|
|
Author
|
Topic: New small digital cinema - effective solution (?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bajsic Bojan
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 190
From: Ljubljana, Si, Eu
Registered: Aug 2008
|
posted 01-30-2013 03:19 PM
Yes, new machines are an option for this. But who will say now: "That is ok, there are no problems I see using this technology."
It hasn't been proven, it will take some time. Of course, it might be an ok choice. It might. I might not. Who knows.
The C series is pretty common in europe. Many people use it. Parts are interchangeable. People have experience with it. Known issues have been more or less resolved or at least pointed out, and people who service them will know what is going on (usually).
Regarding the 4k/48. I wait for the day when this is standard. I truly wish 2k would get downscaled distribution. It is not comparable to decent 35mm. But will it be this year? No. In 5 years? No. Maybe 10. Maybe. There have been what, 40, 50 movies released in 4k? There is a huge market for 4k? There have been how many 48fps movies out? How many servers/imb combos can playback 4k @ 4k/48fps.
Another question is content availability. We had 1 4k title in the past 2 years of dci up for grabs here. But we run mostly arthouse and independent fare. The amount of 4k material in this sector is nonexistent. Yes, might change in the coming years, but the lower end of the indie market is just now coming to grips with an HD workflow, they can run/edit all their materials on their fancy mac computers and have a blast. The computing and esp. storage needs for a 4k workflow are larger and not something 'everyone' can afford nowadays. Another 'Maybe' is the RED revolution. Yes, 'Maybe' it will work. Depends on many things. The end customer is not one of them however.
On the Sony note, sure the 515 seems like everyone's cup of tea nowadays. It's 4k. It's competitively priced. It has some nice nice features. Still, its completely new. We'll see how it performs. How UHMs preform over time. The fact that its a 150kg beast might be a turnoff. I am however as many others, a potential client.
No way to know. efficient or not, depends on what you'll be doing with the equipment. If it is USED efficiently, great. If its bought efficiently with no intention of efficient use of it's features, then how can it be bought efficiently?
And who knows what the future brings, right now we're all talking (again) about 4k. LAst years 48fps question is almost nonexistent. 11.1 sound or whatever is on very few 'to do' lists, or orders. However, more and more is being done to make the cinema image go as quickly and shortly to other platforms. More is being done in order to get images to cinemas in a form closer to the broadcast norm, possibly in the same codec. Noone is really concerned about that, right. More is being done to ease the way to get the cinema experience out of the cinema... That is the future.
hmm. Ok, i'll shut up a little, rant over
Anyhow. Quoting for a new cinema install, i personally would opt for a technology which has been used and proven. That's what kept decent 35mm projection alive all these years. It is what can keep standard digital projection alive for a couple more. What will come next is anyones guess. Lasers? Thin sheets of oled? 5 voice of god channels? Demolition of most cinemas? Let's find out.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|