars on the R eye. The ghost would make you see Left eye like a grey frame, with brighter gray bars. Just take Right eye, reverse it, and subtract (partially) to Left eye before showing it. Now if you watch Left eye covering your right one, you'll see a grey frame with slightly DARKER bars. The ghost will raise the brightness where the gray is darker, restoring it to the original level! Does it make any sense? This is why ghostbusting doesn't work when the background is black: you can't go below it!  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-25-2010 03:46 PM                     ...Unless you project, "blacker than black"  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 09-25-2010 03:53 PM                     it could be an idea, to show movies with VIDEO levels (16-235) to reduce ghosting. They could call it "LCD effect"!  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.