|
|
Author
|
Topic: Requiem Foe A Dream
|
|
|
|
|
James R. Hammonds, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 931
From: Houston, TX, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 02-25-2001 12:12 AM
dont mean to picky, tim, but its called requiem FOR a dream, and "pie" is actually spelled pi since there is no key for the symbol.im sure those were just typos, but i just wanted to clear that up. also, sean, where did you see the film where they labeled it nc-17? it was actually released unrated to avoid that. was it a major chain? i know that kids (another disturbing film that should be seen) was unrated, but when one of our amc theatres in houston played it, they labeled it nc-17 also.
|
|
|
Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 06-10-2001 12:11 AM
OMG! What a film! I saw this on DVD the other night and I'm simply blown away by the overall cinematography and story line. Such things that are happening around us ALL right now, that are overlooked, like the fact that the doctor never even bothered to examine Burstyn. He simply gave her an Rx and that was that. How many times does this happen in reality? I've had it happend to me even! The film shows, in a very different way, the effects of addiction(s) on individuals. Very powerful stuff in this film. I'd consider this a must see in my book! I'm glad I have a real film buff working for me now, otherwise I probably would have never seen this film! This film, and others with the same calibre of acting/directing are what *I* consider OSCAR worthy, not the run of the mill films churned out by Hollywood these days! Your milage may vary,
------------------ The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
JC Cowles
Film Handler
Posts: 77
From: St. Paul, MN
Registered: Jun 2001
|
posted 07-01-2001 03:51 AM
I love this movie. I wish I had run down to the local arthouse when it was playing there and seen it, but I saw it for the first time on DVD. Typically with limited release films such as this I expect a compelling storyline with little visual and acoustic flare. RFOD had it all. I first started taking note of Ellen Burstyn's career when I saw her in Spitfire Grill. You can't take your eyes off her, even in her worst moments. The cinematography and editing in this movie were excellent. Visually stunning. It reminded me a bit of Doug Liman's "Go". The editing gave the movie good pace in a story that could otherwise be long drawn-out and campy. Aurally, I found it to be very engrossing. Of course, a lot of movies that end up in arthouses don't get to mix at Skywalker Ranch. Dolby Digital 5.1 indeed! The surround channels really play an active role in this movie. The story was depressing. But it didn't make me sad...it simply intrigued me into finding out how the characters would deal with their situations. I applaud Aronofsky and the crew for making a spectacular movie and finding the perfect balance of things like storyline, actors, special effects, sound and cinematography. Most of Hollywood's dribble seems to be weighted far too much to the special effects and actors. And once in a while I just wish they'd spend half the special effects budget on a decent script.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|