my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Lumens needed for proper 3D

Author Topic: Lumens needed for proper 3D Tom Wienholt Master Film Handler Posts: 371 From: Towson, MD, USA Registered: Dec 2002 posted 02-23-2012 01:16 PM                     I will be converting two screens to digital projection with RealD XL 3d systems. Both screens are common height 12'x28' and have a throw of 55'. What lumen requirements are necessary to properly show 3D movies with the RealD XL system?  |  IP: Logged Dominic Espinosa Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1172 From: California, U.S.A. Registered: Jan 2004 posted 02-23-2012 05:03 PM                     My math may be wrong but I believe roughly 691 (at the screen) lumens on a screen that size with lens and lightfilters in front of the meter My bad. I misread your post. That's a good question...any one know what the light loss is through the filter and glasses? You will also need to know what the loss is through the port glass.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 02-23-2012 05:52 PM                     With those two measurements, I've seen 3K bulbs used for Real D w/XL units at smaller locations using new silver screens. -Monte  |  IP: Logged Tom Wienholt Master Film Handler Posts: 371 From: Towson, MD, USA Registered: Dec 2002 posted 02-23-2012 09:09 PM                     Would it be possible to use a 2k bulb with an RealD xl system with this screen size and throw? Or if using a 3k bulb would the z-screen be sufficient? (this would avoid having to modify my ports)  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 02-23-2012 09:58 PM                       What is the projector?  |  IP: Logged Tom Wienholt Master Film Handler Posts: 371 From: Towson, MD, USA Registered: Dec 2002 posted 02-23-2012 10:04 PM                     Basically, we are trying to decide between an NEC1200C and NEC2000C. Since the 1200C is cheaper, we would prefer that system but only if it would be sufficient for 3D using RealD.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 02-23-2012 11:44 PM                     Have you poked into looking at Christies, or Barcos? These units do better with light effiency than NEC. ..and into Dolby 3D instead of Real D which you can use your existing screen-no silver screen. Dolby, you own the system outright, but with Real D, a lease is required plus percentage from tix sales heads to Real D.  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 02-24-2012 12:02 AM                       The dealer or agency of record needs to do the calculations to let you know your options. There are programs to estimate the needed light in Foot Lamberts and it will guide you to a good choice in projectors. For sure, you do not want to cut it too close or customers will think they are watching a film in a cinema with Sony equipment. It's not like film where you can buy a bigger lamphouse. Once you buy it, that's it.  |  IP: Logged Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 02-24-2012 05:36 AM                     Another vote for a white-screen solution! As you probably know, both RealD and MasterImage require a silver screen which pretty much destroys the image quality for both 2D and 3D in my opinion. Dolby, Panavision or XpanD on a white screen will all give you much better image quality – although compared to RealD XL, these 3D systems do need more lumens from the projector to achieve the required brightness levels. As pointed out by Monte, the NEC isn’t a particularly light-efficient projector. A B-series Barco or a Christie CP2220 would give you much more lumens per watt, allowing you to use smaller lamps and save money in the long run. Even if you choose to go with a white screen, an existing matte screen might not be a the most cost-effective solution. A new white screen with moderate gain will still give you great image, and will allow you to use smaller lamps (again, returning the cost of the new screen in the long run). Depending on the shape of your auditorium, a 1.4 gain white screen might be a great choice. Or if your screen is curved, you could even go for 1.8. Personally, I would probably choose XpanD, a 1.4 gain white screen, a Barco DP2K-19B and a 3000 W lamp. I know that active shutter glasses are not very popular in the States… But with Dolby or Panavision, you need about 50 % more light compared to XpanD. Pardon my little rant there. I do realize that you may have already made the business decision to go with RealD, in which case that wasn’t much help… Also, expect Steve G. to drop in any minute now and enlighten you about the benefits of anamorphic lenses with your common-height screen.  |  IP: Logged Tom Wienholt Master Film Handler Posts: 371 From: Towson, MD, USA Registered: Dec 2002 posted 02-25-2012 11:36 AM                     I haven't looked into Christies or Barcos. But, since they are known to be more efficient, I will investigate further.  |  IP: Logged Tom Wienholt Master Film Handler Posts: 371 From: Towson, MD, USA Registered: Dec 2002 posted 03-07-2012 04:01 PM                     After talking to several people from RealD and NEC projector dealers, I was told that an NEC1200C with a RealD XL system would yeild over 6fL on a 2.2 gain 12' x 29' common height silver screen. Can anyone on here confirm this?  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.