my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets   » Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1 (2010)

Author Topic: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 1 (2010) John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-15-2010 04:17 PM                     DCI 2048 x 858 2.39:1 91GB Full run time: 2:28:18 Credits offset: 2:14:38 (Unverified) ------- 35mm Scope 8 Reels SRD/DTS/SDDS Man, those are some long credits!  |  IP: Logged John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-17-2010 03:20 PM                     DCI Correction to total running time (Incorrect on hard drive label) and credits offset verification. Full run time: 2:25:53 Credits offset: 2:14:38 (Verified) Rolling credits start: 2:17:57  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 11-18-2010 04:23 AM                     yea, almost 10 minutes worth .. almost breaking the end credit record of "2001:a space odyssey"  |  IP: Logged Per Hauberg Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 883 From: Malling, Denmark Registered: Jul 2000 posted 11-18-2010 08:00 AM                        ...and with the difference, that by "2001", people stayed to get all that wonderful music...  |  IP: Logged Jonathan Smith Expert Film Handler Posts: 201 From: Youngstown, OH Registered: Jan 2010 posted 11-18-2010 04:30 PM                     John: In your experience, would those values for the start of the rolling credits be roughly correct for 35mm as well, or are there slight differences between it and DCI?  |  IP: Logged John Wilson Film God Posts: 5438 From: Sydney, Australia. Registered: Dec 1999 posted 12-20-2010 05:40 AM                     I believe in this case they are identical, Jonathan.  |  IP: Logged Michael Brown Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1522 From: Bradford, England Registered: May 2001 posted 01-02-2011 06:44 PM                     In every case shouldn't they be completely identical?  |  IP: Logged Chris Slycord Film God Posts: 2986 From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea Registered: Mar 2007 posted 01-02-2011 07:46 PM                     quote: Michael Brown In every case shouldn't they be completely identical? Not necessarily. [off-topic]Like they screwed it up in "Jackass 3D" by making 2D prints and leaving a couple minute thing in there talking about how you need the 3D glasses. If they'd made it properly, the few 35mm prints would've had a slightly different offset for the credits.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.