|
|
Author
|
Topic: GDC TMS with their CLA-2000
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 04-20-2016 12:14 PM
So has anyone here used the GDC CLA-2000 in conjunction with a GDC TMS system to attached their Enterprise Storage Plus?
I've been looking it over and am a little perplexed at what the big benefit it brings so perhaps I'm missing something. It seems like, as compared to merely bringing an eSATA port out on the back of a computer and possibly putting a CRU drive in the computer (if the case style so allows), the CLA creates another user interface and adds a step to loading content.
That is, if you use the CLA, you have to use ITS UI (web) to first transfer content to the storage, then you go into the TMS to use content on the external storage. Whereas, if you have no CLA, you attach your external storage via eSATA (presuming your external storage is something like a RAID5 like the Enterprise Storage or the little box from StarTech and you are done. To load content in, use a program like Ext2IFS to allow Ext2/3 content to attach to the windows computer. Note, even with the CLA, you STILL have to attach a CRU drive and assign it a letter and remember to eject it before removing. So I'm just not getting what it really brings to the table.
Anyone use it? Any opinions?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Ian Freer
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 135
From: Wellington, New Zealand
Registered: Oct 2003
|
posted 04-20-2016 02:45 PM
I haven't tried it but am also interested. I assume that a PC can't access the ESD as I assumed it is running some sort of proprietary interface to work with the SX-3000, and therefore the CLA was just there as a protocol adaptor to enable the ESD to be mapped as a network drive in Windows.
If that's the case then you wouldn't need to use the CLA interface at all, just the TMS interface with the data folder pointed to the mapped network drive.
(Of course there may be nothing proprietary about the PSD/ESD interface, I might have to test that one day, as that would render my assumption above useless)
The only 'advantage' I can see is that in the event one of your attached servers SX-3000 storage devices failed, you can grab the ESD from the TMS and attach it directly to the server, reboot, and you've got all you content available at the server. But that's not likely to be a big advantage for many as it relies on you having SX-3000's...
Also, I believe (but have not tested) there might be an option to effectively live-stream from the TMS to a server, so that would be quicker that the whole 'moving the storage device' method in the event of local storage failure and theoretically include SX-2000AR's in the list of servers to benefit from this feature... I assume there no way this could work for Doremi's based on their inability to play from CRU, and unsure if DSS line can steam from an ftp source...
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|