my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Formula for Lumens vs. Screen Size?

Author Topic: Formula for Lumens vs. Screen Size? Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-22-2011 11:28 AM                        Is there any general rule-of-thumb when sizing a video projector for a known screen size? For example, we have a 55ft scope screen, 0 gain -- we may need to rent a video projector. 10K lumens, 20K? Anyone have a chart to show that kind of size/light requirement? We currently have dual Barcos R6+ Performers at 6,000 lumens each. Stacked, they were supposed to be adaquate for our screen, but the big hitch is that they are NOT stable enough to be aligned the night before a show and remain aligned (pixel for pixel) for the show the next night. Once they are turned off and cool down, you are screwed. Barco says you have to align them each time. Fine for indoors, but this is an outdoor venue and we don't have the luxury of aligning them before the show on the day-of because, well, it's out in daylight. We have a scope picture that has to be shown and I fear using only the one Barco will not make it, thus the need to rent. I would GUESS, 12k -15k would be bright enough (remember, this is outdoors and there is more ambient light than in an indoor theatre), but was hoping there is some chart that gives real numbers.  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 06-22-2011 09:37 PM                        It depends on the format and the target brightness. Since the Barcos are 4:3, projecting scope only uses half of the imager (assuming no anamorphic), so you only get 3000 lumens out of them, and that's before color calibration which eats a little light. I'm assuming your screen is 1 gain and not actually zero , and it's 23x55, that's 1,265 ft^2. To get 14 fL from a 1.0 gain screen, you'd need 1,265*14=17,710 lumens. Your two 3000 lumen projectors get you 6000 lumens total, or 4.7 fL. That's pretty dim, but it might be acceptable if you don't have much ambient light on the screen. I'd rent something brighter, preferably with a 16:9 imager to get more light efficiency. A 20k lumen projector would be ideal, but even 10k would be way better than what you've got.  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-23-2011 12:17 AM                        Thanks Robert; yes, we are not going with what we've got. Already they are talking to a rental venue about a Christie 12K native 16:9. The DVD will be scope, but letterboxed, not anamorphic. We will just zoom it up just a bit, probably not go to full scope width and leave some frame lines on top and bottom and just mask it.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 06-23-2011 06:04 AM                     Frank, if the DVD is a 2.39 but letterboxed within the 4:3 frame, then use a scaler, FIRST to use as much of the projector's imager (while maintaining proportions) before zooming in. Nowadays, it is odd that a widescreen movie is not anamorphic on a DVD.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 06-23-2011 08:26 AM                     You will not actually be throwing a letterboxed scope feature DVD on a 55ft screen? Ouch... I do hope you mean BluRay. - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 06-23-2011 10:04 AM                        For what it's worth, a more recent scope DVD will be both anamorphic and letterboxed. A letterboxed-only scope DVD is YouTube quality, with only 240 lines of resolution (half the frame, vertically). At least anamorphosis gets back some of that vertical resolution. Zooming in more to reduce the picture size is a good way to increase brightness if you don't need to fill the screen. I've done this many times before with good results. What Steve said about scalers is well taken as well--always use as much of the imager as possible for the best brightness and, secondarily, best resolution.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.