|
|
Author
|
Topic: Ice Age
|
David Stambaugh
Film God
Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 03-15-2002 09:55 PM
03/15/2002, Regal Cinema World 8, Eugene OR, 4:45PM, #3, glorious 1.85 , digital sound (format unknown). Attendance about 125. Presentation would have rated "excellent" except for a little noticeable dirt in a couple places, one nasty lab splice, and the image was slightly jumpy (vertically). But overall it looked pretty darned good. Volume level was lower than normal, seemed barely adequate to me but OK. Only 90 mins. start to finish, including trailers & ads. I liked it. The story flows nicely, it's kid-friendly, and the characters are very well done. Their mannerisms and expressions really bring them to life. Voices too. They did a great job with the CGI work, which of course is no surprise in animated films these days. This theater puts up a very bright, sharp image and I was paying close attention to things like apparent resolution of the CGI source material and what it might have looked like if projected digitally. In fact if not for the film quirks mentioned above, I could be easily convinced this is what DLP would look like (though I have not actually seen DLP so I may be full of on that). Trailers included a flat/letterboxed version of the new Star Wars EP2 trailer. Seemed like it had more detail in it than Ice Age, really looked nice. Colors look like they are punched up though, more saturated than "normal" or something. It's nice to see the computer system administrators who support the animators get mentioned in the credits. They specifically singled out several UNIX system admins and desktop support techs.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 03-21-2002 11:13 AM
Attendance: 2002/03/21 19:00, Regal Madison Square 12, Huntsville, AL, Auditorium 8, DTS, FlatAfter seeing more and more computer-generated animation, I wonder if it is becoming less and less special to me as I'm exposed to it more. Back in 1995, we all looked at "Toy Story" and were amazed. Now that many such movies have been made, I find myself, when watching them, to not pay as much attention to the computer animated eye candy (unless it's really good) and pay more attention to other aspects of the movies. I'd say that eventually, a movie will be made with beautiful realistic computer animation that will have a weak story, and will forever hurt people's opinions of such movies. Fortunately, "Ice Age" was not that movie. "Ice Age" was a very enjoyable movie with a good story. The animation was well-done (except I thought the people looked quite unrealistic and strange) and there were many beautifully done scenes. I purposely waited a few days after opening night so I wouldn't be in an auditorium full of noisy kids. The showings I chose had less than 20 people, and I never heard a single distracting noise the entire show. The wait was well worth it. The movie held my interest the entire time, and the presentation (image and sound) were near optimal. Ice is a computer animator's dream. There are so many optical properites of ice that can be played with that the possibilities are pratically endless. Ice can be transparent or opaque, or even reflective if the lighting is right. Their adventure through the "short cut" through the ice was visually amazing. Part of it made me thing about the "travel through the wormhole" part of the movie "Contact".
Very highly recommendations! ------------------ Evans A Criswell Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Information Site
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
Scott Norwood
Film God
Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-21-2002 10:11 PM
I liked the film, but I will point out that expectations are important: neither the animation nor the script were quite up to the standards of, say, Monsters Inc. or Toy Story 2 (both of which are Disney/Pixar productions). I don't mean to say that the quality of the computer animation is "bad" (it isn't), but rather that it is "crude" in some ways. While some animated films (using either or both both computer- and cell-animation) have managed to use crudeness to good advantage (e.g. "Hercules"), this doesn't work quite as well here. Maybe we, as audiences, have just become spoiled with so much really great computer animation that anything less than bleeding-edge looks "crude." Oh,well...Having said that, the story is fun (anot not just for kids!), the animation is generally good (particularly the facial expressions of the non-human characters), and the voices are great. I've only seen this in 35mm, but will probably watch it in DLP sometime this weekend.... I did think that the 35mm print that I saw looked quite good.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Peter Berrett
Jedi Master Film Handler
Posts: 602
From: Victoria, Australia
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted 03-22-2002 06:22 PM
Attendance Coburg Drive-in Friday 23 March 2002Another animated Buddy/Road movie except this time the roads are icy. As Joe Redifer said (from the Moulin Rouge thread) quote: Isn't it some sort of law that any movie, EVERY movie, with John Leguizamo will be horribly bad? I have not seen this movie, but every movie with John Leguizamo has always been horribly bad, no exceptions.
The mere prescence of his voice is obviously sufficient for Redifer's Law to hold true. Look the animation was ok but I didn't find the storyline or characters all that appealling. The film is formulaic in many respects and I am tiring of wisecracking animated characters. Its an ok film to watch but just don't expect anything new. I did get the feeling that the scenes featuring the little rodent and his nut were higher quality short animations put into a lower quality film to make it sell. Verdict 6 1/2 stars out of 10 cheers Peter
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler
Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000
|
posted 04-12-2002 04:08 PM
Attendance: 2002/04/10 21:25, Regal Hollywood 18, Huntsville, AL, Auditorium 5Five of my friends had not seen this movie, so they chose to see it and I tagged along. I had not intended on seeing it again, but really wanted to hang out with this group. I must say that I enjoyed the movie as much the second time as I did the first, and the entire group of friends (which comprised 75 percent of the audience (6 out of 8) loved it. It was definitely a winner with my friends. Just hearing their reactions to different things in the movie made it a lot of fun to watch. If you haven't seen this movie yet, by all means do so before it leaves theatres! It's definitely more fun seeing this one with a group. ------------------ Evans A Criswell Huntsville-Decatur Movie Theatre Information Site
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|