It is a film which you must let yourself be transported into and you'll then succomb to its charms and wonders.

Ewen Mcgregor is fantastic and at one particular point he is _so_ good, I found myself asking 'why on earth are you involved in that Star Wars crap when you are this good an actor'? He also reveals he has a huge...talent as a singer, as does Nicole who is also fantastic in this film.

I would liken it to a Strictly Ballroom with a budget of about another $48million, but that comparison's not really fair...there has never been a movie like this one!

If you've heard negative things about it, see it for yourself and decide. Don't just listen to some critics. Folks seem to love it or hate it.

I loved it.

9/10 Good on you, Baz.

They were speaking about this on the radio the other day. In particular, about some of the negataive reviews for the film. The announcer (who loved the film) said he watched Disney's 'The Kid' on video the night before and hated it for being such formulatic drivel but critics didn't mind it. Yet here we have a director who is prepared to do something very different and he gets slammed for it!

One person rang up and said something to the effect of "I didn't think it was fair that he used other people's songs and changed some of the words to make his movie".

To those sorts of comments, I say: "Get a life".

Baz Luhrman was interviewed the other day also and said of the reviews which are mostly extremes of Awful to Excellent, that the reviews for Strictly Ballroom and Romeo and Juliet were exactly the same and he loves it. He loves that he can invoke such a response from reviewers and the public instead of them just coming out of the movie saying...'It was alright...where do you want to eat?', they come out and are passionate about the films he makes.

Baz was known to move from theatre complex to theatre complex in Sydney when Romeo was released checking for quality and audience reaction. Hopefully, he'll be out there again even as we speak.

Again, good on you, Baz. Thanks for being different.

---------------

...all you need is love.

----------

Never in 28 years as a movie-goer have I heard a packed cinema stand and clap at the end of a film. What a feeling this movie generates, a visually spectacular (spectacular!) experience with a beautiful story line and a love to last the ages. The use of modern day songs and lyrics kept the audience amused and at the edge of their seat to see what song they could recognise next. And who knew that Ewan McGregor and Nicole Kidman could sing? These were the words whispered while filing out of the cinema by hundreds of movie goers through their now subsiding tears. The whole cast surely surprised and mesmerised alot of people with their seemingly unlimited talent but none more-so than Nicole and Ewan. This movie was beautiful in every way and I would strongly recommend it to all ages. I loved this film and believe if the promotion of it is right it may become of Sound of Music notoriety.

------

For more, go to http://us.imdb.com/CommentsShow?203009

If you want to be amused...wait till you see a certain number between Richard Roxburgh (who is also excellent here, unlike his role in MI2 where his talent was completely wasted as a South African thug!!!) and Jim Broadbent. I started to laugh when I realized what they were actually saying and didn't stop until they finished...over three minutes later!

------------------
Children really brighten up your life...they never turn off lights.

 |  IP: Logged

I loved this film. It was gorgeous. USA today had a review that slammed it, and included comments that began with "Take away the...". IDIOTS, take away anything from this film and it sucks. That is why it is so damn good. I have to admit, I liked RnJ. But this was different. I liked the POP aspect, the comedy had great timing and the soundtrack is awesome. Also in the USA today review, they asked the question everyone wants to know, "what demographic?". Oh, wait, NOBODY CARES. How about a movie done for artistic purposes, or maybe they were going for the "intelligent" group, that can find beauty behind Like a Virgin, and Roxanne covers. I certainly know I did, and I hope others will as well.

So why the hell didn't I like this film?

It's a shame. I really wanted to enjoy this like I've enjoyed both of Baz's previous movies. But the editing and camera work in the beginning was just too fast and obnoxious for me to handle. It's like I was hit by a barrage of sensory information with the quick cuts, the singing, the sets, the music, the camera work, and the dancing in the first few numbers, and I'm sure that disorientation was the point, but it was just annoying. And I know the film must focus on Ewan and Nicole's characters but couldn't there have been more development with the Bohemians? I mean the narcoleptic only passed out on us twice. I'm sure Baz could have slipped in another seizure on us once or twice more without running the joke into the ground.

Now by this point my fellow Techers are probably a little pissed at me for being the first to bring any negativity towards this film. Well... get ready to be a little more pissed.

As I was watching this film, I thought to myself, nobody does musicials nowadays like Trey Parker. The next thing I knew, I was recasting the movie in my head. Trey of course was Christian, Matt was Zidler (I know he's too young but it was the only part I could fill him in with), Dian was the midget Toulouse, Toddy Walters (Polly Pry in Cannibal the Musical) was Satine, and for some strange reason, I thought Richard O'Brian would be good for the part of the bald pianist. And I didn't think to change the Duke's part because he was goofy enough. That cast in mind, I suddenly had a better time. But it still required some effort on my part to actually watch the show. Towards the end, it got a little more enjoyable without my backup cast, but it doesn't help my overall opinion of the film, and I was disappointed.

I'm really not trying to say this just to possess a different point of view or intentionally go against the tide of the feelings towards the previous posts just to have a unique voice. I really truly did not like this film. As I said before, all the elements were there, but Baz had to go super stylish on us with his quick paced editing (which is weird because I kept looking at my watch) and it ruined the experience for me. So, needless to say, I am still on the lookout for a really good film this summer. Okay. I'm done. Now I will await the inevitable pommeling from the fans of this movie.

------------------
The man with the magic hands.

Dwayne: I agree with you that Richard O'Brien would have been perfect for the bald pianist. and I could see Gary Oldman pulling off the Duke with ease as well.

Ian! Do you think that Steve K would LOVE this movie? It seems like his type of flick. How 'bout Ky?

 |  IP: Logged

That being said, the DP work and especially the sound mix was extremely well done! Very high ratings go to this flick for technical reasons.

Personally, I found myself thinking how much more humorous the film could've been if every part was played by one of the Kids in the Hall.

(Joe - I believe John Leguizamo was in "Executive Decision". That movie got high scores if for no other reason than because Steven Segal died!)