Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Digital Cinema Forum   » Dolby DSL200 uses 8TB hard disk

   
Author Topic: Dolby DSL200 uses 8TB hard disk
Tacky Ting
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: Hong Kong / China
Registered: Jan 2015


 - posted 10-03-2018 06:35 AM      Profile for Tacky Ting   Author's Homepage   Email Tacky Ting   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hello, everyone
Have you ever tried to replace the Dolby DSL200 with 8 Toshiba Enterprise 8TB MG05ACA800E SATA3 /128MB HDD?

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Macaulay
Film God

Posts: 2321
From: Toronto, Canada
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 10-03-2018 06:53 AM      Profile for Dave Macaulay   Email Dave Macaulay   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, no.
There may be 8 drive bays but I think only 4 have drive connections, the rest are unusable.
8TB drives may work, I don't know. They are not tested or approved. Let us know.
Why do you need that much storage?

 |  IP: Logged

Ioannis Syrogiannis
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 147
From: Reykjavík, Iceland
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 10-03-2018 07:01 AM      Profile for Ioannis Syrogiannis   Email Ioannis Syrogiannis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dave, I think that the DSL libraries (as opposed to DSS) have the connectivity for 8 drives.

Tacky, even though dolby did qualified a number of the Toshiba MG04ACA series HDDs, the MG05ACA seems to be a series that support 8TB.
If I was to experiment, I would probably play it safe and go for the 5TB MG04ACA series (MG04ACA500E).
But, then again, I am not so much of an experiment-driven guy... so I 'll wait for your feedback.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-03-2018 10:32 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
You can swap the raid card out for a model 9650SE-8LPML which will permit all 8 bays to work.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-03-2018 02:23 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why would you want to put around 50TB of storage capacity in a DSS200 (8 x 8TB drives in a RAID5 configuration)? OK, a DSS200 can be used as a mini TMS for, if memory serves me correctly, three or four screen servers, but even that wouldn't need anything approaching that capacity. The biggest TMS I've ever encountered had 24TB of usable capacity, and that was in a unique situation (a post house that had to deal with a huge amount of content).

In 2014, I followed Brad's suggestion and installed the 8-port 3Ware RAID card plus 8 x 2TB drives into one, but in those days the cost of bigger drives was such that this was the most cost effective way to buy 13TB of usable capacity; and the big festivals we were doing, some of them back-to-back, meant that we needed that. Not any more, though: if I were in the same situation now, I'd use 4 x 4TB.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Renlund
Film Handler

Posts: 71
From: San Francisco
Registered: Feb 2008


 - posted 10-03-2018 03:35 PM      Profile for Mike Renlund   Email Mike Renlund   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
FYI, you cannot make a partition larger than 16TB on DSS servers. The Linux OS that was used does not support anything bigger than that.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-03-2018 07:33 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Note, the OP did state DSL200 so it should have the necessary RAID already. It will configure as RAID6 though. I believe you can load all 8 bays to take advantage of the storage but the UI will only show the first 6.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Renlund
Film Handler

Posts: 71
From: San Francisco
Registered: Feb 2008


 - posted 10-03-2018 08:11 PM      Profile for Mike Renlund   Email Mike Renlund   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My apologies. DSS or DSL devices cannot exceed 16TB for the partition size. It is the same Linux kernel on both devices.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-03-2018 08:29 PM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't notice the L, either - sorry.

From what I can see looking inside them, the differences between the DSS200 and the DSL200 are that the DSL has a different model of RAID card (3Ware 9750-8i, which has a backup battery on it) and no cat862 media block in it: otherwise, they're the same machine.

If you use the optional SAS card on a DSL200, you can boost the total space available beyond 16TB, but only because you're then using two separate filesystems (the onboard content RAID and the external one).

Still, 50TB on a single TMS? I suppose if you're running a 30-plex, with all the screens playing 3-hour long, 4K, HFR features, you'd be approaching that sort of capacity requirement, but not unless.

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 10-03-2018 09:37 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
You'd be surprised at how quickly TMS space gets used up when you deal with 2D, 3D, 6fl 3D, Laser 3D, Atmos, Auro, DTS-X, Dolby Vision, and IMAX.

And then add in the 17,238 trailers for [pick a tentpole] with a different version of each of those trailers for every 3D and "PLF" format out there, plus some chains get preferential branding and those get sent out to everyone.

If you have DCDC, you can expect today to have this week's titles, next week's titles, and later tonight they'll start to delivery the following week's titles.

Sometimes you get both Interop and SMPTE versions of a title, and you can't delete one because who know what keys they'll send next week.

Don't get me started on special events, promo screenings, or classic film series!

 |  IP: Logged

Ioannis Syrogiannis
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 147
From: Reykjavík, Iceland
Registered: Jun 2005


 - posted 10-04-2018 03:36 PM      Profile for Ioannis Syrogiannis   Email Ioannis Syrogiannis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Renlund
DSS or DSL devices cannot exceed 16TB for the partition size. It is the same Linux kernel on both devices.
Could that be arranged if the page size could be set during creating the XFS partition?

In any case, that's nice to know and I 'd be happy to see dolby pointing the limitation fact on the "dolby cinema server qualified hard drive list" under DSL200, so that no-one gets to use bigger than 3TB ones for 8 disk RAID arrays, since that would be of no use.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Renlund
Film Handler

Posts: 71
From: San Francisco
Registered: Feb 2008


 - posted 10-04-2018 03:54 PM      Profile for Mike Renlund   Email Mike Renlund   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Ioannis, it is a great idea to add that piece of information to the Hard Drive list. It applies to both any DSS or DSL and so I have placed it in a more general location, but changed the color so that it jumps out at you. I've uploaded the new version to www.dolbycustomer.com.

 |  IP: Logged

Tacky Ting
Film Handler

Posts: 18
From: Hong Kong / China
Registered: Jan 2015


 - posted 10-05-2018 05:21 AM      Profile for Tacky Ting   Author's Homepage   Email Tacky Ting   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does max 16TB for the partition size, including the two Barkup Hard disk capacities of RAID 6?
I use 6 X 4TB Toshiba MG04ACA400E , can I?

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 10-05-2018 05:32 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know for sure - Mike or someone would have to advise - but my guess would be yes. The RAID6 redundancy is handled by the RAID card in hardware, and the limitation we're talking about is in the Linux filesystem. The operating system therefore "sees" the RAID as a single volume, of whatever capacity the RAID controller reports it to be to the operating system, up to 16TB. So if you put 6 x 4TB drives in, giving you 24TB of raw capacity, that will come down to around 16 if they are configured as a RAID6 volume. The RAID card will tell the operating system that it has a 16TB volume attached, and you should - in theory - be all set.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-05-2018 07:17 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm reasonably certain that you can load six 4TB drives in a DSL200 and get a 16TB RAID 6 system (and it won't be 16TB due to the RAID).

I have one 3-plex that does subrun and they have all three servers with 4TB drives so they have essentially 36TB for the complex to harvest up to 15-weeks of movies and previews from DCDC such that they have the content when it makes it to subrun. Often, they don't know what they are going to run 15-weeks in advance so it is easier to get everything and dump what you don't need once you know what you are going to book. Having that large capacity makes it easier.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.