Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets   » Amores Perros (2000)

   
Author Topic: Amores Perros (2000)
John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-14-2004 10:07 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Amores Perros" (2000)
aka "Love's a Bitch"
8 Reels
Flat (see below *)
Dolby SR/SRD
US release by Lions Gate Films
Non-theatrical distribution by New Yorker Films
2/24/01 and 2/28/01 soundtrack neg and picture neg dates.
non-Kodak non-Fuji filmstock; edgecode "00OD" (zero zero oh dee)
Laser-etched subtitles (unfortunately some white-on-white)
Looks kinda like Tech. lab, but maybe not? (not labelled)

* We have some debate locally as to the correct aspect ratio. Tao Yue believes it should be 1.85:1, and points out that that is the ratio seen on the DVD, and there is no information to the contrary, and that the film is supposed to be visually crowded. I began watching it in 1.66:1 and we switched to 1.37:1 after R1 because a lot of elements were being cut off in 1.66:1, including significant chunks of people's heads. If anyone knows authoritatively, it would be nice to know. The subtitles are framed for 1.85:1 presentation, also.

 |  IP: Logged

Tao Yue
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 209
From: Princeton, NJ
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 03-24-2004 05:17 PM      Profile for Tao Yue   Author's Homepage   Email Tao Yue   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wrote to Rodrigo Prieto, the cinematographer on Amores Perros, and received the following response (posted with his permission):

quote:

Dear Tao:
Thanks for your interest and insistence on preserving the artistic
integrity of the intention of the framing in Amores Perros. You are
correct, the aspect ratio was 1:85. It would be very sad for me that
anyone would see it projected at Academy Full Aperture since there
framing was very important to the story telling. Even though the
camera is hand held and mobile, great thought and energy was put into
the proper framing (at 1:85). Again, thanks for caring, and I hope
that I helped settle the issue. Good luck!
Rodrigo Prieto, ASC, AMC.

Michael Coate, Paul Linfesty, and Steve Kraus would probably find a sense of deja vu in this. cf. the last time jhawk raised a giant fuss over the same subject (opening up open-matte films):

http://www.film-tech.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=12;t=000025#000000

This should settle any discussion over aspect ratio. Anything else should go in Yak.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.