Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Undead Pixel (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Undead Pixel
Lincoln Spector
Film Handler

Posts: 46
From: Albany, CA, USA
Registered: Mar 2012


 - posted 05-09-2014 03:46 PM      Profile for Lincoln Spector   Author's Homepage   Email Lincoln Spector   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi, folks.

I attended two screenings at San Francisco's Castro Theatre over the past week, and noticed the same problem both times. There was a red dot in the lower-left corner of the screen. It was most noticeable in dark scenes, and disappeared entirely when that part of the screen was bright white.

I figure that it must be a red pixel stuck on, so that it is reflecting red light even when it's not supposed to do so. Hence the title (coined by a friend) "undead pixel."

I saw the same thing a couple of years ago on one of the screens at the Kabuki Theater (also in SF). That one was blue, but oddly, also in the lower-left corner. That one disappeared after awhile.

Can someone tell me more about these things, and how much it costs to fix them?

Thanks,

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 05-09-2014 04:13 PM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It costs 15.000-18.000 US% to fix it. If the machine is out of warranty. A lightengine swap.

There may be rare occasions where they disappear after a while, but most of the time, if they are there, they stay.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 05-09-2014 04:23 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oops, double posted with Carsten. In a TI-based machine each pixel is a tiny tiny micro mirror mounted on a piezoelectric crystal which moves the mirror to reflect light towards the prism or towards a light dump - usually when they get stuck in a given position, that's it, though they sometimes do free themselves up as you have noted. The only way I've heard of fixing them in the field is to replace the entire light engine. Definitely not cheap unless it's under warranty.

On at least the Christie machines there is a clean air source called a LAD (Laminar Air Device) which directs clean filtered air across the surface of each DMD imager both for cooling and to try to prevent dust particles from settling on each device. Also, sometimes the piezo mounts simply fail. When enough pixels get stuck, especially if those pixels are near the center of the image area, the entire light engine (all three imagers) will have to be replaced.

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 05-09-2014 05:51 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Castro is aware of the stuck pixel and is pondering a repair vs. new 4K projector.

 |  IP: Logged

Randy Stankey
Film God

Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-09-2014 07:16 PM      Profile for Randy Stankey   Email Randy Stankey   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The digital equivalent of dust and scratches on film.

Maybe not as prevalent but WAY more expensive to remedy.

The inevitability of these types of problems in video versus film is debatable but a contentious film handler can minimize the problem below the threshold of perception with nothing more than common sense and attention to detail. With video, the solution is complicated, expensive and there is little that even a good operator can do to stop it.

This is not to say that film is better than video or vice versa. I am saying that the problems are roughly congruent and that this is prima facia evidence that the "dust and scratches" issue is little more than empty "digital evangelism."

If I am guilty of "film evangelism" it is only to say that digital ain't all that it is cracked up to be just because the digital evangelists say so.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 05-09-2014 08:33 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree. There are plusses and minusses to almost everything.

I was once asked when I was speaking to a large group of theatre owners: "What is the best projector?" My answer: "What problem are you most able to tolerate?"

 |  IP: Logged

Geoff Jones
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 579
From: Broomfield, CO, USA
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 05-09-2014 10:23 PM      Profile for Geoff Jones   Author's Homepage   Email Geoff Jones   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Randy Stankey
The digital equivalent of dust and scratches on film.
I disagree completely. Dust and scratches on film disappear as soon as you get a new film (or a replacement print).

A stuck pixel is there for every single movie you show until the machine is repaired or it happens to go away.

 |  IP: Logged

Marcel Birgelen
Film God

Posts: 3357
From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
Registered: Feb 2012


 - posted 05-10-2014 04:35 AM      Profile for Marcel Birgelen   Email Marcel Birgelen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The fully-priced light-engine-swap thing really is a rip-off. The actual DMD costs a few hundred bucks at the most and sure, there is some labor involved in replacing it. It's probably not something you can do on location, but still, charging full price for a new light engine is still outrageous. I'm pretty sure those "defective" light engines get overhauled and serve as spares afterwards.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-10-2014 06:37 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The DMDs for DCinema are more than a couple hundred bucks. Note, to the best of my knowledge, all of the DLP companies WILL repair a light engine. You have to allow for up to an 8-week turnaround though and it does save considerable $$$ since you are only paying for the freight, part and alignment time.

What this means though is that the FIRST failure you have of a particular light engine type (1.38 1.2, .98, .69) of any brand you have, you will have to buy a light engine (and they can be over $20K...with the 4K engines in the high $20Ks) so you can send the bad out out for repairs...when it comes back, put it on the shelf for the next one...so on the second failure, you are going to be below $10K and I hear closer to $5K for the repair.

I know one customer that is contemplating buying one of the small projectors like the NEC NC900C as a space saver spare tire so if his main projector ever fails, he can throw it in quick and dirty to keep going while the main projector gets repaired.

I think if you have a complex of any size (or a chain with several locations), it would be wise to have a spare projector on-site or in the region. It isn't a matter of "if" but "when" you will need a spare part NOW! I've had an ICP go down on a Friday night...try to get a part sent out on a Saturday! While Barco will ship 7-days and even same day...that will cost you body parts!

If you keep clones of your projectors, you should be able to get your spare projector up pretty fast...set up the lens files or just rob the part you need (whichever gets you up and going faster).

