|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Christie don't recognize Ext2 formated disks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 06-02-2017 12:35 PM
Two things it could be.
1 - The partition table is GPT, not MBR (MS-DOS).
2 - There is an EFI partition, a crapware partition (often found on some USB sticks and drives sold in Office Depot type places), or something other than the content partition, on the start of the drive.
In my experience, a DSS200 with a recent software version can tolerate a GPT partition table as long as there isn't a non-content partition on the start of the drive, but will not see the content partition if both problems are present on the drive. The Doremi DCP2000 won't read drives with a GPT partition table at all. One of the few positive things I have to say about the Barco Alchemy is that it does seem to be capable of scanning a drive and finding DCP content wherever it is and however the drive is configured, with the sole exception of exFAT partitions, which it can't read.
I don't have any experience working with Christie servers or ICMPs, so can't give you any specific pointers - sorry.
If I were faced with this problem, I'd hook it to a PC running Ubuntu with hfsprogs and GPartEd added to it (if you don't have one, download an Ubuntu live ISO, burn it to a disc or stick, and boot from it). GPartEd will show you how the drive is configured. Whatever the issue is, you should then be able to copy the DCP files from it to a drive that your server can read, or FTP them straight into the DCP server if the computer you're using is on the same LAN as the server.
IMHO, a Linux PC with GPartEd and the plugins needed to read HFS+ and exFAT added, running on the same LAN as the DCP server, is an essential tool for any projection booth that plays anything other than routine, Deluxe Technicolor DCPs (i.e. ones made by professional post houses that know what the ISDCF rules are, and how to obey them). The bottom line is that if a drive is not 100% compliant, any given DCP server or ICMP may or may not read it, and you need a plan B if it won't.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carsten Kurz
Film God
Posts: 4340
From: Cologne, NRW, Germany
Registered: Aug 2009
|
posted 06-06-2017 10:35 AM
The Christie IMS has both local USB and eSATA ingest ports. Did they try both with the same disc (REALLY???)? Maybe the problem is not with the formatting, but the interface. Yet it could still work with the Barco.
What's weird is this (from the Christie IMB-S2 manual): 'Ingest drives can contain Microsoft Windows (FAT, FAT-32, NTFS) or Linux (ext3, ext4) file systems.'
But that manual is three years old, and I am sure this was never meant to actually exclude ext2, it is more like a typo... It would be completely braindamaged to actively support ext4 on ingest drives, but exclude ext2, back then, and now...
- Carsten
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 06-07-2017 11:05 AM
Correct that the DCI specification does not address disk formats. There is an ISDCF document about this, though. The web link is here
http://isdcf.com/papers/ISDCF-Doc3-Disk-Drive-Recs-2015-07-21-Clean.pdf
It is giving me a 404 not found error right now.
The short version is that it specifies MBR partition table and ext2 or ext3 filesystem with an inode size of 128 bytes.
I still don't see why anything would accept ext3, but not ext2. In the context of a read-only mount, the two are esseentially identical, and ext3 provides no advantages. ext4 is a significantly different filesystem, however.
Most, if not all, servers will read NTFS, but it is not an open standard and not a common format for DCPs. Some newer servers will read HFS+, but that is rare and I would discourage anyone from distributing a DCP on an HFS+ filesystem. I have yet to find anything that will read exFAT natively.
Did we ever rule out "advanced format"/GPT as the original problem here?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|