Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Scary Movie (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Scary Movie
Scott D. Neff
Theatre Dork

Posts: 919
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 06-21-2000 06:12 PM      Profile for Scott D. Neff   Author's Homepage   Email Scott D. Neff   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While I was expecting this movie to be your usual series of bad parodies of movies featuring a whole heck of a lot of bathroom jokes, it was ACTUALLY very very funny.

Our film buyer - who hates most movies - actually laughed until she hurt.

There of course WAS a lot of bathroom humor - but there was also a lot of unexpected more abstract humor.

Definitely worth seeing if you like senseless comedy.

------------------
Scott D. Neff
----------------
www.cinema-west.com

 |  IP: Logged

Tyler Skinner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 115
From: Pa
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 06-21-2000 11:23 PM      Profile for Tyler Skinner   Email Tyler Skinner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
cool, I can't wait to see it 3 WEEKS FROM NOW!

tyler.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-07-2000 04:05 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Senseless comedy? Yup, that's mostly what it was. Granted there were some parts that were extremely funny, but the majority of the flick (85%) was completely stupid and incredibly un-funny to me.

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-07-2000 04:29 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here it is, and almost a year late. I guess they had to hold it back so they could make a quick reference to 'Big Moma's House'.

I thought the movie was funny in quite a few parts, and dumb in others. They tried to do gross-out humor, but didn't pull it off. The gross out scenes were just kind of annoying. I'm actually surprised to see what they got away with in this movie.

I was in the mood for a stupid-ass movie, and this fit the bill, although I would NEVER pay for anything like this. It's kind of hard paroding a parody, though, as the original SCREAM was a parody of horror flicks.

I did enjoy the scene inside the movie auditorium, and how everyone gets their revenge on the annoying patron. That should be clipped out and shown on the front of all movies so that people get the point. Cut out the stupid scene in the theater bathroom, though.

 |  IP: Logged

Dwayne Caldwell
Master Film Handler

Posts: 323
From: Rockwall, TX, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 07-07-2000 12:29 PM      Profile for Dwayne Caldwell   Email Dwayne Caldwell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, that patron stabbing scene would definitely make a nice courtesy policy. It'd beat having Mr. Clip crashing into a bunch of film cans in the dark then shushing everyone, that's for damn sure.

I'm also amazed at the shit they got away with in this movie. Even Orgazmo didn't have this many dicks. And that sperm geyser!? I'd have thought the MPAA would cry bloody murder over that one. I'm sure that scene will gross people out more than elicit a chuckle. But with people nowadays, you never know.

I do have to admit, though that there were some pretty damn funny scenes. I'm about to cite examples so if you don't what anything SPOILED for you, stop reading.

Okay. For instance, the movie stabbing scene for one. And when Greg is beating the holy hell out of Cindy. I also had to laugh at the Amistad 2 trailer and the flashback scene where they were driving and Greg gets hit with a barrage of branches, gets a honeycomb stuck on his head, and forces Cindy to go down deeper onto Billy. And there were a few others. But just about everything else is stupid. Doofy was just annoying.

Anyway, I'm glad I got paid to watch the movie rather than the other way around or I'd have been pissed.

------------------
The man with the magic hands.

 |  IP: Logged

Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 07-08-2000 03:14 PM      Profile for Evans A Criswell   Author's Homepage   Email Evans A Criswell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I too loved the movie theatre scene, and think that it, or a modification of it would make a great policy trailer. It would definitely be much better than that horrid "Little Girl With The Man Voice" Pepsi ad/policy trailer that Regal started using about a month ago. I'm already hearing "Oh no, not this again" from people in Regal theatres when that thing comes on.

Anyway, back to "Scary Movie". I was amazed that the bathroom "penis" scene and the "sperm geyser" scenes made it into the movie, since such scenes generally cause an NC-17 rating. I saw this movie in a nearly packed auditorium and the "sperm geyser" scene caused continuous laughter from the audience for at least 30 seconds. It got the biggest laugh of anything in the movie, although the audience reacted and laughed a lot (at least once every minute or two).

The movie exceeded my "funniness" expectations. If you just want to put your brain in neutral and have a lot to laught at, this movie is highly recommended. I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be the number one movie this weekend. The theatre I visited in Decatur, AL was more busy than I'd seen it in a long time, and "Scary Movie" was the only new movie it had received in a few weeks. It was being run in two auditoriums.


