|
|
Author
|
Topic: E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, The 20th Anniversary
|
Mitchell Cope
Master Film Handler
Posts: 256
From: Overland Park, KS, United States
Registered: Jun 99
|
posted 03-31-2002 07:18 AM
When ET first came out, it was not one of my favorite Spielberg films. I probably feel the same way today, except I appreciate how well this film iconified things we take for granted today. For that reason, I am glad that Spielberg made ET.John Williams, who won an Oscar for ET, really deserves a lot of the credit I think for the movie's success. He must have put in a lot of overtime on this score. There is scoring everywhere. Thankfully it was memorable. I'm not sure why this film doesn't seem as sharp as other Spielberg films, yet it is Spielberg. Things seem protracted. Things seem to occur, that have no explanation. Why is it when we first see the cute little kids around the dinner table, there is cigarette smoke coming up like this was the poker game in "Risky Business"? When the kid is trying to unattach the chute on the back of the speeding van, why does it take him so long? How come the men in the chute, who are standing up, not able to get in before being disattached? Despite these anomalies, the movie has to be seen on the big screen to really be appreciated to its fullest. Spielberg made excellent casting choices for the lead roles, but the extras didn't look like they came from central casting. Was this a low budget film for Spielberg? The scenes in Elliot's bedroom were shot terrific and it is there that we come to love the kids and ET. Kudos to Elliot (Henry Thomas) and Gertie (Drew Barrymore) for making their roles memorable. And then there is the bike chase scene. What kid who owns a bike wouldn't love being chased by cops, jumping hills and police cars, all to the accompaniment of that John Williams score? And if you can believe, like in "Peter Pan", you can fly. Like me, even if you didn't get it the first go round, it is worth your time. I enjoyed it more than some of the new films coming out today. Here's to hoping that ET comes home for his 40th anniversary.
| IP: Logged
|
|
Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!
Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999
|
posted 03-31-2002 03:19 PM
I didn't like ET when I showed it on it's initial release 20 years ago, and I like it less now on it's butchered version. Here is hoping that people realize it was junk when it was made and it's success was a fluke!One thing I do agree with Mitchell with is that Henry Thomas did an excellent job and was the best part of the film. Steve ------------------ "Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Stambaugh
Film God
Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002
|
posted 04-03-2002 11:33 AM
I have no problem with them tweaking things 20 years after the fact, as long as the original is preserved and offered, as is being done with the DVD of ET.I first saw ET at a sneak preview in Costa Mesa, CA (Edwards Town Center Cinema, in garden-variety 35mm and optical Dolby Stereo). The advance buzz on the movie was huge, and expectations were very high. We stood in line for several hours to ensure getting good seats. At the end of the show, the audience exited in a sort of stunned silence. Many people were openly emotional. When the general run started and 70mm prints were showing all over SoCal, I saw it several more times, and usually to packed houses, even several months after it opened. It was truly a phenomenon unlikely to happen again. Times may have changed, people are more cynical about such things, but there is no denying that ET captured some very special magic. I have no desire to see the re-issue though because I want to remember it exactly the way it was 20 years ago and what it was like seeing it with an audience back then.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Brad Miller
Administrator
Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99
|
posted 04-03-2002 08:49 PM
Frank, I don't believe I said anything like "you must be an idiot if you liked that Universal intro". I am entitled to my opinion just as much as anyone else. You wrote your opinion of the logo and I wrote mine. If you don't like what I have to say or the way I say it, just leave or skip over my posts, for I am not going to sugar coat my comments just to soothe you. No one is forcing you to post or read what is written here. Get it?Before you post again on this site you need to read the final paragraph in the FAQ. Email me once you have read and understand this.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
|
Frank Aston
Film Handler
Posts: 54
From: Albrighton, Shropshire, UK
Registered: May 2000
|
posted 04-04-2002 05:07 AM
Many thanks Charles, Chris and Aaron.I stand corrected. Spy Game had a different distributor in the UK so the Universal/ET logo didn't appear. We haven't had the pleasure of Big Fat Liar yet. Kind regards, Frank.
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
|
|
Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM
6.3.1.2
The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion
and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.
|