|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: NEC 1100 Digital Projector
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antti Nayha
Master Film Handler
Posts: 268
From: Helsinki, Finland
Registered: Oct 2008
|
posted 10-26-2013 08:56 PM
Apparently the NC1100L is 5,000 lumens. They've also been talking about an upcoming NC1040L model, that can accommodate two or more laser light units to boost the light output in a linear fashion. The "lamp" life is estimated at 20,000 hours.
Some links (sorry for not including the full text of all three articles): Jun 24 press release (NC1040L, amongst other stuff) Oct 21 press release (NC1100L) Sep 26 Manice article (NC1040L)
According to the Manice article, a NC1040L setup with two light units, adding up to 10,000 lumens, would sell for 100,000 euros = around 140,000 USD.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 10-27-2013 12:10 AM
Then once again, it is stupid option. Using the nice and easy $1000/lamp number. At 3000 hours, that would be 7 lamps or $7000 (and it will be less). The cost difference is FAR more than that spread. At 10,000 lumens...in an NEC...that puts you in an NC2000C running their bottom-end 4KW lamp (of the "approved lamps)... and again, it is FAR, FAR cheaper to run xenon.
If one is not trying to get over 25000 lumens, until lasers get a lot cheaper, they are bad money. If you are putting in 6-8KW xenons, then lasers make start to make the financial argument. Unless you are running Dolby 3D. With lasers, Dolby 3D doesn't need the filter wheel so its light output should more than double and be in competition for the brightest 3D, ironically.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 10-27-2013 09:31 AM
According to some sources, the 5000Lumen spec reflects the current laser regulations. They would not be able to sell it for operation in public with more brightness under current regulations.
While there have been prototype LIP demonstrations by every manufacturer, I'm really wondering why NEC now comes out with a ready-to-market device with these mediocre specs? Just to show off? However, the 1600:1 contrast spec bothers me most...
IMAX/Barco are getting more specific towards their first IMAX LIP installations in 2014, which are said to be dual 4k projection setups. While manufactured by Barco, they seem to follow the KODAK dedicated LIP design (IMAX acquired KODAKs LIP patents), not Barcos own retrofit LIP design demonstrated earlier. Hence IMAX quotes a 8000:1 contrast spec. And since for now these LIPs are only intended for IMAX' largest screens (now still on 15/70), they will probably be in the 50.000+ lumen range (single projector).
Now, THAT makes sense, replacing two extremely expensive 15kW Xenon bulbs, but the NEC at 5000 lumens, I don't get it...
@Kerry: The dual NSH lamp unit is the NEC900C. The 1200 uses Xenon like the rest of the DLP family. I am nearly sure the NC1100L is 'just' a NC900C with a laser illumination addon, see images:
NC900C: http://www.astera.ru/news/images/2012/2012_06_21/NEC_NC900C.jpg NC1100L: http://cdn.slashgear.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/1100l.jpg
Hence the same mediocre contrast number as all S2k machines.
Search the forum for NC900, there are some previous discussions.
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|