|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Author
|
Topic: Mummy Returns
|
|
|
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today
Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99
|
posted 05-06-2001 01:19 AM
I saw this movie right after "Freddy Got Fingered" so of course "The Mummy Returns" looked like a masterpiece in comparison. At least there were two good looking women to look at thru this flick. But the movie itself really wasn't special in any way."The Rock" was only in it for 5 minutes I think. During the end they use computer graphics instead of the real person. We all laughed at how bad the computer graphics were. I guess since the movie is banking on the popularity of "The Rock" they wanted to make his CGI just as fake as the WWF itself! I can't believe that they're making a movie called "Scorpion King" based soley on "The Rock"'s character. What wrestling star would name himself after a Nicolas Cage/Sean Connery movie anyway?
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Randy Stankey
Film God
Posts: 6539
From: Erie, Pennsylvania
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 05-06-2001 08:19 PM
The computer animtion reminded me of the mosnter effects in the Sinbad movies. At first I though the animation really sucked then I remembered Sinbad. I wonder if that's the kind of effect they were trying to achieve on purpose. All the rest of the effects in the movie were pretty good. I can't believe they would do such a bad job with The Rock/Scorpion King and do such a good job with all the rest.As far as the rest of the movie went, I kept thinking of other movies each time I saw an effect: Wall of water: The Ten Commandments Creatures scampering along walls: Alien III Evil monkey creatures (Fetishes): The Wizard of Oz Scorpion King: Sinbad Endless army of drones (Anubis Warriors): Star Wars EP1 (et. al.) It was almost as if they were paying tribute to all of the great movie effects of the past. I will say that many, if not all of then were done much better than the original. Even Lucas' "masterpiece" of EP1 pailed by comparison... and that was done only a couple of years ago. Overall, I'd have to say that if you want to enjoy this movie you must go into it with the "willing suspension of disbelief"... Eye candy. Even then some of the scenes are just too far "out there". It's just too hard to believe that a mere mortal can jump 20 feet off the top of a moving drawbridge and make it to the other side in a single leap... even for a movie. As a matter of fact, I had to keep saying that to myself: "It's a movie. They are allowed to do things like that." I did enjoy this one but I repeat. This one is eye candy. I give this one **1/2... but if you love movies with gratuitous explosions and special effects then I'd give it ***.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 05-07-2001 08:40 AM
Did any of you think about "E.T." when you saw the hot-air balloon? It has been a really long time since I've seen "E.T.", but I kept thinking about E.T.'s head every time I saw the balloon. One shot had the balloon floating in front of a full moon.When you saw the little pigmy things in the forest near the end of the movie, did anyone think of "Gremlins"? One review I read before seeing the movie mentioned that there were elements of these movies in there. If I hadn't read that review, I would probably have still thought of E.T. during the hot-air balloon scenes, but probably would not have thought of "Gremlins" during the forest fight scene near the end of the movie. Randy, you're right about the "suspension of disbelief". In one scene, someone jumped from a second-story window and was unhurt. Nobody ever seems to get broken bones jumping from second story windows or roofs in movies.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Jason Black
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1723
From: Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 05-08-2001 12:02 AM
Evans, I can't believe someone else actually thought about ET.. I called out over our two ways when I saw the scene... Even the moon in the background was wayyyy to similar.. Anyhow, as far as movies go, this one BLOWS. I feel it will be successful enough to claim the $100mil mark w/in the 2nd week, but 3rd week should see a FAST dropoff. There will be no long standing second wind for this one as there was for the first... IMO... Damn if I'd see it twice... and damn if I'd tell people to go see it... Joe: You're right.. it would have looked like an oscar winner beside Freddy.. what a waste of film... Canadians should be insulted that Tom Green represents them... .. ------------------ The early bird may get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese!
| IP: Logged
|
|
Dave Bird
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 777
From: Perth, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Jun 2000
|
posted 05-08-2001 07:28 AM
>>>Canadians should be insulted that Tom Green represents them<<<Well, we are, I guess, though I can't say as he's very popular here, in fact I've never seen any of his stuff (filed away in the "If we don't pay attention, he'll go away" file.) More alarming is the contribution he and his supposed new wife Drew Barrymore would make to the gene pool if they had kids. There'd be some BRAINPOWER for you. What kind of math is involved Evans? If you bred two "half-wits", would that give us a "quarter-wit"???? I weep for the future! And besides, we've shipped Mr. Green off to the 'States with all our other famous folk. Though I have a feeling his star is fading fast.......
| IP: Logged
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 05-08-2001 09:14 AM
>>>Canadians should be insulted that Tom Green represents them<<<Just think of the field day that the South Park movie could have had with this with their "Blame Canada" stuff. To keep from wandering off topic too much, more about "The Mummy Returns": I was really surprised when I heard that it beat the record set by Star Wars Episode I and find it difficult to believe. People were camping out to get tickets to SW E1 and crowd sizes were huge. The Mummy Returns did generate large crowds but nothing compared to what Episode I generated in my area. I think ticket prices being higher is what makes movies keep breaking records. If records were based on how many tickets were sold, they'd be more accurate. The Mummy Returns seemed to generate much larger crowds for the 9:00ish showings in my area, but I'd be willing to bet that the crowds will quickly diminish to the point that next weekend, things will be back to normal unless another huge movie comes out. SW E1 drew large crowds for several weeks. About the breeding of "half-wits", there is a lot involved. It depends on which genes the child gets. It is possible to get an intelligent person out of half-wits, but it isn't as likely as with two intelligent parents.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1 2 3
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|