my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Cropping & Keystone Correction

Author Topic: Cropping & Keystone Correction Jesse Crooks Film Handler Posts: 22 From: Doylestown, PA, United States Registered: Mar 2016 posted 01-08-2017 06:46 PM                    Can anyone tell me what the tolerance threshold is for cropping when configuring lens files? I saw a previous Film-Tech thread that suggested less than 5% was considered acceptable. I tried to check the SMPTE standard that I thought might specify it, but hit their pay wall. We have a fixed-height screen in which the scope image is getting cropped just shy of the sides of the flat pixel array, as indicated by the test pattern. I'd estimate that we're losing a total of about 4% of the full image width. I assume that the screen wasn't wide enough to accommodate the scope image at that height (it's a historic single screen theater) and that cropping it was considered better than letterboxing it. And can anybody explain the options for keystone correction since DCI doesn't allow for software-based solutions? I won't be doing it myself but I'd like to understand it, and more importantly understand what the optimal calibration looks like for a screen with a pretty steep throw. Most of our screens have B-series Barcos, if that matters.  |  IP: Logged Mike Schulz Expert Film Handler Posts: 122 From: Los Angeles, CA Registered: May 2007 posted 01-08-2017 07:37 PM                     If you are playing "Rogue One" or "Moana" right now, check the hard drive for the Disney Digital Framing Charts. They usually include it on all of their feature drives and they are great for doing quick focus and alignment checks. It has a few different colored border bars and it will tell you specifically which ones must be visible and which ones you can crop out if you need to.  |  IP: Logged Leslie Hartmier Expert Film Handler Posts: 100 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Registered: Jul 2012 posted 01-08-2017 08:32 PM                     Depending on what server you have, you might also have framing charts right on your server. For example, GDC includes 'DCI XYZ Framing Chart'. Leslie  |  IP: Logged Justin Hamaker Film God Posts: 2253 From: Lakeport, CA USA Registered: Jan 2004 posted 01-08-2017 09:21 PM                        It's not actually keystone correction. All you are doing is setting the crop position for each corner of the screen. Because each corner has it's own adjustment for the X and Y axis, you can set the crop so it correctly fits your screen. But you are definitely cropping the image rather than changing the shape to fit your screen. As for the cropping, I have three common height screens where the scope picture is cropped anywhere from 25 to <50 pixels on either side. I have never noticed any issue with key elements being cropped. If you're concerned, you might check your side masking to see if there is any kind of adjustment so you can make it a little bit wider or reduce the height by a couple inches.  |  IP: Logged Marco Giustini Film God Posts: 2713 From: Reading, UK Registered: Nov 2007 posted 01-09-2017 04:30 AM                     As mentioned, find a framing chart. On any given format you should be able to see either top/bottom or left/right borders - both would be ideal. If you don't see any of those, then your picture is excessively zoomed and cropped.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-09-2017 11:52 AM                     The problem in the theatre he mentions is not too uncommon. In that, the screen has a motorized masking system (but it would apply to a manual one too). The overall dimensions of the screen are shy of actually 2.39, therefore the sides of the scope image will be cropped if the image fills the height. This site also doesn't close its masking down far enough for 1.85 so on that format the height is cropped. I generally give the customer the option of zero/minimal cropping or fill the screen and without exception, I've been told to fill the screen (because it just looks stupid to have a masked screen and to still not fill it) and amateurish to not mask the screen altogether. DCI spec used to be: quote: 8.3.3.3. Screen Characteristics The screen is required to be non-specular and equally reflective over the entire visible spectrum. The screen is required to have variable black masking, adjustable to tightly frame the projected image. This is required to minimally include 1.85:1 or 2.39:1 image formats. Masking for other formats is optional. As of DCI 1.2, they punted that section and said it was an SMPTE thing. Whereas DCI was thrown about as a condition of obtaining VPFs...SMPTE has NEVER been a regulation body, just an engineering one with the mere power to recommend or codify existing practice. It has never had an enforcement aspect to it.  |  IP: Logged Rick Raskin Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1100 From: Manassas Virginia Registered: Jan 2003 posted 01-09-2017 01:03 PM                     Does any standards body have enforcement powers? In my experience the marketplace is the best enforcer. Make non-compliant equipment and you'll risk sales.  |  IP: Logged Justin Hamaker Film God Posts: 2253 From: Lakeport, CA USA Registered: Jan 2004 posted 01-09-2017 04:08 PM                        I don't think the equipment is the issue; it's theatre being built without masking and/or common width screens. And sloppy installations where the screen files are not properly set to fill the screen. Depending on how much might need to be cropped on the scope picture, I could see shifting the image down slightly so you are on the bottom masking and the fit the picture edge to edge. A couple inches of blank screen at the top of the screen wouldn't be the worst thing - especially if you would have to crop more than 5% to completely fill the screen.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-10-2017 06:04 AM                     I was mistaken, the Flat image is fine but yes, the scope screen isn't wide enough. The screen is also curved (slightly) so you get a geometric element in there, particularly if you undersize it. And leaving dead screen just highlights a misalignment. I would be more inclined to recommend adding a fixed upper masking to slightly lower the top of the image until the effective ratio is an actual 2.39:1  |  IP: Logged Philip Wittlief Film Handler Posts: 57 From: Chicago, IL Registered: May 2003 posted 01-13-2017 03:34 PM                        Along this same topic, is there a calculator/simulator out there for dealing with the curved screen distortions. Looking for what actual screen dimensions will end up with the least cropped picture on curved screens.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 01-13-2017 06:12 PM                     I think Harkness does have a curved screen simulator, actually. Though I think it is geared towards simulating light evenness more than showing cropping. That said you can do it the old fashioned way and do the math or, grab an old Schneider Theatre Design program and put in your screen dimensions and radius and then ignore the focal length (since you will be zooming the lens anyway) and fit the screen and it will let you see about what the barrel distortion will be...even taking into account lens shift and keystone.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.