|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: The Dolby application, “Jupiter Client”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian DeCiancio
Film Handler
Posts: 52
From: Warren, OH, USA
Registered: Sep 2002
|
posted 08-21-2014 08:03 PM
"out of curiosity, what happens if you try and setup more than 3 screens? Will the TMS refuse to work or will it just become slow and unreliable?"
From experience with the DSS100 built in TMS, up to 3 servers works perfectly, 4 will be fine 90% of the time, but 5 or more causes the control interfaces to become unstable and crash over and over. The interface will restart, connect to the host TMS, then more often than not, restart repeatedly and/or cause any or all of the other servers to restart as well.
Forcing the non-TMS servers to boot locally can stabilize the system somewhat, but not reliably.
When this happens, you are forced to either use your scheduled shows or manually select and play from the DSP100. Obviously, you then also lose the convenience of seeing the status and remaining time of the shows in one convenient place.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Nerijus Marmokas
Film Handler
Posts: 41
From: Panevezys / Lithuania
Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted 08-22-2014 06:05 AM
Hi,
I have also tried running 4 screens in TMS, like Steve. Only after a week or so it became laggy, sometimes one screen or another would "hang" (no control of the cursor, keybord not responding, all data on monitor is frozen), display incorrect information (like missing clips, schedule events, playlists - but those missing things exist and you can see them when connected to local server ). Restarting TMS, all servers, or even un-configuring them would fix all issues just for a while. Anyway, as the playback is DSS top priority, there was no harm on that. No shows was lost or interrupted. So I guess it can be called pretty smooth operation
Also, we have an 11 and 8 screen cinemas, with DSL100s taking control of each cinemas DSS screen servers. I can confirm what Brian DeCiancio said. It is only stabile up to 5 screens. Cant say anything on DSL200. Haven't tried this baby yet Maybe it is has more processing power and is more stabile with multiple auditoriums?
Regards, Nerijus
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|