|
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: Dolby server or Barco Alchemy server ?
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 06-03-2015 06:01 AM
Dolby's server (DSS line) concludes sales at the end of this month. Support will continue for a minimum of 3 years. So that should be a factor in your decision.
That said, without a doubt, Dolby has the best user interface (GUI). The Dolby server is THE most reliable server in the industry, bar none. So if I have a choice between the two, it is a slam dunk, the Dolby DSS server...in fact, I'm putting one in today and have more installs slated this month and even next year (customer is pre-buying for an addition to their existing theatre and they have the Dolby server and agree, that is what they want).
The Barco ICMP (Alchemy) is the new-kid on the block. As such, it has had its share of growing pains as the real world has shown its problems. It hasn't implemented all of its features yet either but they are being added with each release. It is the first IMB to also replace the TI ICP module with its own. What this means is that they have removed a bottleneck in the bandwidth that is limiting other companies to a 4K 30fps (including alternative content) and 3D to 2K. The Alchemy will top out at 4K/60 (2D) and 4K/30 (3D).
Since you are putting it into a "C" series projector, the benefits of 4K will be lost on your projector. Though I heard at Cinema Con this year that TI is looking to offer 4K to .98" machines around 2017. But what will servers be like if/when that happens?
Dolby's server has a traditional keyboard/monitor type interface (but has VNC as well as a dedicated client application). The Alchemy has one either use a client application (Commander) or the touchpanel (also running commander) as the user interface.
And then there are your future needs. If you plan to expand or build your world around a platform, the Dolby DSS line is at the end, the Alchemy is at the beginning.
There are other items that differentiate the two but those are what I consider the major decision points at the moment. I'm sure others will have other nuances between the two.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|