Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets   » Top Gun (request)

   
Author Topic: Top Gun (request)
Michael Coate
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1904
From: Los Angeles, California
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 01-13-2003 12:36 PM      Profile for Michael Coate   Email Michael Coate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Requesting print specs for Top Gun (1986; Paramount)

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-13-2003 02:58 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
35mm was scope 2.35 Dolby A on 6 reels

70mm was 2.21 Dolby A 6 track magnetic on 6 reels

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 10-09-2004 01:58 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 634 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

John Carpenter
Film Handler

Posts: 96
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 10-09-2004 01:58 PM      Profile for John Carpenter   Email John Carpenter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Top Gun – 35mm (1986):
*6 reels
*Paramount
*ETS (print from Dallas Depot)
*Dolby A
*Scope
*110 mins

Print # 7010: No missing footage, film did have a 3-4 second color defect in reel #6. Printed in August 2003.

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 04-21-2009 07:55 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 1655 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-21-2009 07:55 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
DFS#7010 is still in good shape, still 2003-datecoded polyester (2383). It was living in Seattle, it'll presumably live in Boston after this week.

It's missing a bit at the reel ends, though, most reels are cut within 3 frames of the original changeover cue. (It has been Phare cued with a white cue at six seconds after the motor cue.)

Footage counts:
REEL 1: 1956'08F (TOP GUN title at 83'14F)
REEL 2: 1559'06F (2nd scene at 07'4F)
REEL 3: 1838'12F (2nd scene at 04'1F)
REEL 4: 1640'09F (2nd scene at 35'8F)
REEL 5: 1903'12F (2nd scene at 10'1F)
REEL 6: 0963'09F (2nd scene at 04'3F; cut to unframed black at 931'4F)

2nd scene numbers are there since I can't tell how much was lost off the head leaders. Footage counts assume 20 frames after the lab changeover cue.

There are two splices in the print proper, both in reel 6.
One is adjacent the safelight fogging that John C. referred to, which begins at 441'6F until the splice at 443'1F, which was presumably a lab splice someone removed (It's really too bad the first theatre didn't reject this reel when the print was new. I mean, lab splices and safelight fogging are one thing on a run-of-the-mill release print, but they shouldn't be tolerated on a reprint of a popular repertory title).

There's also another splice at 568'10F, not clear why, but nothing notable is missing (this is during the credits).

Sound negs are dated 5-15-2000, which seems weird to me. Why would they be Dolby A then [but they are; despite someone having labelled the R6 tail (platter label) "SR"].

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 04-21-2009 08:52 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why assume 20 frames after the c/o cue? It's normally either 18 or 24. [Confused]

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 04-21-2009 08:56 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Honestly, I couldn't remember (and, I suppose, was too lazy to try to dig up what it was for 1986; and I'm not sure who the lab was). I thought it was 24 frames if you count from the first cue, or 20 frames after. By all means subtract two frames if you like. [Eek!]

Oh yeah, almost forgot:
The New York Times, Sunday, May 11, 1986 (the sunday before; other ads during the week feature a free sneak preview with poster giveaways, and the Friday ad replaces "The Best of the Best" with "Two Hours of Pure Pow" (people magazine)):
 -

--jhawk

[ 04-22-2009, 02:07 AM: Message edited by: John Hawkinson ]

 |  IP: Logged

System Notices
Forum Watchdog / Soup Nazi

Posts: 215

Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 07-25-2018 05:17 PM      Profile for System Notices         Edit/Delete Post 

It has been 3381 days since the last post.


 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 07-25-2018 05:17 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone know the credit offset of the DCP for Top Gun?

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-25-2018 06:30 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
I have 1:44:30 for the 2012 version, but the "current" file is from 2013 and is 9 seconds shorter.

 |  IP: Logged

Justin Hamaker
Film God

Posts: 2253
From: Lakeport, CA USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 07-25-2018 06:38 PM      Profile for Justin Hamaker   Author's Homepage   Email Justin Hamaker   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Adam

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.