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-10-2014 08:40 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad needs to invent the digital equivalent of FilmGuard that you can pour on the DMD and clean away stuck pixels. They are just mirrors after all. The DMDGuard would even lubricate the little micro hinges so lagtime will decrease; it might even make them less brittle...which can't be a bad thing!

They are lucky that stuck pixel was not somewhere in the center of the screen.

My fear is, that if history has shown us anything, it's that exhibitors are less that forthcoming when it comes to shelling out bucks to replace worn or defective parts. If you think a theatre owner who was reluctant to spend $800 to replace a xenon bulb that underlit his screen because it was way past its prime, imagine his reluctance in shelling out $20K just to shut off a single red dot somewhere on his screen.

And to follow Geoff's thought, dust and scratches go way with the next print, they are also very fluid and intermittent -- they are there one 1/24th of a second, gone the next. But my friends, that stuck red dot, no matter how minute, will stay in that picture throughout the ENTIRE film. Try as you might, you will NOT be able to ignore it and after awhile, it will start to look like a buring xenon headlight aimed right for your eyeballs. You think scratches are annoying? Just wait till this stuff ages and these things start popping up in theatres all over the place.

Luckily for patrons in ancient times (before digital), at least back then xenons past their lifespan eventually just wouldn't strike and they HAD to be replaced. But that chip is going to work on and on and on with its stuck pixel and it may never be replaced. [Eek!]

It's not a happy digital future I see.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 05-10-2014 10:33 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
So if the red dot danced around all over the picture, sometimes dozens of red dots on EACH frame (but always in a different spot from frame to frame), then that would make it ok?

After all that's what people running film without FilmGuard had...constant little dots flashing to a minor or extreme amount (depending on the quality of the operator). Let's also not forget the CAP code too.

So just to make sure I'm understanding this, it's ok to have BLACK dots, but not a RED dot...or is it that IF the red dots danced around, then THAT would be acceptable?

[Razz]

One thing I will agree with, the "cheaper" theater owners out there are bound to just keep running with dead pixels, just like how they wouldn't shell out any money to change that bulb when it started to get dark, or for film cleaning supplies, or to pay for a competent projectionist, or for that matter...quality film equipment. It's all the same.

At least with digital when someone screws up the building of a playlist, every single show for the rest of that movie's performances at that location doesn't have various colored lines running through it. It only affects that ONE show. [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-11-2014 12:37 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
On the BARCO: One of my 32B units decided to lose a rectifier this evening.

Got an error mentioning that lamp is lit, but one power supply is turned off.

Had to switch off CLO and go to Standard light output, then move the slider to not tax the other two rectifiers in the unit. Odd seeing a 65BA2 bulb only running 4100w due to the loss of that one rectifier.

Image on the screen looks okey, but a little bit dimmer, but to a layman, it was still watchable and like nothing occurred.

Called our tech department on this issue. Should get a PS sometime this week.

Fun things to look for.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Carsten Kurz
Film God

Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 05-11-2014 07:46 AM      Profile for Carsten Kurz   Email Carsten Kurz   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Monte L Fullmer
Had to switch off CLO and go to Standard light output, then move the slider to not tax the other two rectifiers in the unit. Odd seeing a 65BA2 bulb only running 4100w due to the loss of that one rectifier.
Ooops. Didn't even know that operation mode was possible?

As to stuck pixel - TI has a pretty good history of long-term testing for their DMDs. While these are micromechanical devices, they have a surprising track record of NOT failing. So, while it does occur, it seems it is safe to assume it will not simply increase over time with equipment aging. It would indeed be a nightmare for the future of digital cinema if stuck pixel were a natural incidence of wear or aging of the machines. Stuck pixel also barely exist on home cinema or presentation dlp projectors. Just try to imagine how many of these individual mirrors TI produced to date... 100.000*3 DMDs in cinema machines alone, multiply by 2.000.000 to 3.000.000 micromirrors... per DMD.

I have seen red dot clusters on a fairly new machine. It was extremely annoying. It seems they typically occur more often on new installations and thus are covered by warranty most of the time. But they are not always a matter of a defect DMD, can also be bad contacts/signaling/memory defects.

Problem is that stuck pixels wil usually occur only on one of the three primary colours, and always 'full on'. Fully saturated Red, Green or Blue is naturally more visible than most typical film/wear artifacts.

- Carsten

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-11-2014 10:28 AM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Carsten Kurz
Stuck pixel also barely exist on home cinema or presentation dlp projectors.
I'm not sure how rare this phenomenon is. I had quite the star field on my DLP rear projection TV. There were dozens of stuck pixels. The website that I bought the replacement DMD chip from seemed to sell plenty of them. One day I'll get around to photographing the old DMD. At the correct angle, you can easily see the stuck pixels with the naked eye.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-11-2014 10:48 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If the pixels could be stuck off...then I suspect they would be FAR less of an issue...that it is right for one to have an image with 2/3rds of the color on a pixel or completely black at all times but stuck on...becomes VERY hard to ignore over time.

I think there will be a market for those that can change out the DMDs AND get them aligned again. I've been around it being done and it isn't all that easy. To get everything aligned again, one has to work in 3 dimensions to get the height as well as the normal convergence aspects right again and it is best done on a jig but I could be done in the projector with enough trial and error.

Monte...no need to go out of CLO...the projector will NOT kill itself. Those power supplies will only go as high as they can run and stop. Note, ALL barco multi-supply projectors will do this...that is run on what is left to keep the show going. And you'll never have an easier time changing a supply either!

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.