Author
|
Topic: Ground Loops With Ultra Stereo J-200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 02-02-2019 10:36 AM
quote: Gordon McLeod Also the JS200 was a mono processor that could be upgraded
I would say that is a mischaracterization. The JS200 series were configured as desired at the time of order. Mono only was an option and was upgradable to various forms of stereo. But one did not necessarily order it a monitor and then order upgrade cards.
Technically, the CP55/CP65 would be mono processors by the same logic because there were "M" versions.
I believe the "stereo" companies chose that name due to Dolby using "Dolby Stereo" to mean any cinema sound system they put their name on. As I understand it Dolby dropped the name "stereo" because there some that thought it was too "'70s" sounding (e.g. archaic).
But you had Eprad Stereo Ultra Stereo, Kintek Stereo (though they started as a psudostereo company and even SMART Stereo.
Bruce brings up an excellent point of about ground loops. They exist, even if you can't hear them like in an analog system and they are just as bad. A ground "loop" implies that ground is at different potential (and not ground somewhere or everywhere in the system).
The real solution is to fix the grounding problem, which wouldn't exist if grounding was carefully designed and everything attached plays by the rules (no current flow on ground). Remember, if there is ANY current flow on the ground conductor, that conductor is no longer at ground potential (can't get around Ohm's Law).
The fast solution, that most take, with audio is to float one end of an unbalanced system. This works on lower frequencies, as dealt with audio but doesn't work well on higher frequencies as used in video. A solution there is to apply a capacitor to remove the direct coupling but allow higher frequency noise to still drain to its "nearest" ground. Transformers can also be your friend, if they are high enough quality to not adversely affect your signal and can withstand the power applied.
Note, "balanced" is not necessarily the key to noise free. Balanced implies that one has a signal that equally modulates above and below a reference (e.g. ground). The key to it is the differential signal that has a very high CMRR (common mode rejection ratio) since noise/interference that hits the cable during its length will likely hit both leads equally and will sum to zero.
One can use a transformer and remove the ground reference and still achieve a differential input and not, technically, be balanced as it is not balanced to a reference.
Rane Note 110 is a good reference:
https://www.rane.com/note110.html
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|