|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: UK Adverts from P&D -half are in smaller resolution - issues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gavin Lewarne
Master Film Handler
Posts: 278
From: Plymouth, UK
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 03-05-2013 12:58 PM
Dave - all the scope-trailers-in-flat I have encountered so far almost fill to the sides, again only about 2 inches of black on the sides. We always play the trailers in flat, since they are all labelled as flat (so far) Our keystoning issues are only really visible on the sides, the top and bottoms are straight as far as I can tell eyeballing it
Stephen - The P&D adverts are now sent out on a CRU drive, Dolby masters and ships them on behalf of P&D
As for our keystoning, it isnt very much, probably about 3 pixel widths difference on the sides. Im just trying to make as professional a presentation as possible with the equipment i have.
We are so old-school our side masking is manual
We have to change it before each screening to match the feature being played, so if the feature is scope the ads/trailers have a lot of black on the sides. This is primarily the reason i want to find a solution for scaling / getting rid of the side black on the adverts(in flat) as the "unused" pixels are still a little brighter than the blank screen. It just looks yucky. I doubt our customers either notice or care, but i do.
Oh, how i wish we had automagical motorised masking
| IP: Logged
|
|
Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"
Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 03-06-2013 11:24 AM
Your setup sounds similar to mine -- DSS200 and Barco DP2K-32B.
The DSS200 only "sees" the first 14 presets on the Barco, so I assigned the relevant ones to fit within that range. Otherwise, it's not possible to use the DSS200 to automate the preset change.
My Barco has hard buttons on the projector for the first 6 presets, so 1-6 are populated with the most common formats, and 7-13 are assigned to those that are less-commonly used.
Preset 14 -- the last one that the DSS200 will "see" -- is a "wild" preset, for material that can't be handled by the first 13 presets. Basically, it entails re-assigning the lens, screen and LSC files.
(Maintaining a constant name for that preset -- "DCP Variable" -- means I don't have to reboot the DSS200 to force it to recognize and update the name of the new preset.)
For ads, I would avoid using the lens to zoom the image, because that means having to build in a few seconds of black each time to hide the zoom, and I just hate having more than one "black patch" in a pre-show.
But, more importantly, every time you disturb the lens, you risk losing focus. I know this stuff is supposed to work perfectly but, in reality, my Barco needs lens recalibration about every 2 weeks. So, I'm not going to tempt fate unnecessarily by increasing the number of lens operations that happen in a single screening. It would be just my luck that the ads will look great, and feature will end up out of focus. That is Murphy's Law.
So, instead, I would create a few presets that contain just the screen files, to conceal the keystoning. For example, initialize with the "complete" 1.85 preset, and then use the "screen only" presets when jumping around between aspect ratios. I don't lose sleep over ads that don't fit the screen completely.
I haven't played around with scaling but, if it changes instantaneously, you could add that to your "quick change" presets. But, personally, I would avoid scaling in this case, because it will mean cropping. I'm okay with letterboxing and pillarboxing for ads and previews. To reiterate, it's not something I'm going to lose sleep over; there are too many more-important things on the radar.
Let Pearl & Dean see that their ads don't fill the screen. If they want full-screen ads, they need to make full-screen ads. This isn't exactly their first day at the rodeo. If you make up for their shortcomings, then you are part of your own problem.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|