|
|
Home
Products
Store
Forum
Warehouse
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
Author
|
Topic: The Passenger (1975)
|
John Hawkinson
Film God
Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002
|
posted 04-15-2007 12:13 AM
"The Passenger" (1975) aka "Professione: reporter" (original Italian title) aka "The Passenger (Reporter)" (some leaders) 2005 reissue 7 reels 1.85:1 Flat (hard matte) Mono (conventional silver-applicated track) Primarily in English, with occasional local languages No subtitles MGM Sony DFS depot Kodak Color VISION 2383 stock FotoKem lab [*]
Soundtrack leaders variously note "--SONY-- A.N.T. version," "Restored Director's version 9/9/05," and combinations.
There's a huge amount aperture dirt and hair just outside the 1.85:1 area that I do not understand; occasionally it makes it into the 1.85:1 frame. It is positive (black) that varies from camera cut to camera cut, so I don't understand (originated on reversal stock? That seems unlikely!). Workprints used for the IP??
(If they're going to "restore" the soundtrack, why not make it SR/Woody Allen mono? Ah, well...)
=== Print-specific info Print #0036 (DFS) Booked through New York Films (circuiting a "former DFS print") 2005 datecode. Print quality Fair/Good (6-7), R1 has some scratches and dirt, but most is decent. Kind of beat up for a 2-year old movie that probably doesn't get a huge number of plays, though. Scribed cues at somewhat irregular positions (motor cue ranges from 10'3f to 12'10f, etc.), no visible lab cues (short tails?).
[*] What lab is it that uses those 4"x5/16" white labels, dot-matrix printing, with the title in a larger font on the first line and "35mm Composite Release Print PT-3" (e.g. for reel 3)? Is that FotoKem?. answer: Yeah, at least I have a short FotoKem printed for me with those stickers.
[edit: update lab] [ 04-15-2007, 05:42 PM: Message edited by: John Hawkinson ]
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|
|
|
|