|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Author
|
Topic: Contrast issues nec3240s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paul H. Rayton
Expert Film Handler
Posts: 210
From: Los Angeles, CA , USA
Registered: Aug 2003
|
posted 06-03-2018 06:38 PM
NEC definitely does have an iris for their 3240 projector. Accessing the location of said iris is a bit of a project, however. In the case of the 3240 projector, it's necessary to get in by disconnecting some of the rubber coolant piping, and moving away (but not removing) the coolant reservoir. Difficult, but not impossible - but you wouldn't want to do it very often.
So the iris attachment is a very valid approach for improving your contrast, plus it will also drop your screen brightness somewhat, possibly 3 or 4FL, depending some variables. That seems to be good side-benefit for you since you indicate that you're already having difficulties getting screen illumination below 20FL.
We successfully used a similar iris in the NEC model 2500 and it was very good for the image. Sadly, as the optical system aged, the system gradually lost efficiency. After about 6 years we mostly had to leave the iris out because we were having trouble hitting 16FL. That being said, it's also generally accepted that 2K DLP chips have better native contrast than 4K DLP chips, so while it's not practical in your case, you could also achieve a slight contrast improvement going to a 2K projector.
And finally -- those light-colored walls are absolute killers for screen contrast. That's been known for decades, of course, and that's why contemporary high-end cinemas are specified to have dark (or black) walls and ceilings. (The "black box" concept.) I once worked in a cinema that did a refurbishing, including painting the walls and ceiling black, and was astounded by the resulting difference in image quality.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Leo Enticknap
Film God
Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000
|
posted 06-04-2018 12:31 AM
Thanks, Paul. Literally, about the only truly good, "no strings attached" comment I have about the Series 1 NEC compared to the Series 2, is that inserting and removing the iris/depth of field booster plate is so much easier and simpler. The contrast ratio of the 2500 at the Egyptian with the iris in place really looked nice. I remember early one morning watching a Warners' DCP of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre on it shortly after I started working there in 2014: I'd only intended to look at the first ten minutes or so, because our programmer was worried about what it was like. In the event, the sharpness, contrast and gamma struck me as being almost as good as a nitrate print (and certainly better than many of the several 35mm safety prints I'd seen projected), and so I made myself comfortable in the balcony, and watched the whole thing. I'm ashamed to say that this was probably the last time I watched a movie in a movie theater from start to end.
On the 3240 you've got to go in behind the cooling system reservoir to insert and remove the iris, with the result that it's generally considered not worth the hassle, even during 2-D / 3-D conversions. At the Aero it's a Hobson's choice: if you have the iris permanently in, a 4K bulb is perfect for 2-D, but a 3K bulb isn't, and 7K isn't quite bright enough for Dolby 3-D. Without it, a 3K bulb will do (just) for 2-D and a 6.5K will work for 3-D, but the contrast ratio really takes a hit.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1 2
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|