my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Changing lenses on a regular basis

Author Topic: Changing lenses on a regular basis Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 04-06-2012 04:40 AM                     I’m designing a D-Cinema system for a multi-purpose venue where two vastly different lens ratios are needed, depending on usage: For regular cinema use, they will need a 1.6–2.4 lens to fill their big screen. And for some other uses (including backdrop projections for theatrical productions), they will need a much longer lens to project an image to a smaller screen that is also farther away from the booth. Now, assuming that they will be changing between two motorized lenses let’s say once a week – will the focus/zoom/shift settings stay put for each lens? Or does a lens change always require running the ”lens home and return” procedure and creating new lens settings, to avoid problems? Any differences here between Barco/NEC/Christie? Or between 0.98/1.2" systems? The non-cinema use doesn’t necessitate 100% perfect image quality, so at least focus plane and convergence don’t have to be adjusted each time the lens is changed. Those mechanical settings can stay optimized for the shorter lens. Of course, I can tell them to use a separate (non-DCI) projector for the non-cinema use, permanently fitted with a longer lens. However, they would prefer a single-projector solution if that can be made to work reliably without too much pain.  |  IP: Logged Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 04-06-2012 05:55 AM                     It'll need re-calibrated each and every time it's changed, and I think I'd be right in saying (certainly on Barcos & Kinotons) the lens files may not be accurate after the lens change, so those should be re-set as well. An easier solution might be to spec 2 fixed lenses and re-size? Or use your 2 zooms but set up for fixed lens working. Not ideal in picture/light terms but it'd be a workaround.  |  IP: Logged Pietro Clarici Expert Film Handler Posts: 136 From: Foligno (PG) Italy Registered: Sep 2008 posted 04-06-2012 07:29 AM                        You could spec a single lens, for the big screen. When needed, zoom out as far as possibile and then create a screen file scaling external sources to the matrix portion that fits the smaller screen. It will be less than 1080p (unless you have a 4K projector) and you will lose light, but it could be acceptable.  |  IP: Logged Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 04-06-2012 07:49 AM                     Thanks for the replies, guys. Pietro: that’s the first thing I had in mind, but the light loss might be just too much in this case. To make the small screen bright enough, I’d have to specify a huge lamp, which would then have to be dimmed down somehow during big-screen use… I guess that using an anamorphic attachment for scope on the big screen would help as well, as that would allow me to use a longer lens (thus allowing me to zoom closer to the size of the small screen, losing less light). Still, any real-life experiences on regular lens-changing – also on Christies and NEC’s – would be much appreciated!  |  IP: Logged David Zylstra Master Film Handler Posts: 432 From: Novi, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 04-06-2012 09:05 AM                     Christie has a motorized auxiliary lens mount that can be used to drop an anamorphic lens into place, or in the case of sites with older lenses a 1.25X converter that is used for scope (i.e. a fixed height screen is fitted to flat, then this lens is used to blow up the scope picture to fit the height) . . . . you could do the reverse and find an auxiliary lens that will make the picture fit the further screen.  |  IP: Logged Chuck McGregor Film Handler Posts: 47 From: Bremen, ME, USA Registered: Mar 2012 posted 04-06-2012 09:45 AM                     quote: Antti Nayha including backdrop projections for theatrical productions I'm just curious about front projection being used for this purpose. It is typically done with rear projection, there being the issue of actors, sets, or whatever between projector and the screen. But, this may not be the case with your physical layout but I have trouble envisioning this. Typically, video projectors (e.g. Sony VLP series just as an example, not a recommendation) with really low throw ratios and throw distances are used because of limited upstage space. As well, the non-DCI imagery created for such use would likely be in some video projector friendly VGA format. There can be other benefits to a separate (and portable) projector for theatrical use, but don't know enough details about your situation to comment. Have these issues have been considered?  |  IP: Logged Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 04-10-2012 09:43 AM                     Yeah, those issues were considered, but rear projection wouldn’t work in this venue due to the geometry… However, in the end they’re leaning towards getting a secondary ceiling-mounted projector for backdrops only. This one will be installed closer to the secondary screen, and projecting from a higher angle (with heavy keystone correction) to avoid getting actors in the way. The D-Cinema system will only project to the primary screen, so no need to worry about lens changes after all.  |  IP: Logged Dave Macaulay Film God Posts: 2321 From: Toronto, Canada Registered: Apr 2001 posted 04-12-2012 10:47 AM                     "To make the small screen bright enough, I’d have to specify a huge lamp, which would then have to be dimmed down somehow during big-screen use…" That doesn't sound right to me. The smaller screen should need less light than the bigger screen.  |  IP: Logged Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 04-12-2012 11:22 AM                     The smaller screen is also much farther away, remember? So without changing lenses, I wouldn’t be able to zoom close enough. I would have to scale the picture smaller digitally in that case, probably losing something like 75% of light and resolution. I know, I should have drawn a picture in the first place.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.