Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Community   » Film Handlers' Movie Reviews   » Shadow of a Vampire

   
Author Topic: Shadow of a Vampire
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-26-2001 09:04 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I liked this, with the exception of the ending which was a bit too abrupt.

The Max Schreck character is beautifully acted and the sets are excellent. The writing is a tad uneven, but it has some great moments and is worth seeing for anyone who appreciates Nosferatu and isn't a stickler for absolute historical accuracy.

The print that I saw wasn't very good--it was rather grainy and lacked shadow detail.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-31-2001 09:21 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When images appear grainy and lack shadow detail ("smoky shadows"), it is often due to an underexposed camera negative, and is not the fault of the print.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Eastman Kodak Company
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7419
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 02-16-2001 11:07 PM      Profile for Jason Black   Author's Homepage   Email Jason Black   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott, John...

I screened our print of Shadow... last night. The whole while I sat there, it seemed as if the focus was soft, for lack of a better term. I noticed also that the film did, in fact, as Scott stated look 'pixelated', well, Scott actually said grainy, but you get the point.

Not knowing what this film was about, I thought I would fall asleep during the first reel. Once the first reel cue went thru, I found myself more into the film and could actually 'visualize' what was going on. All in all, a decent film, especially after seeing some of the other crap that has been out as of late...

YMMV,

------------------
The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.