Another observation that impressed me: in the movie theatre scene, when the screen was first displayed, and "Shakespeare in Love" was going to be the move, the screen was setup for flat, and I said to myself, and my friend, "I thought that was a scope film." When the actual movie scenes were shown, the screen shown in the scene was "scope" ratio. I was impressed that they got it right.


 |  IP: Logged

Ethan Harper
E-dawggg!!!

Posts: 325
From: Plano, TX, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 07-09-2000 04:37 PM      Profile for Ethan Harper   Email Ethan Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I actually really enjoyed this one. Then again i always love a good brainless comedy. oh yeah i also love parody's. i thought it was cool and the ending was cool the whole usual suspects thing. though for some reason i had a feeling it would end like that. but it was still funny.

i could of done without the penis jokes though. i found it just a little disturbing to see one mans penis enter into to one ear and exit through the other in ammends to kill a person. but oh well it has to be done.

but i though the sex scene was hilarious. and how he used a chainsaw to shave her bush that was great. And the "old faithful" sperm geyser. One of the only things that annoyed me was that scene where he is killing that one girl while she is making all these sarcastic remarks. and it continues while she was decapitated.

"wwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaassssssssuuuuuuuuuupppppppp"

i dont know in all words i thought it was great and enjoyed it.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott McFly
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: Birch Run, MI, USA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 08-02-2000 10:24 AM      Profile for Scott McFly   Email Scott McFly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i really hated this movie. i cant stand movies that a 13 year old could have made. it contains the most mindless crotch humor and potty jokes ive ever seen. i enjoy movies like clerks, and south park the movie, but scary movie was just flat out a waste of good film. and you know what really makes me upset? ive seen so many parents take their kids (im talking like 5 yrs age range here) into this movie. and then people wonder why their kids grow up to be rapists or murderers. taking your kids to see movies like this one is not only innapropriate but it is like the parents are condoning the kind of behavior shown on the screen, especially when there is a theater full of people and the 5 yr old sees everyone laughin when someone dies by having a penis thrusted in one ear and out the other. this is by far the worst movie ive ever seen, worse than bats, and even worse than eye of the beholder.

 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-04-2000 02:23 AM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh my God!!

Scott! You were right!

The five year olds are carrying concealed penises and slaughtering everyone in sight! Oh the humanity!!

Actually, the blame lies not with the film makers, but soley with the parents who ignored the big, fat "R" that was printed in the theatre's ad for this movie. Hellooooo!!?

The biggest pit-fall of any critic is when he crosses the line between reviewing a movie and telling the film maker how to do his job.

I hated "Scary Movie" too. The press releases and the "big, fat *R* rating" pretty much clued me in to the fact that my son should watch "Pokemon" instead.

As a child, did you sneak into "Porky's" because you weren't old enough to see it? (I did!).

We can enforce the rating system (we do). We can supply info on the general content of a film (we do).

If a parent takes their child to a movie, we do not have the authority to second guess them.

The responsibility of raising children resides with the parents.

While they might just be morons, any further attempts would violate hard earned rights that people have, at some point in history, died to defend.

Living in a society where freedom of speech is allowed does not empower parents to be "brain dead" while the rating system protects them. Indeed, it makes it necessary for them to do their jobs (being a parent).

If a movie sucks, then say it sucks. Don't change it. Let the review (indeed, the film) speak for itself.

Russ


 |  IP: Logged

Scott McFly
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: Birch Run, MI, USA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 08-04-2000 02:34 AM      Profile for Scott McFly   Email Scott McFly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
yo russ, i didnt say its the film makers fault the kids see the crap and its burned into their impressionable little minds that its funny, it is the parents fault, thats what i was saying, too many parents condone things like watching scary movie, then they wonder why kids shoot other kids for example. im just saying, the wayans brothers did what they thought would make money and be funny, they were only half right in my opinion but wouldnt you agree this movie needed nc-17 rating? i havent even seen that many penises in a porno. and believe me, i enforce the rating rule as much as i can, nothing makes me happier at work than to catch some little kids sneakin into movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Russ Kress
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 202
From: Charleston, WV, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-04-2000 11:46 PM      Profile for Russ Kress   Author's Homepage   Email Russ Kress   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I saw the "little guy" poke through the hole in the stall wall in the bathroom scene and really wondered that myself. Didn't "Basic Instinct" initially receive an "NC-17" because of a full frontal nude shot of Michael Douglas that was later removed?

