my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » NEC 2500C vs. Barco DP-100

Author Topic: NEC 2500C vs. Barco DP-100 Brian DeCiancio Film Handler Posts: 52 From: Warren, OH, USA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 02-22-2016 06:06 PM                        Can anyone tell me which of these two Series 1 units produce a better picture and puts more ACTUAL light on the screen using a 6k bulb? I've read the specs on both, but am interested in real-world experience. Would you choose one over the other if you have them both in your possession? I need opinions on these two models only. Thanks in advance.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-22-2016 08:42 PM                     You might really be more concerned about which one you can still get all the parts for and which one you can't. Mark  |  IP: Logged Brian DeCiancio Film Handler Posts: 52 From: Warren, OH, USA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 02-22-2016 10:03 PM                        Good point Mark. Any opinion on that angle?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-22-2016 10:21 PM                     Many parts have been discontinued for the DP-100, not really sure on the NEC. Check with Moving Image Technologies to see what's a go and no go on the NEC. I really feel that the DP-100 is past its end of support life span at this point in time, but there are still quite a few of them out there. I have one customer that has six of them and he buys up other DP-100 just for the parts... There are still a lot of NC-2500's here in Utah. NC-2500's are rats nests inside, but they are extremely reliable. One thing I will mention is you are better off with a projector that does NOT have a pressurized cooling system as is in the early Barco's. Mark  |  IP: Logged Brian DeCiancio Film Handler Posts: 52 From: Warren, OH, USA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 02-23-2016 01:26 AM                        I have several DP-100s now, but no experience with the 2500C. I am trying to determine if it's an "upgrade" to replace a DP-100 with a 2500C (the price is VERY right) or to cannibalize another DP-100 that I have at a different location and replace it with something more appropriately smaller. I have a dead Barco parted out between 3 locations and have a month to get this dilemma figured out. I need something suitable for a drive-in. Again, bottom line, which provides a better image, DP-100 or NEC 2500C?  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 02-23-2016 03:10 AM                     I am not sure there is an answer for your question. Out of the box I believe the 2500 and the DP100 use the same chips and those are D-Cinema projectors, picture quality is pretty consistent between all of them. The issue is that any DP100 or 2500 will now have several thousands/tens of thousands hours on their shoulders and the optics inside will have degraded. It also depends with which lamps they've been run, in what environment and how much maintenance they've had. Expect a drastic drop in light level with an old series 1 - at least with Barco in my experience. I wouldn't bother replacing a DP100 with a 2500 unless the DP100 is completely dead and you had no spare parts left. You say 6000W, I have a feeling that if you bought a brand new machine you could go with a much smaller lamp in a much smaller projector  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-23-2016 06:23 AM                     As to the DP100 support...officially, it is gone now. That said, it share most parts with the DP-3000..which remains supported so you can still get most parts. Whereas I don't have any NC-2500s (and no more DP100s), I cannot comment on their relative support nor have I measured both light outputs. I can say, that I'm happy to be done with DP100 support. Then again, I'm happy that my last NC800C is done too. The companies thought about service more and more with each revision and the older machines just are nasty to service. The points about how many hours are on any series 1 are valid...they are all heading to failure...the more ROHS complaint, the more likely.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 02-23-2016 09:10 AM                     The one big advantage the 2500 has over the DP-100 is that NEC did not use a pressurized cooling system. I hate hate hate pressurized cooling systems! Barco even abandoned them.... If you can locate a Christie CP-2000SB this would probably be the best Series 1 for a drive in. The thing is a light canon! Mark  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 02-23-2016 05:19 PM                     The pressurised system was to allow the projector to be mounted upside down - legacy from non D-Cinema Barco machines. As long as you have coolant inside and the projector is not upside down I believe you do not really need any pressure in the system. That said yes, older Barco coolant lines were mostly a pain.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 02-24-2016 06:18 AM                     I pressurize the series 1 systems on a coolant change but I haven't met one yet that didn't lose its pressure over time with zero consequences. Most ignore the pressure so it isn't really a disadvantage.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.