my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » 3D flash ratio

Author Topic: 3D flash ratio Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 12-05-2014 04:30 AM                     Hi all, Silly question for you. I am aware that when setting up 3D 6:2 means triple flash and 4:2 means double flash. But what does that number mean? What exactly 6:2 means? Thanks  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 12-05-2014 05:20 AM                     I guess a lot of people don't really know what those numbers mean . The first number is the Frame Rate Multiplier and the second one how many "images" form a complete frame. For 2D this is 1 and for stereoscopic 3D it is 2.  |  IP: Logged Nerijus Marmokas Film Handler Posts: 41 From: Panevezys / Lithuania Registered: Jan 2012 posted 12-05-2014 06:14 AM                     In other words, projector flashes same frame three times, for each eye. It goes something like this:  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 12-05-2014 06:36 AM                     Yeah and in your scheme, it would be 2:2, 4:2 and 6:2. There also is a setting for the frame sequence: L->R or R->L, which isn't encoded in this N:M notation. You need to flash the same image multiple times to get rid of noticeable flicker. Anything above about 90Hz can be safely assumed to beyond the flicker fusion threshold with normal 3D content, whereas 48Hz clearly isn't. This scheme also doesn't account for the dark time between each image change. This dark time is required to compensate for things like transitions of the polarizer or color wheel surface and minor timing/sync issues between the components involved.  |  IP: Logged Harold Hallikainen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 906 From: Denver, CO, USA Registered: Aug 2009 posted 12-05-2014 03:19 PM                        On flicker fusion frequency, what effect does duty cycle have? For simplicity, let's start with 2D. We typically flash the image 2 or 3 times per frame. But, as the duty cycle approaches 100%, the dark time approaches zero. If we do 3 flashes with no dark time, it's just one flash. So, how much dark time is required between flashes so they have the desired effect of reducing perceived flicker? Harold  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 12-05-2014 03:39 PM                     thanks everybody for the clear explanation. Then running 3D 2:2 is basically single flashing. Which takes to a slightly OT question: I know some XpanD units are not capable of 3D HFR. If the unit does not sync when set at 4:2 but it does at 2:2, does that mean that that unit is not HFR ready? Or maybe do XpanD work single flash (in HFR) as some older MI units? Thanks  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 12-05-2014 04:36 PM                     quote: Harold Hallikainen On flicker fusion frequency, what effect does duty cycle have? For simplicity, let's start with 2D. We typically flash the image 2 or 3 times per frame. But, as the duty cycle approaches 100%, the dark time approaches zero. If we do 3 flashes with no dark time, it's just one flash. So, how much dark time is required between flashes so they have the desired effect of reducing perceived flicker? A DCI DLP projector runs with a duty cycle of 100% in normal 2D mode. The next frame can be loaded into the DMDs while the current frame is being displayed and can be globally switched. There's no need for a sync time. That's also why there is no more visible strobe effect. If you increase the duty cycle, you indeed decrease the interval with no picture on screen. At rates above 90Hz it will have not much effect on the amount of perceived flicker, but a longer duty cycle will have a positive impact on the brightness. quote: Marco Giustini Which takes to a slightly OT question: I know some XpanD units are not capable of 3D HFR. If the unit does not sync when set at 4:2 but it does at 2:2, does that mean that that unit is not HFR ready? Or maybe do XpanD work single flash (in HFR) as some older MI units? As far as I know, every XpanD 3D system, even the early models, should be capable of doing at least 48 FPS single flash (2:2). All newer models are also capable of doing 48 FPS at 4:2. You might need a firmware update for those earlier models though.  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 12-05-2014 07:00 PM                     I was told the latest models, where you plug the sync cable directly in the emitter, were already HFR ready. XpanD say not-ready units can be amended with a "cost-effective procedure". Are those units SW upgradable?  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 12-05-2014 07:21 PM                     Those who plug directly into the sync without the "Distribution module" are the models suited for the smaller rooms. They should support double flash in HFR out of the box. All units should do at least single flash in HFR, without any upgrade. As far as I remember, the Double Flash upgrade for older units is indeed essentially just a software update for the distribution unit, but not a free update.  |  IP: Logged Carsten Kurz Film God Posts: 4340 From: Cologne, NRW, Germany Registered: Aug 2009 posted 12-06-2014 05:20 AM                     HFR capability does not indicate flashing capability, unfortunately. e.g. MasterImage issued a note two years ago stating that their MasterImage MI2100 system was 'fully HFR compliant'. With it came instructions on how to setup the system for 48fps operation. It then actually uses single flashing at 96Hz... LCD shutters do not have the mechanical limitations of spinning wheels like MI (Dolby managed to get their smaller wheels rotating faster without a problem), but they may have issues with increased dark time vs ghosting, or, the transmitter/receiver circuits may have sync catch windows that do not allow large variations of the flashing rate (without software changes). But to my knowledge, all LCD shutter systems are HFR compliant or at least can be upgraded to HFR without much trouble. - Carsten  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 12-06-2014 06:06 AM                     The unit in questions does not sync at 4:2, but it does at 2:2, without changing any other parameter. Is there a way to confirm whether the unit is not HFR-4:2 compatible (software version, serial number...)?  |  IP: Logged Marcel Birgelen Film God Posts: 3357 From: Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands Registered: Feb 2012 posted 12-06-2014 08:12 AM                     I think you've proven this particular unit doesn't support double flash in HFR then . The unit should auto-detect the sync rate, if it doesn't, it needs an upgrade. You should just drop them an e-mail and ask for an offer for the upgrade.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-06-2014 04:25 PM                     when you are testing the sync...are you using 48fps target? You have to have the right frame rate coming out of the server.  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 12-08-2014 05:02 PM                     yes, HFR clip from the server.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.