Maybe real ones aren't allowed, but life like prostetics are!?

Maybe we can get some of the folks that assign ratings to post here someday! *Grin*

Russ

 |  IP: Logged

Scott McFly
Film Handler

Posts: 19
From: Birch Run, MI, USA
Registered: Aug 2000


 - posted 08-05-2000 08:24 AM      Profile for Scott McFly   Email Scott McFly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
oh dear, michael douglas naked? ida gave that an nc-17 too! no one needs to see that!

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-06-2000 05:21 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Who's Ida? She one of those old gals on the censorship board?

 |  IP: Logged

Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 08-06-2000 08:56 PM      Profile for Evans A Criswell   Author's Homepage   Email Evans A Criswell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just watched "Scary Movie" again tonight because I wanted to see it one last time before it left the theatres here. (We have no second run theatre anymore). It is amazing how many details and jokes there are to notice in that movie. There are many funny details in backgrounds of scenes and I notice something different every time I see the movie. I can't wait for the DVD on this one so I can still-frame it and examine backgrounds carefully.

In the cafeteria scene, there is one sign I have not been able to read. One the black signs with white stick-on letters, above the food lines, the left sign reads "Same old Sh*t". The one on the right reads "(something) same old". I haven't been able to make out what the "(something)" is. It looked like "wide" but since the camera was not focused on it, it was slightly too blurry to read. Has anyone else been able to read it? I'm sure it will not be legible on the DVD.

The beer ad on the wall of the principal's office was a nice touch. I noticed that one for the first time tonight.

A couple of jokes were ruined in the movie tonight since it was shown at 1.85:1 . For example, the 25 1/2 finger joke didn't work because one hand was off the screen. The penis through the hole in the stall joke almost didn't work because the penis barely entered the screen. C'mon Regal, put in adjustable top masking, longer focal length lenses for scope, and file those aperture plates out to the right width!

A couple brought a baby into this movie!

Evans



 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-01-2000 04:28 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad...85%? Methinks you are WAY too generous.

There are some films that can get away with gross out gags because they are few enough to still be funny (see: There's Something About Mary) and are outweighed by some real humour.

Scary Movie is not one of them.

The Wayan brothers have had a script meeting and it went along the lines of "How can we make our movie funny?" "How about we just out-gross every other movie ever made?" "Good idea."

It wasn't.

They seem to have tried to outdo each other by coming up with gross out gags...in fact...the more gross...the better.

There are about two REAL gags in the entire film. By real, I mean using genuine humour instead of relying on natural instincts to come into effect when seeing something distateful.

In about January of this year, a little French film called 'Romance' was banned here. The censorship board had the opportunity to give it an 'R' censorship (US equivalent would be NC17) but they banned it so no-one could see it, not even us grown-ups. Anyway, there was an enormous outcry of 'how dare they tell us what adults can and cannot watch' and the media came out in support of this and as a result the film was passed with our 'R' rating. The publicity gave the film unprecidented exposure and the film ended up running about 10 times longer than it would have had it not been banned in the first place.

So, they had banned 'Romance' initially for its nudity and frankness. This film caused people that actually got to see it to go 'what a waste of money' and 'they banned THAT?' and such like. This was a boring film and if anyone is interested in seeing it, I suggest you go watch paint dry as there'll be more happening there than in this movie.

Now, here we have 'Scary Movie' with graphic shots of testacles, penises, severed heads (that continue to talk because THAT is funny!), stabbings, people being run down by cars etc...

...and what did the censorship board give this one? Did they ban it? No. Not a chance. Did they give it an 'R' rating so no-one under 18 could see it at all? Absolutely not. It got an 'MA' classification which is a bullshit rating where if you're under 16 you need an adult to go see it with you. What a fucking embarrassment! If anyone were to see this film, it should ONLY be people 18 and over. Children should not have a chance at all to get in...but they BAN 'Romance'!

Scary Movie is garbage...and what's worse...if a kid aged 7 (or even younger) wants to see it, if he's got an 'adult' to go with him, we can't stop him.

To quote Sheriff Buford T. Justice..."What the hell is the world coming to?"

Shame on you Australian Censorship Board. You have failed us yet again.


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.