|
|
Author
|
Topic: Top Gun (request)
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Hawkinson
Film God
Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 04-21-2009 07:55 PM
DFS#7010 is still in good shape, still 2003-datecoded polyester (2383). It was living in Seattle, it'll presumably live in Boston after this week.
It's missing a bit at the reel ends, though, most reels are cut within 3 frames of the original changeover cue. (It has been Phare cued with a white cue at six seconds after the motor cue.)
Footage counts: REEL 1: 1956'08F (TOP GUN title at 83'14F) REEL 2: 1559'06F (2nd scene at 07'4F) REEL 3: 1838'12F (2nd scene at 04'1F) REEL 4: 1640'09F (2nd scene at 35'8F) REEL 5: 1903'12F (2nd scene at 10'1F) REEL 6: 0963'09F (2nd scene at 04'3F; cut to unframed black at 931'4F)
2nd scene numbers are there since I can't tell how much was lost off the head leaders. Footage counts assume 20 frames after the lab changeover cue.
There are two splices in the print proper, both in reel 6. One is adjacent the safelight fogging that John C. referred to, which begins at 441'6F until the splice at 443'1F, which was presumably a lab splice someone removed (It's really too bad the first theatre didn't reject this reel when the print was new. I mean, lab splices and safelight fogging are one thing on a run-of-the-mill release print, but they shouldn't be tolerated on a reprint of a popular repertory title).
There's also another splice at 568'10F, not clear why, but nothing notable is missing (this is during the credits).
Sound negs are dated 5-15-2000, which seems weird to me. Why would they be Dolby A then [but they are; despite someone having labelled the R6 tail (platter label) "SR"].
--jhawk
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
John Hawkinson
Film God
Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 04-21-2009 08:56 PM
Honestly, I couldn't remember (and, I suppose, was too lazy to try to dig up what it was for 1986; and I'm not sure who the lab was). I thought it was 24 frames if you count from the first cue, or 20 frames after. By all means subtract two frames if you like.
Oh yeah, almost forgot: The New York Times, Sunday, May 11, 1986 (the sunday before; other ads during the week feature a free sneak preview with poster giveaways, and the Friday ad replaces "The Best of the Best" with "Two Hours of Pure Pow" (people magazine)):
--jhawk [ 04-22-2009, 02:07 AM: Message edited by: John Hawkinson ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|