my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Volfoni 3D

Author Topic: Volfoni 3D Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 07-09-2012 04:42 PM                     Anyone any experience of Volfoni 3D? There appears to be 2 versions, passive polarised which looks like a cross between MasterImage and RealD. Also an active system which lookds like Xpand. http://www.volfoni.com/marche-cine.html  |  IP: Logged Tony Bandiera Jr Film God Posts: 3067 From: Moreland Idaho Registered: Apr 2004 posted 07-09-2012 07:15 PM                     Just finished my second install with the Active system, it works great and looks great. Very easy to install, and the cabling they provide makes it pretty much "plug and play" (at least with Dolby DSS200 and Christie CP-2210 and 2220.) The active glasses seem pretty sturdy and are comfortable (at least for my melon). The control box has "internal emitters" built in so you can, if the control box isn't buried in the rack, use the glasses in the booth easily to check your images. Drawbacks: One major one, there is virtually NO documentation with these systems, but they did have great support online when we had a minor issue last week. The cable from the projector to the control box is a bit on the short side but you can easily extend it (and the emitter panel cables) with a standard DB9 male to female extension. And finally (don't know if this is a drawback really) the glasses use the CR2032 flat batteries. Otherwise, I'd give it a 4 out of five stars.  |  IP: Logged Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 07-10-2012 07:01 AM                     Thanks Tony, that's veru useful. I've got a customer interested in it.  |  IP: Logged Cameron Glendinning Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 845 From: West Ryde, Sydney, NSW Australia Registered: Dec 2005 posted 07-10-2012 10:21 PM                     Panastereo do a good active 3d, you can even wash the glasses  |  IP: Logged Tony Bandiera Jr Film God Posts: 3067 From: Moreland Idaho Registered: Apr 2004 posted 07-12-2012 12:01 AM                     You're welcome Pete. Cameron, got a link to those glasses and do they sell the complete system? (If it uses IR to control the glasses.)  |  IP: Logged Ian Freer Expert Film Handler Posts: 135 From: Wellington, New Zealand Registered: Oct 2003 posted 07-12-2012 06:44 PM                     Panastereo 3D is an active glasses system complete with IR distribution hardware. Ray Derrick, occasionally active on this forum, is the guy to speak to about it...  |  IP: Logged Geoff Newitt Film Handler Posts: 49 From: FARINGDON, OXFORDSHIRE, UK Registered: Dec 2011 posted 07-20-2012 05:10 PM                     Pete - I've got some experience with Volfoni... I think I've even got a demo set of the active system in the garage (don't tell Marc John!). It is *very* similar to XpanD - the control boxes appear to have come out of the same factory, and in some experiments both emitters and glasses were compatible with early XpanD systems (not later ones). Our mutual friend Rob Younger had a system at his Richmond cinema before he put the dual projector system in. Some people prefer the glasses to the XpanD ones; the ability to clip different arms on to switch between adult/child sizes is a plus. I have heard some negative comment about battery life, but I'm not sure how serious this is.  |  IP: Logged Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 07-22-2012 05:55 AM                     quote: Geoff Newitt Some people prefer the glasses to the XpanD ones; the ability to clip different arms on to switch between adult/child sizes is a plus. XpanD also has child-sized ear pieces and nose pieces available for their X101 glasses. I've only tried Volfoni active glasses on once, and that wasn't in an actual showing so can't comment on the image quality... The glasses are notably lighter than XpanD's X101 glasses (the heavier, machine-washable model) and even slightly lighter than XpanD X103. However, the nosepiece is somehow much less comfortable on my face compared to XpanD. It just feels a bit tight even though my nose is pretty narrow, and a colleague with a very different facial structure noted the same thing. I've heard claims that Volfoni is brighter than XpanD, but it would sure be nice to see some independent test results. Anyone...? By the way, Volfoni seems to be included in the FHD3DGI licensee list, which might mean that they will soon be compatible between various other active 3D systems – including but not limited to XpanD.  |  IP: Logged Geoff Newitt Film Handler Posts: 49 From: FARINGDON, OXFORDSHIRE, UK Registered: Dec 2011 posted 07-23-2012 06:58 AM                     Volfoni is no brighter than XpanD - or indeed any non-Dolby 3D system - it's just marketing guff. I was a party to side by side tests between Volfoni, XpanD, and RealD. The only significant difference (more than the odd % or two) was for the XL unit.  |  IP: Logged Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 07-23-2012 08:23 AM                     OK, thanks! According to the usually quoted figures, XpanD should be around 20% brighter than Z-screen RealD (18% efficiency vs. 15%) but it's interesting to hear about your test result. It might worth noting that when XpanD updated their recommended projector settings last year to ensure compatibility with new glass models, they increased the dark time from 700 μs to 1100 μs. That means a darker picture – I didn't measure it, but the difference is enough to be visible on a naked eye.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 07-25-2012 04:49 AM                     There are so many different versions of shutter glasses out there now, no one can really tell brightness by manufacturer. Even Volfoni has three different glasses, and of these, two different LCD technologies are used even in the same glasses type. Current Volfoni glasses are brighter than older versions of Xpand glasses. I have no comparison with the more recent Xpand glasses. I also like the design and weight of the Volfoni glasses a lot more. They are very light and decent looking, I hate these ugly phantom-of-the-opera masks that some manufacturer (incl. Panavision) sell. - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Antti Nayha Master Film Handler Posts: 268 From: Helsinki, Finland Registered: Oct 2008 posted 07-25-2012 06:33 AM                     I think the Volfoni glasses that I tried on were of the EDGE 1.2 variety. They looked something like this. One of the testimonials at Panavision's web site actually mentions the ugliness of their glasses as an advantage: less glasses stolen by patrons.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 07-25-2012 08:46 PM                     Volfoni Edge Manual with techspecs: http://www.volfoni.com/IMG/pdf/MUV110064-V1R2_EDGE1-2_UserManual_ENG.pdf - Carsten  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.